Moderator: Community Team
AgreedRodion wrote: I don't think that is the right way of measuring inactivity
Alright, well thats either 2 or 3 depending on where SG7's is (I think he switched it to milkshake). Either way, I wont be here at the deadline because I will be in school when it comes, but if you guys decide to lynch me I guess thats your decision. I will warn you that my Side A is not that powerful, and that killing me on this side does not affect my side B role.jonty125 wrote:AgreedRodion wrote: I don't think that is the right way of measuring inactivity
Anyhow vote new guy1 he's hasn't done much and has only posted fluff recently.
You posted 9 or 10 times between the two threads over the course of 4 hours. I understand RL stuff happens, but you easily had enough time last night to put some effort into this game if you wanted to. Just saying.new guy1 wrote:Completely understand the feeling edoc... just saying.

Just saying, that game is in startup. It was mostly fluff, and we had conversation I could follow along with. This game is just confusing. I posted that we should trust rodion's word in the wrong forum, I meant it to be here.drunkmonkey wrote:You posted 9 or 10 times between the two threads over the course of 4 hours. I understand RL stuff happens, but you easily had enough time last night to put some effort into this game if you wanted to. Just saying.new guy1 wrote:Completely understand the feeling edoc... just saying.
D2 is less than four pages long.shieldgenerator7 wrote:Okay on this side jonty's getting lynched. I forget why. DM could you remind me?

fine, I'll read back. ...*reading back*...drunkmonkey wrote:D2 is less than four pages long.shieldgenerator7 wrote:Okay on this side jonty's getting lynched. I forget why. DM could you remind me?
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
That was 1/3 of jonty's reasoning, and actually the one I didn't call him out for.shieldgenerator7 wrote:fine, I'll read back. ...*reading back*...drunkmonkey wrote:D2 is less than four pages long.shieldgenerator7 wrote:Okay on this side jonty's getting lynched. I forget why. DM could you remind me?
Ok so it seems that you're case on jonty is that he oposed Rodion's plan because of its lack of third-parties. Is that right? Or am I missing something?
-SG7 ()
It seemed like a textbook bandwagon vote. When asked to explain his reasoning, he admitted to the 3 reasons I asked about. Look at the last two reasons:drunkmonkey wrote:I thought I made it quite obvious that parts 2 and 3 were awful reasons to cast a vote. 1 is shaky. I was expecting you to respond by clarifying the real reasons you voted. The last thing I expected was "yep, you got it - I think he's scummy because he wants mafia to concede and for something I'm pretending he said".jonty125 wrote:Other than I can't see the gain of the plan, you got it all.drunkmonkey wrote:
So, your position seems to be that Rodion is scummy because:
1) His plan didn't allow for 3rd party players
2) He's asking some people (mafia) to give up one of the two games
3) You think somehow claiming T/T means you'll be cleared if you flip town in one game, which Rodion never said.
This is a very weak case, IMO. Did I miss anything?
jonty125 wrote:Take this scenario: I am town/mafia. I could say town/town and then suicide as town where I was town and if I came under pressure as mafia I could say, look I'm a truthful guy - I must be town.

I know he said nothing about T/T but I was thinking on how other people could try and manipulate the manipulator.drunkmonkey wrote:That was 1/3 of jonty's reasoning, and actually the one I didn't call him out for.shieldgenerator7 wrote:fine, I'll read back. ...*reading back*...drunkmonkey wrote:D2 is less than four pages long.shieldgenerator7 wrote:Okay on this side jonty's getting lynched. I forget why. DM could you remind me?
Ok so it seems that you're case on jonty is that he oposed Rodion's plan because of its lack of third-parties. Is that right? Or am I missing something?
-SG7 ()
It seemed like a textbook bandwagon vote. When asked to explain his reasoning, he admitted to the 3 reasons I asked about. Look at the last two reasons:drunkmonkey wrote:I thought I made it quite obvious that parts 2 and 3 were awful reasons to cast a vote. 1 is shaky. I was expecting you to respond by clarifying the real reasons you voted. The last thing I expected was "yep, you got it - I think he's scummy because he wants mafia to concede and for something I'm pretending he said".jonty125 wrote:Other than I can't see the gain of the plan, you got it all.drunkmonkey wrote:
So, your position seems to be that Rodion is scummy because:
1) His plan didn't allow for 3rd party players
2) He's asking some people (mafia) to give up one of the two games
3) You think somehow claiming T/T means you'll be cleared if you flip town in one game, which Rodion never said.
This is a very weak case, IMO. Did I miss anything?
2) Rodion tried to trick mafia into confessing. Why in the world would that be a lynchable offense?
3) Rodion only offered a deal to those who claimed M/T. Never anything to T/T claims. Yet jonty created his own interpretation of the plan, and used something Rodion never said as a reason to paint him as scummy:jonty125 wrote:Take this scenario: I am town/mafia. I could say town/town and then suicide as town where I was town and if I came under pressure as mafia I could say, look I'm a truthful guy - I must be town.
Rodion wrote:I don't think that is the right way of measuring inactivity. How about you check the content of the posts instead? I believe Edocsil only made 1 post here about an inactive lynch being better than our current batting average, but before he made that post he was the most inactive player. For lack of content, also check Something Clever New Guy. I'll try to review them either now or tomorrow morning/beginning of the afternoon.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Agreeing that we should pressure a submariner.edocsil wrote:Couldn't be worse then our current batting avg sadly.safariguy5 wrote:Alright, I suppose that claim makes sense. No point in pursuing a lynch here until we see how Side B plays out.
unvote
So what do we want to do on this side? Pressure a submariner?
Saying he is not as inactive as I mentioned. Claimed being inactive in all other games as a defense (I have to check the other games to compare).edocsil wrote:I haven't been THAT inactive, certainly no worse here than elsewhere. IRL is catching up to me more then a bit.Rodion wrote:
I don't think that is the right way of measuring inactivity. How about you check the content of the posts instead? I believe Edocsil only made 1 post here about an inactive lynch being better than our current batting average, but before he made that post he was the most inactive player. For lack of content, also check Something Clever New Guy. I'll try to review them either now or tomorrow morning/beginning of the afternoon.
As far as letting Jonty die, his D2 Side B posts make me think he is the vig/SK that shot me (with Soundman being killed by mafia). We should be able to have more insight into that tomorrow, but I don't think he's mafia so I see no problem letting him live as long as we can define a target by tomorrow.
"Vig should not claim in an ideal world, but realistically it may be necessary".new guy1 wrote:I agree with jonty. I do not believe the vig should claim. But on a related not, I agree with Rodion in the aspect that if we can not push the game on by other means, it may be nessessary.
Talking about B side, I suppose.new guy1 wrote:In the Sully vs VS cases, I think rodion made a better case against VS, but because VS called him out and stated he was third party, I would say thats kind of compelling evidence... I would still like a claim from Rodion, if he thinks enough pressure has been put on him.
100% fluff.new guy1 wrote:I find it odd that all the talking day one was in this forum and now its all in the other one o.Oshieldgenerator7 wrote:lshicastr This forum would be nothing without you guys(appreciation repricated)
Yeah I know that confused me too. I was about to make a case on PCM for inactivity and then I remembered he was dead.SO yeah there's no case on inactivites right now because there really are none on this side. I suppose there's none on the other side either but I'll have to check it out
-SG7 ()
Forces me to cross-check Side B. Maybe more on that later, but don't hold your breath as I might be busy in the next few hours.new guy1 wrote:I gave my opinion in the other forum. Its not completly useless, just doesnt add anything new, which you can call almost everyone out on that.
"Real life gets in the way".new guy1 wrote:Completely understand the feeling edoc... just saying.
Here he gives some insight on his role.new guy1 wrote:Alright, well thats either 2 or 3 depending on where SG7's is (I think he switched it to milkshake). Either way, I wont be here at the deadline because I will be in school when it comes, but if you guys decide to lynch me I guess thats your decision. I will warn you that my Side A is not that powerful, and that killing me on this side does not affect my side B role.jonty125 wrote:AgreedRodion wrote: I don't think that is the right way of measuring inactivity
Anyhow vote new guy1 he's hasn't done much and has only posted fluff recently.
EBWOP.new guy1 wrote:Sorry, thats one vote, was thinking of side B
I'm not contributing because this game is confusing, again mentions Side B.new guy1 wrote:Just saying, that game is in startup. It was mostly fluff, and we had conversation I could follow along with. This game is just confusing. I posted that we should trust rodion's word in the wrong forum, I meant it to be here.drunkmonkey wrote:You posted 9 or 10 times between the two threads over the course of 4 hours. I understand RL stuff happens, but you easily had enough time last night to put some effort into this game if you wanted to. Just saying.new guy1 wrote:Completely understand the feeling edoc... just saying.
Skims Side B and makes a question whose answer is already clear.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:this post confused me..how do you know that you were shotRodion wrote:Soundman protected me.
PCM did not swap me around.
I was shot.
Soundman was shot.
2 shots (other than PCM's which we assume to have been shot from Side B) can mean:
mafia+SK
mafia+vig
2 mafias
I could be cleared by having a vigilante claim they targeted Soundman (which means mafia targeted me), but maybe we don't even have one.
Anyway, down 3 townies, 9 left in what could be a 6-3 or a 5-3-1 (or 5-2-2 if there are 2 mafias out there?). To top things off, losing 3 power roles capable of protecting makes massclaiming an even riskier plan than it would normally be.
Being that we have 7 days (6 and a half now) to get something done, I'll suggest that the vigilante claims (assuming we have one) if we make no advance in the next 48 hours.
On with the game: who's scummiest and why?
Posting because of prod and drops a one-line on VS being suspicious.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:prod recieved, sorry would have posted but wasnt at school todayshieldgenerator7 wrote:I... didn't get why the vig claiming would be beneficial.
But I do want to hear from Sully, as of currently he is the current lynch target.
anyway i agree sully seems suspicious but right now i really dont have any other thoughts on him
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
After this, most of what they post are one-liners of fluff or agreement. Edoc said something about being suspicious of shield but it was only one D1 post on Side A so I assume the rest of the conversation happened on Side B.edocsil wrote:The difference is that I am actively accusing him of manipulating the scenario to hes benefit. You merely state that he is wrong.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:uhh edocsil you said the same thing I did lol
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
I would go with either C or E (obviously I wouldn't go for BRodion wrote: Our lynching options seem to be:
a) Monkey's case on Jonty for having flawed reasoning.
b) PCM's case on Shield.
c) Edocsil on inactivity.
d) New Guy on inactivity.
e) Clever on inactivity.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Why are you talking about yourself in 3rd person?shieldgenerator7 wrote:Ok I went thorugh D1 and looked at edoc's and clever's posts (BTW you know how easy it is to miss clever's posts? He takes up like only 100 pixels, no avatar no sig or nothing!)
Edoc and clever from the get-go oppose ROdion's plan (along with many others), the difference being that:After this, most of what they post are one-liners of fluff or agreement. Edoc said something about being suspicious of shield but it was only one D1 post on Side A so I assume the rest of the conversation happened on Side B.edocsil wrote:The difference is that I am actively accusing him of manipulating the scenario to hes benefit. You merely state that he is wrong.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:uhh edocsil you said the same thing I did lol
Meta-gaming, I would say that edoc posts one-liners as a way to appear active while not helping town much. He seems to lead the discussion more when he's town, and I think he's mafia here because he seems to be sitting back (or maybe this is due to the presence of otehr great players like Rodion, PCM, and saf; and hence no need for him to come forward).
Clever seems to post more fluff than edoc during D1, but I'm more suspicious of edoc at this point because of meta-gaming reasons. THoughts?
-SG7 ()
To make you ask that questionjonty125 wrote:Why are you talking about yourself in 3rd person?shieldgenerator7 wrote:Ok I went thorugh D1 and looked at edoc's and clever's posts (BTW you know how easy it is to miss clever's posts? He takes up like only 100 pixels, no avatar no sig or nothing!)
Edoc and clever from the get-go oppose ROdion's plan (along with many others), the difference being that:After this, most of what they post are one-liners of fluff or agreement. Edoc said something about being suspicious of shield but it was only one D1 post on Side A so I assume the rest of the conversation happened on Side B.edocsil wrote:The difference is that I am actively accusing him of manipulating the scenario to hes benefit. You merely state that he is wrong.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:uhh edocsil you said the same thing I did lol
Meta-gaming, I would say that edoc posts one-liners as a way to appear active while not helping town much. He seems to lead the discussion more when he's town, and I think he's mafia here because he seems to be sitting back (or maybe this is due to the presence of otehr great players like Rodion, PCM, and saf; and hence no need for him to come forward).
Clever seems to post more fluff than edoc during D1, but I'm more suspicious of edoc at this point because of meta-gaming reasons. THoughts?
-SG7 ()
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.

I assure you that I will try to increase the quality of my posts as the game goes on.safariguy5 wrote:I'd like to pressure clever mainly because he has had only 2 posts AND neither of them are that useful. With edoc and new guy, at least they have more posts. I assume content will pick up once the game moves on a bit.
unvote vote somethingclever
I just lived up to my name/ wrote:the town was mostly separated that day, paranoia and suspicion kept them from getting anything significant done, but three of them went out to kill a person of their suspicion, and one went out to stop them. All seven involved met in the bar and started calling each other out, they drank and brawled, until one of them pulled their gun and fired.
The result...
Night Two Starts, send in your actions, Deadline Friday!Spoiler
Unfortunately, random.org hates me, and thus loves you all![]()
no lynch tonight
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.