Conquer Club

Posted: **Tue Jul 31, 2007 5:24 pm**

Bah, no matter, surviving wasn't one of my WCs.

Go Town!

Posted: **Tue Jul 31, 2007 5:25 pm**

Bah.

I finally got to play as a doc, and got killed night one. I knew it would end up this way.

Posted: **Tue Jul 31, 2007 5:39 pm**

now that night is over i can say that i'm back from comic-con and ready to play.

am i the only one who thought Toad's death scene made it seem like 2 people took him out?

Posted: **Tue Jul 31, 2007 5:43 pm**

and it also sounds like the SK is Boo

so we have mafia (likely killed aimless), SK (took out mandy) and

(who also targeted aimless)

at least that's my theory

Posted: **Tue Jul 31, 2007 5:47 pm**

Vote: PCM

Random vote.

Posted: **Tue Jul 31, 2007 5:52 pm**

Boo killed MAndy.

Bowser killed Aimless
Another person, targeted Aimless.

Posted: **Tue Jul 31, 2007 9:25 pm**

Is a commuter something like a bus driver who drives himself around?

Why do Toad's wounds lead people to believe he has been targeted by two people? I'm not saying it's impossible, but I don't read that in the description.

Posted: **Tue Jul 31, 2007 10:02 pm**

Mandalorian and Aimless dead Night 1? This is gonna be an interesting game... Its too bad we lost 2 good roles though.

Posted: **Tue Jul 31, 2007 10:03 pm**

Fos MM for voting at night. Getting confused with another game?

FOS nark for random voting on day 2.

The NK's make me think SK and mafia. Obviously mandy was killed by one of those ghost type things(idk the name I haven't played a mario game in a while) and aimless was killed by something that burns you?

Posted: **Tue Jul 31, 2007 10:06 pm**

Fircoal wrote:Boo killed MAndy.

Bowser killed Aimless
Another person, targeted Aimless.

Yep.

Seems Aimless is a popular fellow.

Posted: **Tue Jul 31, 2007 10:21 pm**

The fact that Aimless' role has anpther color than ga7's and Mandy's suggests that he belonged to another faction. Yet, If I look at their roles, they all seem to be town. Am I missing something?

Posted: **Tue Jul 31, 2007 11:13 pm**

Koesen wrote:The fact that Aimless' role has anpther color than ga7's and Mandy's suggests that he belonged to another faction. Yet, If I look at their roles, they all seem to be town. Am I missing something?

Thats a good question. It's been awhile since I've played Mario (N64) but I don't remember the good guys having any factions.

Posted: **Tue Jul 31, 2007 11:23 pm**

The way I see it is the Doc was listed in a diff color so maybe the power "pro" townies are that color while the non "power" townies are the other. Either way discussing colors isn't really relevent to the game at this point.

Based off of yesterday's testimony without any proof other then my personal feelings that I expressed I would like to renew my vote on Koeson as I still believe it was a pretty scummy type of statement to make although I am not fully convinced you are scum. Should better evidence come up, I'll be happy to unvote to someone that is scummier. Vote Koeson

The NK's make me think SK and mafia. Obviously mandy was killed by one of those ghost type things(idk the name I haven't played a mario game in a while) and aimless was killed by something that burns you?

Bowser used to shoot fire out in the original Mario game for Nintendo so he probably killed Aimless in regards to the burn marks. I'm also thinking we might have a vigilante in the game that attacked Aimless. While I don't have proof of it, I know personally that I thought Aimless was acting a bit suspicious yesterday in regarsd to pushing for GA's lynch. It wouldn't surprise me if anyone that was the vigilante may have took a shot at it as well even though shouldn't risk a shot unless you're about 99% sure that person is scum.

Posted: **Wed Aug 01, 2007 3:23 am**

In regards to the colours, I use blue for protective/investigative roles and green for other types of pro-town roles. Nothing to do with factions.

Posted: **Wed Aug 01, 2007 4:08 am**

Minister Masket wrote:UNVOTE
VOTE KOESEN
Don't be fooled by his "apparant" despair, he voted for ga7 twice.
Perhaps the first vote was random, but the second? Unlikely.

Posted: **Wed Aug 01, 2007 6:02 am**

Bye everybody see yall be Friday night at the latest. I'll try to drop in if I can before then.

Josh

Posted: **Wed Aug 01, 2007 6:25 am**

Minister Masket wrote:
Minister Masket wrote:UNVOTE
VOTE KOESEN
Don't be fooled by his "apparant" despair, he voted for ga7 twice.
Perhaps the first vote was random, but the second? Unlikely.

Is this a vote for today MM?

Posted: **Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:08 am**

Toad is also one of the ''attacks'' of peach in super smash melee, more like a shield rather than an attack.

Gonna re-read again now.

Posted: **Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:12 am**

Minister Masket wrote:
Minister Masket wrote:UNVOTE
VOTE KOESEN
Don't be fooled by his "apparant" despair, he voted for ga7 twice.
Perhaps the first vote was random, but the second? Unlikely.

There was 9 votes against ga7. And you only go on koesen, for the simple fact he voted twice? Day 1 is always rather clueless, there was no way for him to kow he was town if koesen was town.

I do NOT clear him, but MM, that's not the greatest reason to vote IMO.

Vote: MM Unless you got more evidences? I will be happy to unvote if you can show some thing else, too..

Posted: **Wed Aug 01, 2007 8:31 am**

freezie wrote:Toad is also one of the ''attacks'' of peach in super smash melee, more like a shield rather than an attack.

Gonna re-read again now.

ya, but that would be more of a bulletproof role. And that move sucks.

Posted: **Wed Aug 01, 2007 8:32 am**

Fircoal wrote:
freezie wrote:Toad is also one of the ''attacks'' of peach in super smash melee, more like a shield rather than an attack.

Gonna re-read again now.
ya, but that would be more of a bulletproof role. And that move sucks.

Bullet proof? Nope..it's a shield..More like a bodyguard.

And it sucks? You never met a good player playing peach. It's far from sucking.

Posted: **Wed Aug 01, 2007 8:35 am**

freezie wrote:
Fircoal wrote:
freezie wrote:Toad is also one of the ''attacks'' of peach in super smash melee, more like a shield rather than an attack.

Gonna re-read again now.
ya, but that would be more of a bulletproof role. And that move sucks.

Bullet proof? Nope..it's a shield..More like a bodyguard.

And it sucks? You never met a good player playing peach. It's far from sucking.

Ya, kind of. ANd I meant bodygaurd, but whatever. I guess it also fits into the doc catergory. Sorry, it's 6:30 here, and I'm not used to being up now.

Uh, no, none of my friends, use Peach, and I barely play the coms, and I haven't watched Peach vids, so no I've never seen it used good. Who can guess what character I use?

Posted: **Wed Aug 01, 2007 8:58 am**

Minister Masket wrote:
Minister Masket wrote:UNVOTE
VOTE KOESEN
Don't be fooled by his "apparant" despair, he voted for ga7 twice.
Perhaps the first vote was random, but the second? Unlikely.

No shit, Sherlock. My second vote had about a page worth of motivation. Of course it wasn't random. It was based on what I perceived to be a scummy attack.

Do you realize you are making a lot of noise here without actually saying anything that isn't blatantly obvious?

Fos MM

Posted: **Wed Aug 01, 2007 11:37 am**

Koesen wrote:
Minister Masket wrote:
Minister Masket wrote:UNVOTE
VOTE KOESEN
Don't be fooled by his "apparant" despair, he voted for ga7 twice.
Perhaps the first vote was random, but the second? Unlikely.
No shit, Sherlock. My second vote had about a page worth of motivation. Of course it wasn't random. It was based on what I perceived to be a scummy attack.

Do you realize you are making a lot of noise here without actually saying anything that isn't blatantly obvious?

Fos MM

And also making himself look fairly scummy in the process...

Posted: **Wed Aug 01, 2007 11:39 am**

freezie wrote:
Minister Masket wrote:
Minister Masket wrote:UNVOTE
VOTE KOESEN
Don't be fooled by his "apparant" despair, he voted for ga7 twice.
Perhaps the first vote was random, but the second? Unlikely.

There was 9 votes against ga7. And you only go on koesen, for the simple fact he voted twice? Day 1 is always rather clueless, there was no way for him to kow he was town if koesen was town.

I do NOT clear him, but MM, that's not the greatest reason to vote IMO.

Vote: MM Unless you got more evidences? I will be happy to unvote if you can show some thing else, too..

But the fact remains he was the one of the first to vote for him. He practically started the bandwagon against ga7. And that just aint right.

Serbia wrote:Is this a vote for today MM?

No I just felt like voting for him... [/sarcasm]

Koesen wrote:No shit, Sherlock. My second vote had about a page worth of motivation. Of course it wasn't random. It was based on what I perceived to be a scummy attack.

Do you realize you are making a lot of noise here without actually saying anything that isn't blatantly obvious?

Yeah well, you "percieved" wrong. The fact that you lynched a townie and I didn't kind of points the finger at yourself. Remember, you were the first to vote for ga7...

Conquer Club

Super Mario Mafia - TOWN WIN!