Moderator: Community Team
Huh? Maybe the first one was suspicious as he didn't give any reasons, but the second one surely can't be called random?sam_levi_11 wrote:Vote Falko, he is still random voting, as is shown by his hasty vote onto pmc before switching to stroop.
The second one he covered up for it. I think he did the noob thing of thinking we would ignore it. Anyway, just trying to spark discussion with the little we have... Btw where is everyone?pmchugh wrote:Huh? Maybe the first one was suspicious as he didn't give any reasons, but the second one surely can't be called random?sam_levi_11 wrote:Vote Falko, he is still random voting, as is shown by his hasty vote onto pmc before switching to stroop.
I am wondering the same thing.sam_levi_11 wrote:... Btw where is everyone?
EBWOP please. You have been warned.Nzen wrote: (I had to edit this post because I input the quote end tags wrong. It didn't split Ace's blurb from pmcugh's)
I assume you mean vote count and not water closet, because if you mean the latter, then I can not help you.Thezzaruz wrote:Could we have a WC?
Spelling skillz at their best tonight.Suspect101 wrote: I assume you mean vote count and not water closet, because if you mean the latter, then I can not help you.
Page 13 is where pmc voted me, so you'll find my arguments for not lynching me from there on.thischarmingman wrote:i still have no real bias towards either argument so i am gonna leave it to stroop to prove to me i shouldnt vote for him ill check back in in like 12 hours hope you have some good arguments for me
So why haven't you voted for someone on your list instead of sam?Falkomagno wrote:People, looks who is openly admitting not to be a 3rd party and lynch¡
This was pmc's case against gimpyThewonder at the start of Day 2. I don't believe anyone actually voted for gimpyThewonder based on this yet. Reproduced below is gimpy's response to the argument against him.pmchugh wrote: As for gimpy, his reasons for voting sam:
Reasons for voting simon:gimpyThewonder wrote:vote sam if for no other reason than it seems to be the consensus and someone has to die to gain us some infoIt seems he is desperate for a lynch, is this scummy? Yes and no, because as a townie you want a lynch to gain info and as scum if you see a chance to off someone not in your group your not going to pass it up. Your reasoning is fine enough but it still seems suspicious to me, more for the way you said it than what you actually said.gimpyThewonder wrote:does that mean the deadline is closed or close?
if it isn't too late i'll switch my vote unvot vote simon just to get a succesful lynch and draw day 1 shenanigins to a close
I agree that it is good to lynch on Day 1 to gain some info, but the since entire point of mafia is to lynch the mafia, it matters who is lynched. On Day 1, you didn't seem to care at all who was lynched, you just added to the bandwagon of whoever had the most votes at the time, stating that somebody needed to die to gain info. Scum don't care who is lynched because all they want is to get into the night without getting lynched. The argument that you know what you are doing and would not be on the tail end of a lynch holds no weight. It is a huge ball of WIFOM.gimpyThewonder wrote:pmc your logic makes sense in terms of who to look at but you neglected this post i made:
where I basically outline what you say 2 posts later.gimpyThewonder wrote:look we all know that day 1 rarely catches out scum. what it does is give us information to work w/. someone has to be the sacrificial lamb, it's the way the game is played. the fact that Simon has yet to defend himself looks, well, bad. is it enough for a lynch? for Day 1, you bet it is. now i'm not going to throw the axiom of wanting a no lynch your way b/c your argument was sound and i enjoy logical pleas, but between lynching a townie for info or letting him live while the scult recruits/kills for free tonight while we gain nothing? it shouldn't be a difficult decision really.
additionally, had I really been scum you wouldn't have seen me on the tail end of a lynch, its not my 1st rodeo
That's monumentally stupid though, the main fantasia characters will not be 3rd party.Falkomagno wrote: People, looks who is openly admitting not to be a 3rd party and lynch¡
Thinking about it it's actually stupid enough to warrant a Vote Falkomango.Thezzaruz wrote:That's monumentally stupid though, the main fantasia characters will not be 3rd party.Falkomagno wrote: People, looks who is openly admitting not to be a 3rd party and lynch¡
Another thing about this is that if you only lynch non-third party members, the mafia will recruit third party members, and then these mafia members will be safe from lynching.Thezzaruz wrote:That's monumentally stupid though, the main fantasia characters will not be 3rd party.Falkomagno wrote: People, looks who is openly admitting not to be a 3rd party and lynch¡