Moderator: Cartographers
I am presnetly reworking the stations to take into account the need for the simpler codes to correspond with the xml. therefore Paris is not out the firing line for re-design, although IO would like to try and keep it in this style, same as with RAIL USA.Lone.prophet wrote:you think it would be better if paris was devide into 4 like the actual stations?

Version 24cairnswk wrote:No...the three letters won't fit downwards in that side box. Well at small font size 7 they fit but one can't read that on the small map.oaktown wrote: I imagine there is no way to sneak the three letter track code vertically down the side, either in the color box or in the army box?
R
I
B
The only other thing to do is remove the Line Code BRX (eg) from the legend and simply have A, B, C, D, and code it that way.



OK Optumis...thanks for that, i will change them back to bold....different font, but bolded....easy-peasy (ha i been watching too much Jamie)Optimus Prime wrote:I don't know about anyone else, but I think the bolded station names were both easier to read, and better looking. Just an opinion. The new version looks.....alright in that regard, I just think the last one looked better.



Don't you think that is "overdoing it"?yeti_c wrote:For completeness - I would add the "alpha" code to all stations... This 'should' also help everyone to be able to tell the exact continents if they are CB... (Although as I'm not I can't guarantee that is the case)
C.

yes....although, Florence, Venice, Koln, and Sofia will only have one station code and not a line code.yeti_c wrote:I just think that each station should be the same - else people will look at the letters and think - what are those letters for and why are they only on half of the stations?
C.

Onbekende...thanks..i have adjusted some of those bonuses as per your request in the Version 24 above. Please F5 to C changes.onbekende wrote: Rest is fine, huzzah its back

Onbekende...i just figured out how to show that station....F5 in a few minutes to see the changes in the map above.onbekende wrote:now; Lausane, whats the deal? I see 2 train stops, thus those 2 lines (red and cyan just run thruw it without a stop?




Thanks for that ian...changed in xml and map.iancanton wrote:cairns
i've checked nothing else but names in the xml.
GLW Glasgow
KLN Koeln
BUD Budapest
E Train a Grande Vitesse
G Scandinavian Rail (perhaps Scan Rail is better, as this latter name is in actual use)
SPG St Petersburg
KLG Kaliningrad
BUC Bucharest
CBA Reggio di Calabria
BRU Brussels or Brussel (both versions appear in xml)
attacking: stations separated (not "interested") by lines cannot attack each other (no comma wanted between lines and cannot)
I chose those stations because of their absolute closeness to the borders.i find odd the choice of stations at the france-spain frontier. all other stations on the map are well-known cities but these. did u consider san sebastian and perpignan as alternatives at any point?
Done.some of the city codes are somewhat unorthodox, for example BCN is almost universally used as shorthand for barcelona and, similarly, CPH for copenhagen, but i think no-one will lose sleep over this.
yes i think it is absolutely necessary to have that link.i also like the visual link between paris and rail usa's chicago.
ian![]()

Code: Select all
<components>
<territory>john</territory>
<continent>dave</continent>
</components>
Code: Select all
<components>
<component>john</component>
</components>

Thanks C....got that from my old Rail USA fileyeti_c wrote:Cairns,
The XML - is out of date I'm afraid...
The new XML means that we have...
Code: Select all
<components> <territory>john</territory> <continent>dave</continent> </components>Also I'd consider a colon... i.e.Code: Select all
<components> <component>john</component> </components>
A: British Rail
B: Benelux Express
C.

Will do.DiM wrote:put CPH and MLO on top of eachother or the army numbers will clash on triple digits
