Conquer club saga Mafia! Landgrab won! MUST READ!!!

dustn64 · Post by **dustn64** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:18 am

Skittles! wrote:Actually, after reading through again, I'm going to vote dustn. Nagerous makes good points about him.

What good points?

Iliad · Post by **Iliad** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:21 am

Vote count
Skoffin: 1 jake,
Nagerous : 6 diddle, cena-rules, 0ojakeo0, neutrino, muy_thaiguy, kwanton
Jake 3 McSnipe, TheWeirdOne, Anarkistsdream,
cena rules: 2 kwanton, LSU,
dusn: 4 kalishnikov, nagerous, f1fth, Skittles!
Mr I: 1 dustn
It takes 9 to lynch
I think that's correct

dustn64 · Post by **dustn64** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:25 am

dustn64 wrote:
Skittles! wrote:Actually, after reading through again, I'm going to vote dustn. Nagerous makes good points about him.
What good points?

Do you mean these? The ones that were explained thoroughly by the person I voted for none the less?

mr. incrediball wrote:
nagerous wrote:Scum tells, implying you knew I wasn't in the main mafia and random bandwagoning, unexplained votes on mr incrediball when the game had gone past random votes as we were at a critical conjuction.
if you were in the main mafia, you'd have the sense to not act that scummy

we all wanted jake dead

past random votes? it's day 1 and the only lead is you

what critical conjunction?

F1fth · Post by **F1fth** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:27 am

A person who also voted for Nagerous, who's obviously putting us on.

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:29 am

dustn64 wrote:
dustn64 wrote:
Skittles! wrote:Actually, after reading through again, I'm going to vote dustn. Nagerous makes good points about him.
What good points?
Do you mean these? The ones that were explained thoroughly by the person I voted for none the less?

mr. incrediball wrote:
nagerous wrote:Scum tells, implying you knew I wasn't in the main mafia and random bandwagoning, unexplained votes on mr incrediball when the game had gone past random votes as we were at a critical conjuction.
if you were in the main mafia, you'd have the sense to not act that scummy

we all wanted jake dead

past random votes? it's day 1 and the only lead is you

what critical conjunction?

They're not exactly good points.. I was meaning what nagerous said. whatever, i'd rather lynch someone that hardly contributes, so unvote

dustn64 · Post by **dustn64** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:30 am

F1fth wrote:A person who also voted for Nagerous, who's obviously putting us on.

Huh?

Iliad wrote: Nagerous : 5 diddle, cena-rules, 0ojakeo0, neutrino, muy_thaiguy

F1fth · Post by **F1fth** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:32 am

Ack, my mistake. It was Kwanton who voted for him but wasn't on the list. My bad.

dustn64 · Post by **dustn64** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:34 am

Its nice to know the voters know whats going on...

F1fth · Post by **F1fth** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:36 am

Hey, if I didn't point out the fact that Kwanton's vote should be on Nag, then he might have been hammered and we wouldn't even know it. In fact, I'm too aware for my own good.

F1fth · Post by **F1fth** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:36 am

*See top of page 15*

dustn64 · Post by **dustn64** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:39 am

BTW I just thought of something... Nag (as it seems) is attempting to be lynched. Why would he try to find scum? wouldn't he attempt to lynch town so the town would strike back at him?

dustn64 · Post by **dustn64** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:40 am

Im out for tonight and won't be back until tomorrow. Don't lynch me without me claiming.

F1fth · Post by **F1fth** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:45 am

What I gathered from what he said was that he was unlynchable, and in trying to act overly scummy, he was trying to both spice up the game and to draw scumtells out of the crowd.

But I suppose there's not enough on you to be worth a vote. Unvote Vote McSnipe. You can never trust the quiet ones.

Iliad · Post by **Iliad** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:50 am

Vote count
Skoffin: 1 jake,
Nagerous : 5 diddle, cena-rules, 0ojakeo0, neutrino, muy_thaiguy
Jake 3 McSnipe, TheWeirdOne, Anarkistsdream,
cena rules: 2 kwanton, LSU,
dusn: 2 kalishnikov, nagerous,
Mr I: 1 dustn
McSnipe: 1 f1fth
It takes 9 to lynch
You have until wednesday

F1fth · Post by **F1fth** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:53 am

Iliad wrote:Vote count
Skoffin: 1 jake,
Nagerous : 5 diddle, cena-rules, 0ojakeo0, neutrino, muy_thaiguy
Jake 3 McSnipe, TheWeirdOne, Anarkistsdream,
cena rules: 2 kwanton, LSU,
dusn: 2 kalishnikov, nagerous,
Mr I: 1 dustn
McSnipe: 1 f1fth
It takes 9 to lynch
You have until wednesday

Kwanton's vote should be on Nag, Iliad.

Iliad · Post by **Iliad** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 2:07 am

F1fth wrote:
Iliad wrote:Vote count
Skoffin: 1 jake,
Nagerous : 6 diddle, cena-rules, 0ojakeo0, neutrino, muy_thaiguy, kwanton
Jake 3 McSnipe, TheWeirdOne, Anarkistsdream,
cena rules: 2 kwanton, LSU,
dusn: 2 kalishnikov, nagerous,
Mr I: 1 dustn
McSnipe: 1 f1fth
It takes 9 to lynch
You have until wednesday
Kwanton's vote should be on Nag, Iliad.

it was strange

Skoffin · Post by **Skoffin** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 2:10 am

Argh this is too confusing. Nag is a good player, could he be scum and this an elaborate plot? ..eh probably not, but possible <<
Now didn't someone say he could of been lyncher earlier? Then why did no one think he could be after Dustn?
Ah either way, let's kill someone <<

mr. incrediball · Post by **mr. incrediball** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:50 am

F1fth wrote:What I gathered from what he said was that he was unlynchable, and in trying to act overly scummy, he was trying to both spice up the game and to draw scumtells out of the crowd.

But I suppose there's not enough on you to be worth a vote. Unvote Vote McSnipe. You can never trust the quiet ones.

you seem sure he's unlynchable, but...

[

is he?

mr. incrediball · Post by **mr. incrediball** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:50 am

mr. incrediball wrote:
F1fth wrote:What I gathered from what he said was that he was unlynchable, and in trying to act overly scummy, he was trying to both spice up the game and to draw scumtells out of the crowd.

But I suppose there's not enough on you to be worth a vote. Unvote Vote McSnipe. You can never trust the quiet ones.
you seem sure he's unlynchable, but...

nagerous wrote:I actually have quite a boring role
is he?

EBWOP

LSU Tiger Josh · Post by **LSU Tiger Josh** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 9:27 am

Unvote Vote McSnipe I'm also for lynching one of the inactives and get past this random day 1 crap.

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 9:29 am

Unvote
Vote: Mcsnipe

I also highly suggest these people not be allowed to play in ANY of the good games for awhile.

mr. incrediball · Post by **mr. incrediball** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 9:54 am

Anarkistsdream wrote:Unvote
Vote: Mcsnipe

I also highly suggest these people not be allowed to play in ANY of the good games for awhile.

QFT

unvote vote mcsnipe

nagerous · Post by **nagerous** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 10:58 am

Bump for inactives.

The Weird One · Post by **The Weird One** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 11:19 am

mr. incrediball wrote:
Anarkistsdream wrote:Unvote
Vote: Mcsnipe

I also highly suggest these people not be allowed to play in ANY of the good games for awhile.
QFT

unvote vote mcsnipe

unvote vote mcsnipe

F1fth · Post by **F1fth** » Sun Oct 28, 2007 11:58 am

nagerous on Oct. 24 wrote:YES! FOR I AM THE UNLYNCHABLE!

nagerous on Oct. 27 wrote:Anyway, so what? I'm playing about with my unlynchable role, does that really make me a bad person? I feel like its produced a good lead with dustn that I would like to follow up and the rest of the town should if they had any cajones .

Yes, he said it twice, and there's three days between these posts. Like I said, he's either unlynchable, a jester, or this is the best damn WIFOM in the history of the game.

Anyway, vote McSnipe guys.