NONE of them were George Walker Bush. Sounds like precedent, if you ask me.got tonkaed wrote:Quick, without googling tell me something about 5 nobel peace prize winners.
Exactly.
Moderator: Community Team
NONE of them were George Walker Bush. Sounds like precedent, if you ask me.got tonkaed wrote:Quick, without googling tell me something about 5 nobel peace prize winners.
Exactly.
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
... I don't want to argue with you Cap'n, but I have to ask. Why, and be as specific as you can, please, do you feel Obama is/will be a good president?captainwalrus wrote:Yeah, even though I think Obama is/will be a good president, it is a little ridiculous. He really hasn't don't anything.
He isn't George W. Bush.Nobunaga wrote:... I don't want to argue with you Cap'n, but I have to ask. Why, and be as specific as you can, please, do you feel Obama is/will be a good president?captainwalrus wrote:Yeah, even though I think Obama is/will be a good president, it is a little ridiculous. He really hasn't don't anything.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
almost a precedent weighty enough to be crushed by to be honest.spurgistan wrote:NONE of them were George Walker Bush. Sounds like precedent, if you ask me.got tonkaed wrote:Quick, without googling tell me something about 5 nobel peace prize winners.
Exactly.
The dumbest thing you have ever heard? Please for 100 million dollars, without google, example why one of the other candidates selected would have been a better choice.bedub1 wrote:This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. The Nobel committee is obviously full of morons.
A million bucks is a million bucks..joecoolfrog wrote:I guess its based on expectation rather than performance to date , the prize to me was a tad devalued once it had been given to Kissinger so it should hardly be taken at face value.
Spazz Arcane wrote:If birds could swim and fish could fly I would awaken in the morning to the sturgeons cry. If fish could fly and birds could swim I'd still use worms to fish for them.
saxitoxin wrote:I'm on Team GabonX
Agreed, but not necessarily because of this incident.bedub1 wrote:This is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. The Nobel committee is obviously full of morons.
Spazz Arcane wrote:If birds could swim and fish could fly I would awaken in the morning to the sturgeons cry. If fish could fly and birds could swim I'd still use worms to fish for them.
saxitoxin wrote:I'm on Team GabonX
So even Obama realizes it's not for what he did in 12 days, but for what he wants to do. People are so obsessed with him, that he gets prizes for what he wants to do...before he even does it.Obama wrote:In a brief statement in the White House Rose Garden on Friday, the president said he does not "view it as a recognition of my own accomplishments," but rather as a recognition of goals he has set for the United States and the world.
Obama was 12 days in, these other guys were there for six or seven years. The award is now worthless.Only two other sitting presidents, Theodore Roosevelt in 1906 and Woodrow Wilson in 1919, have been awarded the prestigious Peace Prize. Roosevelt was honored largely for brokering an agreement between Russia and China, and Wilson took the award for his role in ending World War I and creating the League of Nations.
It's far too early to compare Obama to either of his predecessors, said Allan Lichtman, professor of history at American University.
"They're not comparable," Lichtman said. "[Roosevelt and Wilson] were six or seven years into two-term presidencies, and Obama has not completed a single year of his presidency, so it makes very little sense."
That it does..bedub1 wrote:This just goes to show people have an unhealthy obsession with their new savior and god Obama...
Spazz Arcane wrote:If birds could swim and fish could fly I would awaken in the morning to the sturgeons cry. If fish could fly and birds could swim I'd still use worms to fish for them.
saxitoxin wrote:I'm on Team GabonX
Yes. Because I am the Nobel Peace Prize Committee. And Obama is an agent of the Swedish secret service! I, for one, welcome our new Swedish overlords!!!bedub1 wrote:This just goes to show people have an unhealthy obsession with their new savior and god Obama...
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
(the founder of the Nobel Peace Prize was named Nobel. Fostering international diplomacy [what this award was given for] and cooperation between peoples was EXACTLY what he had in mind!)THORNHEART wrote:Dang! I wish I was black...then I could get up and read in a godlike way some speaches written for me by my wife michelle and extend my arms towards heaven as the world crowns me king of peace and health and life and beauty.
I am going to puke ....I am sure the founder of the noble peace prize had a different Idea than this when He instituted it...Now we give the peace prize to the most popular political figure at the time not to anyone who has actually promoted peace.
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
Indeed. Telomeres and ribosomes are particularly awesome.spurgistan wrote:Yes. Because I am the Nobel Peace Prize Committee. And Obama is an agent of the Swedish secret service! I, for one, welcome our new Swedish overlords!!!bedub1 wrote:This just goes to show people have an unhealthy obsession with their new savior and god Obama...
There are plenty of rational ways to go about questioning why Obama deserved the Prize (I am, although we are all ignorant of who the other nominees were) but to go about it by simply attacking the integrity of the Nobel Prize (as seems to be the rule among mainstream conservatives) is just off. It is an established honor and an outstanding recognition of one's positive impact on the world. I thought you would be against denigrating it for purely partisan means. Well.
Congratulations to all the 2009 Nobel Laureates!
Medicine Laureates
Elizabeth H. Blackburn
Carol W. Greider
Jack W. Szostak
"for the discovery of how chromosomes are protected by telomeres and the enzyme telomerase"
Physics Laureates
Charles K. Kao
"for groundbreaking achievements concerning the transmission of light in fibers for optical communication"
Willard S. Boyle
George E. Smith
"for the invention of an imaging semiconductor circuit – the CCD sensor"
Chemistry Laureates
Venkatraman Ramakrishnan
Thomas A. Steitz
Ada E. Yonath
"for studies of the structure and function of the ribosome"
Literature Laureate
Herta Müller
"who, with the concentration of poetry and the frankness of prose, depicts the landscape of the dispossessed"
Peace Prize Laureate
Barack Obama
"for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples"
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
No kidding and all this Obama worship is getting a little sickening. The story about those people in Michigan fighting over money they think that the president is going to personally send them, those kids who were taught to sing praises to Obama's name, Libya's leader saying he wishes Obama could be leader forever. So much for separation of church and state. The Democrat Party is no longer a political party - it's a religious cult!!bedub1 wrote:This just goes to show people have an unhealthy obsession with their new savior and god Obama...

TheBro wrote: I'm pulling for Dana White to win the next one!
The Nobel organization has been somewhat of a joke for some time know, particularly because of the kinds of people that win the peace prize.spurgistan wrote: There are plenty of rational ways to go about questioning why Obama deserved the Prize (I am, although we are all ignorant of who the other nominees were) but to go about it by simply attacking the integrity of the Nobel Prize (as seems to be the rule among mainstream conservatives) is just off. It is an established honor and an outstanding recognition of one's positive impact on the world. I thought you would be against denigrating it for purely partisan means.
Spazz Arcane wrote:If birds could swim and fish could fly I would awaken in the morning to the sturgeons cry. If fish could fly and birds could swim I'd still use worms to fish for them.
saxitoxin wrote:I'm on Team GabonX
Again, id offer the same 100 million dollars to you that i offered bedub, if you can explain without googling, what one of the other nominees did that was more worthy of winning the award. If you cant, then really your getting riled up over something that is essentially to you, a non-issue.grandin wrote:The peace price to Obama?
This is utterly ridicilous... He hasn't accomplished much so far, and has certainly not deserved this distinguished prize. Don't get me wrong, i don't have anything against Obama. Yet. But c'mon? The PEACE PRICE? Right...
You know what this is? A reward to the american public for getting rid of the republicans in the white house. And perhaps a way for norway to get a high profile visitor.
It's bullshit.
I don't even know who else was nominated. The thing is, I don't know what any of the other people has done, because I'm not familiar with them, but I am familiar with the winner, and I KNOW he hasn't done, didn't do, ANYTHING in 12 days to deserve the nomination/award.got tonkaed wrote:Again, id offer the same 100 million dollars to you that i offered bedub, if you can explain without googling, what one of the other nominees did that was more worthy of winning the award. If you cant, then really your getting riled up over something that is essentially to you, a non-issue.grandin wrote:The peace price to Obama?
This is utterly ridicilous... He hasn't accomplished much so far, and has certainly not deserved this distinguished prize. Don't get me wrong, i don't have anything against Obama. Yet. But c'mon? The PEACE PRICE? Right...
You know what this is? A reward to the american public for getting rid of the republicans in the white house. And perhaps a way for norway to get a high profile visitor.
It's bullshit.
I hope he does the work and accomplishes enough in the next 3 years that he actually deserves an award such as this. It would be great if he was able to accomplish that. The reason I'm able to criticize, is because in the first 12 days, HE DIDN'T DO ANYTHING! Can't you understand that? I don't have anything against him getting an award, I just have something against him getting an award for doing nothing. It would be like me, in college, talking about this great paper I'm going to write, and getting an A for it, even before I write it! Can't you see? You shouldn't be rewarded for something you haven't done yet. Just talking about it isn't enough....YOU ACTUALLY HAVE TO ACCOMPLISH SOMETHING.got tonkaed wrote:The point is, without knowing anything about who is nominated, without knowing anything about what the criterion for the award are, without it having any releveance to your life 364 days a year, and probably 8 to 9 years out of 10, you really have no grounds for criticizing any of the selections in a reasonable fashion.
the fact that you dislike obama, basically means youd probably come out for just about any thread that gave him an award, especially if it was something like the Nobel Peace Prize, but youd probably do the same if it was the Mcnaughton Global Justice Award as well.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
bedub1 wrote:I hope he does the work and accomplishes enough in the next 3 years that he actually deserves an award such as this. It would be great if he was able to accomplish that. The reason I'm able to criticize, is because in the first 12 days, HE DIDN'T DO ANYTHING! Can't you understand that? I don't have anything against him getting an award, I just have something against him getting an award for doing nothing. It would be like me, in college, talking about this great paper I'm going to write, and getting an A for it, even before I write it! Can't you see? You shouldn't be rewarded for something you haven't done yet. Just talking about it isn't enough....YOU ACTUALLY HAVE TO ACCOMPLISH SOMETHING.got tonkaed wrote:The point is, without knowing anything about who is nominated, without knowing anything about what the criterion for the award are, without it having any releveance to your life 364 days a year, and probably 8 to 9 years out of 10, you really have no grounds for criticizing any of the selections in a reasonable fashion.
the fact that you dislike obama, basically means youd probably come out for just about any thread that gave him an award, especially if it was something like the Nobel Peace Prize, but youd probably do the same if it was the Mcnaughton Global Justice Award as well.