More experts say Gov. is lying about 911

muy_thaiguy · Post by **muy_thaiguy** » Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:24 pm

jay_a2j wrote:Number of times the "911 Conspiracy Theory" has been debunked = Countless, countless times

Number of conspiricists that won't listen to reason in the US = Well, 1 is to damn many

Realizing that if the government was actually like that, then why aren't they dead as well, and realizing that you've been making an ass of yourself = Priceless.

I believe that is better. And more factual.

Napoleon Ier · Post by **Napoleon Ier** » Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:35 pm

muy_thaiguy wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:Number of times the "911 Conspiracy Theory" has been debunked = Countless, countless times

Number of conspiricists that won't listen to reason in the US = Well, 1 is to damn many

Realizing that if the government was actually like that, then why aren't they dead as well, and realizing that you've been making an ass of yourself = Priceless.
I believe that is better. And more factual.

I think we ought to give him a break...dissproving these ludicrous theories over and over and then using them against him when he does make a good point about politics is just pompous intellectual arrogance.

muy_thaiguy · Post by **muy_thaiguy** » Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:39 pm

Napoleon Ier wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:Number of times the "911 Conspiracy Theory" has been debunked = Countless, countless times

Number of conspiricists that won't listen to reason in the US = Well, 1 is to damn many

Realizing that if the government was actually like that, then why aren't they dead as well, and realizing that you've been making an ass of yourself = Priceless.
I believe that is better. And more factual.
I think we ought to give him a break...dissproving these ludicrous theories over and over and then using them against him when he does make a good point about politics is just pompous intellectual arrogance.

Well, reviving these old threads kind of annoyed me a bit, because then they get out of hand with these threads.

Frigidus · Post by **Frigidus** » Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:42 pm

muy_thaiguy wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:Number of times the "911 Conspiracy Theory" has been debunked = Countless, countless times

Number of conspiricists that won't listen to reason in the US = Well, 1 is to damn many

Realizing that if the government was actually like that, then why aren't they dead as well, and realizing that you've been making an ass of yourself = Priceless.
I believe that is better. And more factual.
I think we ought to give him a break...dissproving these ludicrous theories over and over and then using them against him when he does make a good point about politics is just pompous intellectual arrogance.
Well, reviving these old threads kind of annoyed me a bit, because then they get out of hand with these threads.

Agreed, I still get a chill every time I see xtra's name as the author...

Napoleon Ier · Post by **Napoleon Ier** » Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:42 pm

muy_thaiguy wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:Number of times the "911 Conspiracy Theory" has been debunked = Countless, countless times

Number of conspiricists that won't listen to reason in the US = Well, 1 is to damn many

Realizing that if the government was actually like that, then why aren't they dead as well, and realizing that you've been making an ass of yourself = Priceless.
I believe that is better. And more factual.
I think we ought to give him a break...dissproving these ludicrous theories over and over and then using them against him when he does make a good point about politics is just pompous intellectual arrogance.
Well, reviving these old threads kind of annoyed me a bit, because then they get out of hand with these threads.

True. Jay ought, and I am giving friendly advice, debate about american politics and not bring in conspiracy theories. It discredits the sensible points that you make about Ron Paul and makes it too easy for the insecure debaters to use your beliefs against you out of context,

Frigidus · Post by **Frigidus** » Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:08 pm

Napoleon Ier wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:Number of times the "911 Conspiracy Theory" has been debunked = Countless, countless times

Number of conspiricists that won't listen to reason in the US = Well, 1 is to damn many

Realizing that if the government was actually like that, then why aren't they dead as well, and realizing that you've been making an ass of yourself = Priceless.
I believe that is better. And more factual.
I think we ought to give him a break...dissproving these ludicrous theories over and over and then using them against him when he does make a good point about politics is just pompous intellectual arrogance.
Well, reviving these old threads kind of annoyed me a bit, because then they get out of hand with these threads.
True. Jay ought, and I am giving friendly advice, debate about american politics and not bring in conspiracy theories. It discredits the sensible points that you make about Ron Paul and makes it too easy for the insecure debaters to use your beliefs against you out of context,

Of course to be fair DaGip bumped this one, but hey, the idea still applies.

Dancing Mustard · Post by **Dancing Mustard** » Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:37 pm

Is it really unfair to keep raising Jay's bizzare conspiracy theories in threads about politics?

Jay's willingness to believe ridiculous conspiracy theories, even in the weight of overwhelming evidence to debunk them = demonstrative of his propensity to reach, and cling to, irrational stupid points of view.

Jay preaching about a ridiculous candidate, even in the weight of overwhelming evidence to show the man is an unelectable sidewhow = Jay demonstrating his propensity to reach, and cling to, irrational stupid points of view.

Looks to me like his behaivour in the first type of thread is 100% relevant to his behaivour in the second, and can quite legitimately be used to attack his credibility therein. But hey, maybe that's just me...

Backglass · Post by **Backglass** » Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:27 pm

Are we back to this again?

How many times must we throw logic and fact in the face of these wacko theorists?

Jay...give it up. We were attacked, and not by our own countrymen. You really need to stop sniffing the dust in those old bibles of yours...I think it might be lead paint.

DaGip · Post by **DaGip** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 12:41 am

Frigidus wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:Number of times the "911 Conspiracy Theory" has been debunked = Countless, countless times

Number of conspiricists that won't listen to reason in the US = Well, 1 is to damn many

Realizing that if the government was actually like that, then why aren't they dead as well, and realizing that you've been making an ass of yourself = Priceless.
I believe that is better. And more factual.
I think we ought to give him a break...dissproving these ludicrous theories over and over and then using them against him when he does make a good point about politics is just pompous intellectual arrogance.
Well, reviving these old threads kind of annoyed me a bit, because then they get out of hand with these threads.
True. Jay ought, and I am giving friendly advice, debate about american politics and not bring in conspiracy theories. It discredits the sensible points that you make about Ron Paul and makes it too easy for the insecure debaters to use your beliefs against you out of context,
Of course to be fair DaGip bumped this one, but hey, the idea still applies.

I bumped some of these old threads because someone posted a 9-11 conspiracy thread, that way for those who wanted to actually debate this issue, they would have a little past info to work on...only reason why I bumped this thread. To bad xtra can't be here

unriggable · Post by **unriggable** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:50 am

The bastard wouldn't shut up. He deserved it.

Guiscard · Post by **Guiscard** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 8:35 am

DaGip wrote:I bumped some of these old threads because someone posted a 9-11 conspiracy thread, that way for those who wanted to actually debate this issue, they would have a little past info to work on...only reason why I bumped this thread. To bad xtra can't be here

You're debating the issue? f*ck me... Its not a definition of debate I've ever heard!

Frigidus · Post by **Frigidus** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 9:10 am

Once again I find myself linking to Maddox.

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=af07

Sums up Loose Change.

heavycola · Post by **heavycola** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 9:22 am

Frigidus wrote:Once again I find myself linking to Maddox.

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=af07

Sums up Loose Change.

Dekloren · Post by **Dekloren** » Thu Mar 06, 2008 3:15 pm

9/11 was an inside job!!

Backglass · Post by **Backglass** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 7:24 pm

Dekloren wrote:9/11 was an inside job!!

9/11 was an attack!!

Dekloren · Post by **Dekloren** » Fri Mar 14, 2008 8:32 pm

An attack on liberty and freedom!

suggs · Post by **suggs** » Fri Mar 14, 2008 8:37 pm

Yes. Yes it was dekloren.
And now its time for the pretty BLUE pill.

Backglass · Post by **Backglass** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 11:57 am

Dekloren wrote:An attack on liberty and freedom!

reminisco · Post by **reminisco** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 12:49 pm

suggs wrote:Yes. Yes it was dekloren.
And now its time for the pretty BLUE pill.

yes, they've upped his dose of Valium to the BLUE pill instead of the orange. good idea.

heavycola · Post by **heavycola** » Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:44 pm

reminisco wrote:
suggs wrote:Yes. Yes it was dekloren.
And now its time for the pretty BLUE pill.
yes, they've upped his dose of Valium to the BLUE pill instead of the orange. good idea.

who the hell are they?