Moderator: Community Team
Which names did you mess up? I'm confused on both. There is no push on Wings and mtam has been MIA. I'm not going to lynch you for skimming/misreading I'm going to lynch you for not clarifying on ANYTHING I've asked you. What you've done since I've posted is: accuse me not having any logic behind my list (because you didn't read my first two posts) and vote me for it, then you tried to clarify that you thought my list was illogical because of some voting/pushing issues (which you messed up BOTH names) and now you say you messed up, but still won't clarify (because what you said made no sense) and then unvote me and accuse me of trying to lynch you for misreading/skimming. FTR I voted Storr over you because I wanted to lynch him more, I just happened to also think you were scum and now all you've done since then is reaffirm that belief.Streaker wrote:Yeah Unvote and just lynch me for skimming/misreading.
It makes a lot more sense if I don't mess up those names.
I have not twisted your words. I questioned why you thought I would refer to that push, that is dead. I also gave my thoughts on the scenario which you were referring to that push... (I was not sure why you would refer to it, I thought you must have some names confused) ...which you were doing. My reasons for thinking you were scum are in my second post on page 11 where I had multiple comments on some of your posts, you seem to have still not read that.Streaker wrote:I don't see the issue. I caught something that stood out, but it was based on a mis-read.
Thought you were referring to Mtam push on wing early game. Mitch has nothing to do with it.
Never accused you of anything apart from the illogical conclusion, so stop twisting my words (which you have done 2x now already).
Also you have failed to provide any reason for why you think I'm scum.
If you have any real questions, i'll happily answer them.

Ok, don't tell us. But you seem pretty convinced about things that could go a few ways. You say mitch is not Rand? If he didn't do much research, I can see 2 things in his posts that suggest he might be. You say you know that Storr's role is town? I can think of a case for a 3rd party who corrupts those who take his gifts, and might potentially win when half the vote is controlled. I could potentially see a case for a scum with the role (evil merchant), but I feel like that one is a bit of a stretch. Further, the town character only really gives one kind of item - I'm not sure where this multiple items thing is coming from. For the time being, I'm still leaning town with Storr, and I do think that it's the character I think you think he is.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Anyone actually think I should explain my understanding of flavour? I think not. Yes I have a very good idea who Storr and Madmitch are. This I have gained from research. No I dont think I should actually tell you.
I believe he is Town but question some things and worry about others? That answer work for you?Streaker wrote:There is a big difference between how HS and Mitch reacted to their 'trade'. While it was wrong to ask for a specific power in a post, I did came back to it and asked HS to confirm whether or not it is a 'pro' town power.
Is there any reason to not punish Mitch for how he is already claiming and yet not saying anything? He is currently hiding behind his soft-claim and not contributing. My vote is ment to get some posts from him. There is nothing wrong with being the 3rd or 5th or whatever on the wagon at this point, not when I explained my reasoning behind it.
I sheep other player' questions if they are worth being answered, but not actually being answered.
What exactly is so unclear about my answers?
I clearly explained my vote, and how I saw it. Yes it was based on certain names being switched, and I backed off the moment I realized that mistake. That doesnt make the reasoning flawed.
You are twisting my words, even just now recently when you said that I accused you of trying to lynch me for misreading/skimming.
Now for the sake of clarity, if ANYTHING is still unclear to you, spill it out.
IB, what are you trying to achieve with your breakdown of Storr?
I feel that his role is something like 3rd party. I seriously doubt mafia would have a role like that, has to be either 3rd party or town.
FP'd wing

I finally get what you are saying Mitch but it is day one. By claiming day one you received a power role that will 100% benefit town really only has two outcomes in my mind.madmitch wrote:@IB please listen this time my vote was not taken it was my choice to trade. I could of refused the offer but it was in my mind a good deal that would benefit myself and town 100 % @ streaker I am not sitting behind a soft claim
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!

Apart from proving yourself town, who you wanna lynch?StorrZerg wrote:not interested in dd5 lynch, barking up the wrong tree he is. He put a lot of effort into trying to lynch me which the big thing he has is assuming i got all my day information in 1 pm. As well as assuming it came in on the same day. There is an obvious explanation for why my attitude changed regarding hotshot when it did, and why it was so long in between When i first made comments about hotshots vote steal, and when i claimed to be responsible.
absolutely not. At some point imake take control of the votes and do as i wish since that is perfectly within reason for me, how ever i see no reason to not allow people to still use their votes. Its important that accountability is still had on hotshot and madmitch. Since they have no vote, maybe they input less, complain about no vote, etc. giving them the option to still use and do as they wish with their vote, means that im not manipulating the votes. As for their alignment, 1 mafia vote isn't going to kill us if one is mafia, and it will be fair easier to try and catch someone with honest voting history, than if they have no voting history. ANd obviously they should have more input than you for tons of reasons. 1 i have no read on you so why would i ever listen to you. 2 we went into a trade agreement, they know something about me, and i have something of theirs. 3, by forcing them to vote i can then try and read how they are playing the game since im still leaving control over their votes. and manyyy moooreee.This doesn't make any sense. They're your votes, use them to vote the way you believe. Especially given the possibility that they're mafia, you shouldn't give them any special consideration in determining where they go. Said another way, why should Hotshot have any more say in where his vote goes than I do, after it has been traded? They knew the risks involved in losing their vote in return for the item/ability.
buying town credit or not, would you rather them retain some control over their vote or not? Simply the answer is yes since you seem to think im mafia.Trying to buy more townie cred by letting them have input?
Save for the part where claiming mod interaction to bolster your cred when you are being deceptive about it is bs. I do have a code that i live up to, and this is not anything that i would pull to try and get a read,or try and gain town credit. Regardless of my alignment this game, what im claiming about the msgs is truth. I don't make up this stuff.To me the initial exchange seems like something Storr would do to gain town cred and then later he can say that he didn't get a message until later on and now he is confirmed town because of the powers he gave out. This is Storr guys all he does is make bold moves and play mind games.

Apart from having proved myself as town, Virus. We have approached past the half way point of this day phase, and Virus has provided zilch to the game.Streaker wrote:Apart from proving yourself town, who you wanna lynch?StorrZerg wrote:not interested in dd5 lynch, barking up the wrong tree he is. He put a lot of effort into trying to lynch me which the big thing he has is assuming i got all my day information in 1 pm. As well as assuming it came in on the same day. There is an obvious explanation for why my attitude changed regarding hotshot when it did, and why it was so long in between When i first made comments about hotshots vote steal, and when i claimed to be responsible.


Virus made an extensive post, though. P7. He hasn't posted a lot, but he never does. I think it's a pretty standard D1 as far as activity goes, and he did bring up all of his thoughts in that post. Wouldn't hurt him to follow up on that now.StorrZerg wrote:Apart from having proved myself as town, Virus. We have approached past the half way point of this day phase, and Virus has provided zilch to the game.Streaker wrote:Apart from proving yourself town, who you wanna lynch?StorrZerg wrote:not interested in dd5 lynch, barking up the wrong tree he is. He put a lot of effort into trying to lynch me which the big thing he has is assuming i got all my day information in 1 pm. As well as assuming it came in on the same day. There is an obvious explanation for why my attitude changed regarding hotshot when it did, and why it was so long in between When i first made comments about hotshots vote steal, and when i claimed to be responsible.
Don't mind pressure on many others, but i made list of those I'm not interested in pressuring.
So you are mainly interested in whatever keeps you alive the longest? Interesting.StorrZerg wrote:If you want a quick day 2, everyone visit me, it's going to be fun
@wing would I live longer if I claimed 3p?
Again I don't want to lynch dd15 over his push on me

