fp'd by mitch... mitch, would you believe me if I tell you I'll target you tonight and if you die that will confirm my claim?
Moderator: Community Team
The one who said their 2WC was to lynch a water type was rish. Who may have been (and probably was) lying about that.dakky21 wrote:AoG someone said before, don't have time now to search for post, that their 2nd WC is being on a lynch on a water pokemon, so why did you disclose that info? I don't want to say I'm water, maybe I am, maybe I'm not... it gives reason to vote you even if you aren't scum... 2nd WC's are cruel.:
To me, seeing a town die and saying your luck was good is like saying that your alignment DID flip, and you became SK and met your 2nd wincon. Which is extra strange, since why would you confess to the possibility of becoming 3P in the first place? That said, I have a suspicion of what you are... and what you might become.dakky21 wrote:I tested my luck and it ended good.
As to my ability: No IB did not have to die for my 2nd win condition but I did have to use it to fulfill part of my 2nd win condition. I gave the PR to IB because of the reasons I stated yesterday in regards to being somewhat suspicious of him and trying to use it to create a scum slip. The main objective of my 2nd win condition is to live for the thread to get to page 25 (a condition I admit I haven't been doing much to improve. Sorry). DY gave me the addendum of using my action as well but it was that the person had to slip up at least once. Likewise I did not use my ability last night. I cannot completely rule out further action regarding it but for the time being I have no plans to use it again.madmitch wrote:@ AOG , I also believe Dakky is lying about him being VIG, I have info that he is not a murderer so maybe he is just trying to get him self hung on day 2 ? I was told about Tim and his surf board , so that is all I can say at the moment.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Thanks mitch, that does help a little. I also thought of a reason why dakky might want to be lynched - if he's lynched now as town, then he stays town and wins with town. If he flips over to SK, and we lynch him or mafia takes him out, then he loses his primary wincon. His character is also likely not what I thought it was in my last post. Also, I will say that my personal wincon is not a 2-part wincon.madmitch wrote:Anybody else have a two part 2nd w\c ? sounds scummy to me, to help town I will reveal all I know, I am Detective Charizard N1 told Tim was electric pokemon with surfboard, N2 told Dakky was a sad pokemon with violent moods more likely a broken hearted fool than a murderer , now I hope someone protects me so I can keep investigating
mitch wasn't asking if you had one - everyone has one. mitch was asking if anyone besides strike has a 2-or-more part personal wincon.Army of GOD wrote:I have a second win condition but it is already failed
1. I didn't see a town die? That post was not about BuJaber, I didn't hammer him. I hammered Rish and he was scum. So it turned good.Marashu wrote:There is definitely something strange about dakky's claim. Not being able to use the NK until N2 is strange, but it also explains why he was in such a rush to get N2 to happen. That said, I want to know why you saidTo me, seeing a town die and saying your luck was good is like saying that your alignment DID flip, and you became SK and met your 2nd wincon. Which is extra strange, since why would you confess to the possibility of becoming 3P in the first place? That said, I have a suspicion of what you are... and what you might become.dakky21 wrote:I tested my luck and it ended good.
Could you please tell us why you chose to kill Tim over the other 7 players you "narrowed it down to"?
Ah. At first I saw that as you meaning that you had something good happen during the night. Then I saw it as you meaning that you tested your luck with your kill, and your luck was good because you stayed town. I understand what you mean now.dakky21 wrote: 1. I didn't see a town die? That post was not about BuJaber, I didn't hammer him. I hammered Rish and he was scum. So it turned good.

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
Exactly, but do the math. If there were 4 mafia out of 14 players, that means it's currently 9 alive players, out of which 3 are scum. So currently it is probably 6v3. With me lynched and one NK, that will leave town at 4 vs 3. That means tomorrow is LYLO. If you lynch scum today, even with my bad or good kill, tomorrow you will at worst have 4v2 or 3v2v1 if I morph to SK. I don't think 3 scum are possible in this setup, while 5 could be, but it's probably 4. If it's 5 scum, then we're already at LYLO as lynching me and NK will bring town to 3 people vs 4 scum.mandalorian2298 wrote:Ok, here is the deal: You are in an army that is currently at war. You go to a neutral town to have a drink when a drunken solider at the next table start waving his gun around and threatening that he'll kill everyone. Do you check which army he belongs to? No, you shoot him because he is dangerous no matter his allegiance.
*does the math*dakky21 wrote:Exactly, but do the math. If there were 4 mafia out of 14 players, that means it's currently 9 alive players, out of which 3 are scum.mandalorian2298 wrote:Ok, here is the deal: You are in an army that is currently at war. You go to a neutral town to have a drink when a drunken solider at the next table start waving his gun around and threatening that he'll kill everyone. Do you check which army he belongs to? No, you shoot him because he is dangerous no matter his allegiance.

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
EBWOPmandalorian2298 wrote:*does the math*dakky21 wrote:Exactly, but do the math. If there were 4 mafia out of 14 players, that means it's currently 9 alive players, out of which 3 are scum.mandalorian2298 wrote:Ok, here is the deal: You are in an army that is currently at war. You go to a neutral town to have a drink when a drunken solider at the next table start waving his gun around and threatening that he'll kill everyone. Do you check which army he belongs to? No, you shoot him because he is dangerous no matter his allegiance.
Ok, I've done it. It appears that there are in fact 10 players alive.
Furthermore, since mathematicaly speaking, you are more SK then townie, if the Mafia was indeed 4 strong then I anticipate the words "terribly unbalanced" being being flung at DoomYoshi like poo of 9 enraged chimps who's team just lost an unbalanced game of Mafia.
If, on the other hand, the Mafia was 3 players strong, then there are currently 7 townies, 2 unknown mobsters and one, both known and predominantly serial, killer. I say we start with him and then after a restful and for the Mafia, hopefully, futile night, we rise again, bright-eyed and bushy-tailed, to lynch the remaining mobsters.

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Don't forget BuJaber came up with probabilities first, random lynch chances etc. and he got lynched for that. William making the same/similar mistake in the same game screams WTF to me, so he is either inexperienced town or another experienced suicidal pokemon with a different alignment. And having him played a dozen of games, I'll go with the latter. That said, I'll follow the wagon andstrike wolf wrote:He didn't leave much of an impression with me the first two days but he has gone with a probability argument on Dakky. The problem with probability (and fos to mandy too ) other than the actual game of mafia skewing it is that it is an easy stance for scum to fall back on. It involves little chance with having to make fake reads and the logic is on the surface where it cant be as easily pried apart to reveal scum motivation.
This guy pretty much claimed to be sk before the game is done, and he killed a townie the night before. He refused to vote rish until he hammered at the very end. I made a quick calculation on what the odds are of dakky really being a town. If we lynch dakky, not only do we get rid of an sk, we get to find out if madmitch's results are accurate. At best dakky is mafia.dakky21 wrote:Since there are 2nd winning conditions, full claiming for example a fire or water or fighting pokemon will just give someone a reason to vote me. I can just add that I couldn't use my shot N1, my power started N2. Also, I have 50% chance with each shot to be turned into a SK. I'm still town, though. If I don't pick a target, someone will be randomly chosen.HotShot53 wrote:I assume that is your soft claim, that you are the vig dakky? You might as well full claim, because you're going to have to sooner or later.
If I have any flaws in my arguments, please point them out. Don't just say because using math doesn't give out tells, all of a sudden im mafia.strike wolf wrote:I wouldn't say the double condition to my 2nd win condition is unique. I mean there's dakky's one that changes with him. Originally I would have needed to get the thread to 40.
As far as today, as others have said, Dakky isn't a bad fall back Lynch but I DC onto think I want to go for him immediately without looking at others first. So my vote goes to:
vote William
He didn't leave much of an impression with me the first two days but he has gone with a probability argument on Dakky. The problem with probability (and fos to mandy too ) other than the actual game of mafia skewing it is that it is an easy stance for scum to fall back on. It involves little chance with having to make fake reads and the logic is on the surface where it cant be as easily pried apart to reveal scum motivation.
Bandwagon much?madmitch wrote:Letting Strike out of noose,his post sounds reasonable. can always check him out at night if needed. UNVOTE VOTE WILLIAM

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
Yeah, this is why lynching dakky is beneficial. Not only is his role simply negative towards town, but we can than assess madmitch depending on how dakky flips, whether we can believe his investigations, or if he is scum. Right now he's claiming to be a flavour cop and the first person he investigated is dead. Town most certainly has a real cop or they are at a disadvantage even against 3 mafia.mandalorian2298 wrote:Bandwagon much?madmitch wrote:Letting Strike out of noose,his post sounds reasonable. can always check him out at night if needed. UNVOTE VOTE WILLIAM
While I disagree with Strike's logic, at least he gives a reason for his vote. Dakky is, quite understandably, happy to help create a lynching controversy and ease the presure on himself. Mitch just LEAPS on the bandwagon, like he has been lurking all this time, waiting for a chance to vote for someone who isn't dakky. FOS Mitch
How is 3v2v1 not lylo? Going a step further, tomorrow we either lynch you and mafia wins (2v2), we lynch town and lose (2v2v1), or we lynch mafia (3v1v1) at which point, if you kill mafia and mafia kills town, (or mafia kills you and you kill town) it is, indeed, 2v1 still. If you kill mafia and mafia kills you, then town wins. If you and mafia both kill town, then it's 1v1v1 and town cannot win.dakky21 wrote: Exactly, but do the math. If there were 4 mafia out of 14 players, that means it's currently 9 alive players, out of which 3 are scum. So currently it is probably 6v3. With me lynched and one NK, that will leave town at 4 vs 3. That means tomorrow is LYLO. If you lynch scum today, even with my bad or good kill, tomorrow you will at worst have 4v2 or 3v2v1 if I morph to SK. I don't think 3 scum are possible in this setup, while 5 could be, but it's probably 4. If it's 5 scum, then we're already at LYLO as lynching me and NK will bring town to 3 people vs 4 scum.
And D1?madmitch wrote:I am not after Dakky because he is town ,I thought I proved that, anyone who goes after us most be scum