Conquer Club

hmm i have no idea who's mafia, i have suspicions on virtually everyone but not enouth to vote on. i do however feel that one of the more active posters is scum and he's directing the votes but i cant tell who it is untill we get the results from the lynchings...

Balsiefen wrote:hmm i have no idea who's mafia, i have suspicions on virtually everyone but not enouth to vote on. i do however feel that one of the more active posters is scum and he's directing the votes but i cant tell who it is untill we get the results from the lynchings...

This is a great example of fence sitting and trying to trick players into thinking your participating.

Guess what, you've just did a whole post to say NOTHING! YAY FOR NOTHING!

Fircoal wrote:Actually I think that both of you would of been good candidates. But then agsin you were the one who said to do the lynch.

Well I know that I probably shouldn't have voted for Chad to start with, but I'm trying to cover for the possibility he was town with my current vote. Though, if both end up town, man I'd have screwed that one I think odds are good enough for that not to happen anyway

vote red bull
for reasons said up there^^^

although ga7 is looking suspiscious

ga7 wrote:You want a case?

Chad: 11 votes made
Fircoal: 8 votes made

My vote on Chad stands

how does that make him scum?
He was just being silly because it was day1

ok first of all fos all players that are voting me and giving the reason of "what he said " GIVE YOUR OWN REASON and i will role claim soon if this does not stop

Firth, please tell me how you could go back to page 8 to find this but not read my following explanatory posts on the same page?

Fircoal wrote:

Balsiefen wrote:hmm i have no idea who's mafia, i have suspicions on virtually everyone but not enouth to vote on. i do however feel that one of the more active posters is scum and he's directing the votes but i cant tell who it is untill we get the results from the lynchings...

This is a great example of fence sitting and trying to trick players into thinking your participating.

Guess what, you've just did a whole post to say NOTHING! YAY FOR NOTHING!

i wasn't posting to show i was participationg i was posting to make a point, so far it seemes people are voting for a random bag mix of players. all i'm saying is that we should slow down a bit and stop pannicking. i'm sorry if i cant say anything much more valuble but when i come on very little has happened and everyone has already voted and bandwagoned on players for small reasons

Balsiefen wrote:

Fircoal wrote:

Balsiefen wrote:hmm i have no idea who's mafia, i have suspicions on virtually everyone but not enouth to vote on. i do however feel that one of the more active posters is scum and he's directing the votes but i cant tell who it is untill we get the results from the lynchings...

This is a great example of fence sitting and trying to trick players into thinking your participating.

Guess what, you've just did a whole post to say NOTHING! YAY FOR NOTHING!

i wasn't posting to show i was participationg i was posting to make a point, so far it seemes people are voting for a random bag mix of players. all i'm saying is that we should slow down a bit and stop pannicking. i'm sorry if i cant say anything much more valuble but when i come on very little has happened and everyone has already voted and bandwagoned on players for small reasons

Hmm, you do it again. ACtually almost all of the votes are on Red Bull, skimmer. I think it's already pretty slow. I don't think there is really any need. Fos: Balsiefen

Balsiefen wrote:

Fircoal wrote:

Balsiefen wrote:hmm i have no idea who's mafia, i have suspicions on virtually everyone but not enouth to vote on. i do however feel that one of the more active posters is scum and he's directing the votes but i cant tell who it is untill we get the results from the lynchings...

This is a great example of fence sitting and trying to trick players into thinking your participating.

Guess what, you've just did a whole post to say NOTHING! YAY FOR NOTHING!

i wasn't posting to show i was participationg i was posting to make a point, so far it seemes people are voting for a random bag mix of players. all i'm saying is that we should slow down a bit and stop pannicking. i'm sorry if i cant say anything much more valuble but when i come on very little has happened and everyone has already voted and bandwagoned on players for small reasons

what the heck ... i believe i have all the vote so far on me i dont believe any one has voted any one else thank you very much .... i feel so loved any way there are a few that seem to come in here vote for who ever has the most votes on them and leave i will make up a list of them after i go back to work and then come back ok? ok well thats all for now

BANDWAGON=BAD!!!!!!!!!!

Well I'm back people (YAY!). Prepare for a post storm. Well actually this should be my only post til someone is crazy enough to respond to my rambling, incoherent ideas.

Moving on:

BANDWAGON=BAD

I think that Red Bull does look like the best choice right now but let's not all vote him at once. I was suspicious of him the most before we went on chad. He was submarining (his excuse was doing other stuff, basically a carbon copy of PCM's excuse). Also his only post for the first few pages was a vote on chad. Which he never unvoted. I agree with ga7 in that we should lynch the one who pushed most strongly for the chad lynch. But on a side note to ga7: By that logic shouldn't we lynch you next since you seem to be pushing most for the red bull lynch?

Also, good job on that cop claim fircoal . Even if it is a joke it's very weird.

FOS bandwagoners(again)

FOS red bull (again)

You are right Kwanton, by that logic I'm next. However, I'd rather leave my lynch for tomorrow so that we can see if I screwed up or not
Joke aside, if there's another lynch we'll be 14. So I'm not sure if it's enough for day 1 or not. Either way I'll be happy if we lynch at least one scum

Anyway I never said my vote was set in stone; maybe I'm pushing too strong but originally I just voted him again following my reasoning, and when the votes on him piled up his defense mostly consisted of trying to put the heat on me instead, so he appeared more scummy to me. In any case votes haven't been coming that fast, and we still have plenty of time.

Sorry if that post doesn't make much sense, it's late and I start to want brains

Skoffin wrote: *Pats Kwanton on the head and tosses him a scooby snack*

Rooby rooby roo!

ga7 wrote:Sorry if that post doesn't make much sense, it's late and I start to want brains

Bah I laugh at your definition of late. Try waking up 5 hours before you normally do to take a 3 hour car ride to college orientation and then waking up the same time the next day to walk around a whole campus.

Anyway I'm sure red bull has a better defense. Just let him come back and defend himself before we lynch him. And if you haven't noticed by now I say this about every person who is in any danger whatsoever of being lynched. No exceptions.

One exception: I won't if they're stupid or fircoal

Skoffin wrote:*Shoots the pokemon*

WHAT WAS THAT FOR JERK!

*shoots SKoffin*

kwanton wrote: One exception: I won't if they're stupid or fircoal

That's not very nice.

Anyway, I argee with most of what kwanton said, but it's a bandwagon that most of the active people are on. IT makes sense that we lynch some one from each side of the arguement. Though the reason I'm not voting for him is because he's not the scummiest. in my opinion, Balsiefan is acting scummier.

Haha. You know I don't really mean it Fircoal. I just think digimon is better is all

well its time for me to claim ... and this is the first tim i will ever claim this ..... i am a sk .... you heard me an sk.... BUT I WORK FOR GOOD NOT EVIL!!!!!! it is in my better judge ment to kill off all scum before you kill me yes thats right so really i am a vig so umm yea umm DONT KILL ME ILL WORK FOR YOU UNTILL THERE ALL DEAD !!!!! ok im dead now arnt i

Skoffin wrote: Yeah likely you're a goner.. why'd you say SK to begin with if you're a vig? Not sure I understand you.

beacuse i am a sk but i am going to act like a vig i AM WORKING FOR THE TOWN !!!! then when they are all dead you can kill me

red bull wrote:

Skoffin wrote: Yeah likely you're a goner.. why'd you say SK to begin with if you're a vig? Not sure I understand you.

beacuse i am a sk but i am going to act like a vig i AM WORKING FOR THE TOWN !!!! then when they are all dead you can kill me

But how do we know when all the mafia are still here. We could only have you left and kil town because we don't know.

Skoffin wrote: Ahh, so you're a Sk who has decided to act like a vig. Now just how are we supposed to trust you? If a few innocents die you could claim you had nothing to do with it, or that you just thought they were bad. That's not going to fly.

well of course there are going to be miss even with a vig there are miss when they kill a townie

Fircoal wrote:

red bull wrote:

Skoffin wrote: Yeah likely you're a goner.. why'd you say SK to begin with if you're a vig? Not sure I understand you.

beacuse i am a sk but i am going to act like a vig i AM WORKING FOR THE TOWN !!!! then when they are all dead you can kill me

But how do we know when all the mafia are still here. We could only have you left and kil town because we don't know.

easy when there is only one kill then its only me left