The term used "officially" on the site is Reinforcements.Fazeem wrote:Interesting option but should it not be called no fortifications?
Moderator: Community Team
The term used "officially" on the site is Reinforcements.Fazeem wrote:Interesting option but should it not be called no fortifications?
Yup read the tread from the start and don t understand what is unclear about a reinforcement for some of you. On the drop it s deployment or drop, not reinforcements!spiesr wrote:The term used "officially" on the site is Reinforcements.Fazeem wrote:Interesting option but should it not be called no fortifications?

This is the most relevant point to this not being implemened, as far as I can see.The Voice wrote:People who use the timing out to their benefit in games with spoils are no longer punished by not being able to fort.
Now that the no forts option is a reality, the no refusing cards bugfix becomes even more crucial.chapcrap wrote:This is the most relevant point to this not being implemened, as far as I can see.The Voice wrote:People who use the timing out to their benefit in games with spoils are no longer punished by not being able to fort.
I think before this is implemented (if it is), then the thread below also needs to be implemented to protect against the situation that The Voice is talking about.
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 5#p1009545