Nerds Mafia 4 Deaths Nerds Win

[Neutrino]

I'm not too sure about the browng thing. 2 days straight of nothing is pretty scummy, but Sierra does make a good point that he could have declared anyone not of his scum faction to be town. But that would have screwed up his partial Paranoid claim... Hmmm...

I'll mull on this and do a little constructive re-reading tomorrow.

[Sierra_Leon]

More discussion on this please. The thread fell to page 2 on the forum.

[diddle]

But theres nothing to discuss.

[LSU Tiger Josh]

have about 7 hours left ofr this day slackers

[Minister Masket]

VOTE DIDDLE
There's always something to discuss! Like how you are trying to waste time!

[Sierra_Leon]

have about 7 hours left ofr this day slackers

I hope you're joking.

Players Living
1. Firedud
4. GA7 replaced Cena-rules
5. Minister Masket
7. Sierra Leon
8. Crabnebula
10. Firth4eva
11. Skoffin
13. Dustn64
14. Neutrino
15. rebelman
17. TWO
18. Diddle
19. Lala
20. BrownG-08

Players in bold haven't posted this day. That's 8 out of 14 people. How are we supposed to reach a majority of votes, when more than half of the players haven't even posted yet? Getting 8 votes on anyone is pretty hard with only 6 people.


Vote: Modkill the following players:
1. Firedud
11. Skoffin
15. rebelman

Vote: Prod the following players:
4. GA7
8. Crabnebula
13. Dustn64
17. TWO
19. Lala

Vote: Reset deadline.

[fireedud]

Don't mod kill me!!!!!!!! RAwr!


FOS SL for attempting to mod kill me.



Anyway on a more serious note, I'd rather no have a no lynch, and browng is looking pretty scummy, so Vote Browng

[LSU Tiger Josh]

Several modkills will be coming and cena was supposed to reclaim his role. As awful as this is going I'm going to be reorganizing the powers of some of the roles and probably send that out tomorrow night.

[rebelman]

sorry rl stuff has got in my way over the last while so if i could avoid a mod kill i would appreciate it but if i cant so be it - although i am back active again.

[firth4eva]

Is it no lynch?
vote reset deadline
Come on everyone. I did it aliens mafia and in Barroom mafia and I really can't be bothered trying to keep the game active here, but I will if i have to.

[diddle]

VOTE DIDDLE
There's always something to discuss! Like how you are trying to waste time!

Find me something worth debating, and I'll unvote you. Your reasons for voting me are pointless, this isn't day 1 any more....

Vote MM

[Minister Masket]

VOTE DIDDLE
There's always something to discuss! Like how you are trying to waste time!

Find me something worth debating, and I'll unvote you. Your reasons for voting me are pointless, this isn't day 1 any more....

Vote MM

Well done. Actually I'm trying to generate discussion here. Unvote
It got you talking, yes?
Any point in re-reading? Or is it just garbage?

[lalaland]

I guess i've kinda been submarining... but there aren't new developements and I have nothing of importance to say.

[diddle]

VOTE DIDDLE
There's always something to discuss! Like how you are trying to waste time!

Find me something worth debating, and I'll unvote you. Your reasons for voting me are pointless, this isn't day 1 any more....

Vote MM

Well done. Actually I'm trying to generate discussion here. Unvote
It got you talking, yes?
Any point in re-reading? Or is it just garbage?

Well, I'll admit it got me talking. Yeah, 1 whole post. Wasn't that worth it. My vote stands.

[Minister Masket]

Nope, I guess not. Hmmmm....

[Neutrino]

Ok, I did some quick re-reading and didn't find anything exceptionally scummy. I did, however, remember that I was putting some pressure on diddle a few pages back, which apparently never warranted a response.

As for tommorrow's lynch, I've done a little re-reading. Diddle is starting to form the centre of a vague cloud of scummyness. Yesterday night he was arguing against Kiwi being sane (possibly because he realised that this would prove Sierra innocent) and today he isn't exactly being helpful in finding scum. Asking pointless questions and expecting others to do the actual work. Now, I admit this is by no means concrete evidence, but I thought it was interesting enough to warrant further development. I don't know what to make of his "(and I have my reasons to believe him)" (in reference to Jnd). Maybe a pre-emptive excuse, maybe he does actually know something. Can't hurt to flesh it out a little. Care to share?

Most people would have responded to that as soon as they saw it. But not diddle, apparently. Maybe I somehow exposed his scummyness for everyone to see, or maybe he simply missed it.. Let's get a response out of him...

[Sierra_Leon]

If diddle finds it worth discussing, I'd like to hear more from him too. I found this post somewhat suspicious:

So, are we gonna follow up the SL, Kiwi, Browng triangle today?

This is assuming browng is innocent of course. For the moment, I remain convinced that he is and that the quoted post was diddle's attempt to steer the discussion back to the fruitless bickering from the day before.

[Skoffin]

... I thought it was night << I was thrown by the 'night three' bit.

I too would like to hear from diddle, I will do some rereading in the meantime.

[LSU Tiger Josh]

This day will continue as I'm extending it due to the knuckleheads that aren't posting while I figure out what to do on here.

[diddle]

Everybody wants a bit of diddle!

Well, I can't actually remember Nuets post, so I'm gonna go and find it. Excuses are gonna be on their way in a minute.

[diddle]

As for tommorrow's lynch, I've done a little re-reading. Diddle is starting to form the centre of a vague cloud of scummyness. Yesterday night he was arguing against Kiwi being sane (possibly because he realised that this would prove Sierra innocent) and today he isn't exactly being helpful in finding scum. Asking pointless questions and expecting others to do the actual work. Now, I admit this is by no means concrete evidence, but I thought it was interesting enough to warrant further development. I don't know what to make of his "(and I have my reasons to believe him)" (in reference to Jnd). Maybe a pre-emptive excuse, maybe he does actually know something. Can't hurt to flesh it out a little. Care to share?

Theres nothing scummy about that. We had no reason to believe he was, so I was putting a little pressure on him. If he had been adamant of his sanity, then I would of become suspicious of his claim of cop.

This is interesting, the way that its written, it implies that me and SL are scum buddies, and I was trying to make everyone think he was innnocent. But you said this, in the very same post......

All these co-incidences are getting a little fantastic. First he was involved in the Sierra/Kiwi thing, now he manages to investigate a dead man? Not likely. Couple this with the fact Sierra is proved innocent and the way he kept bring up the possibility of his own paranoid-ness (a way to possibly deflect any backlash from a bad lynch) and I think we have a very good candidate for today's lynch.

So according to you, I'm trying to prove my suggested scum buddy who has already been proved innnocent, to be innocent. O......k......

Pointless questions, like these?

But theres nothing to discuss.

Find me something worth debating, and I'll unvote you. Your reasons for voting me are pointless, this isn't day 1 any more....

Vote MM

Well, I'll admit it got me talking. Yeah, 1 whole post. Wasn't that worth it. My vote stands.

Well, there ya go, a little argument with MM has been my days exploits. But in all of my posts, I see no questions. That argument is dead Neut, drop it.


As for not responding, theres not much I can say. Although Neut, you should of brought up this a couple of pages back, since the post of yours that I didn't respond to, was 10 pages ago. Not exactly breaking news....

If diddle finds it worth discussing, I'd like to hear more from him too. I found this post somewhat suspicious:

So, are we gonna follow up the SL, Kiwi, Browng triangle today?

This is assuming browng is innocent of course. For the moment, I remain convinced that he is and that the quoted post was diddle's attempt to steer the discussion back to the fruitless bickering from the day before.

This made me laugh. Well of course you'd find it suspicious, I saying we should follow up something concerning you. I just thought we could maybe try and decide what actually happened, then maybe we would establish who was lying. You may have seen it as fruitless bickering, I saw it as a rare chance of activity. Its day 4 and we're on 30 pages. In the grand scheme of things, thats pitiful. I'd rather have fruitless bickering then complete silence.

And finally....

... I thought it was night << I was thrown by the 'night three' bit.

I too would like to hear from diddle, I will do some rereading in the meantime.

I can give you some pretty good odds she won't post again in a while.

[firth4eva]

I'm still unsure on browng. We know Sierra is innocent. I think diddle may be a good lynch as that above post didn't entirely convince me.

[rebelman]

Players Living
1. Firedud
4. GA7 replaced Cena-rules
5. Minister Masket
7. Sierra Leon
8. Crabnebula
10. Firth4eva
11. Skoffin
13. Dustn64
14. Neutrino
15. rebelman
17. TWO
18. Diddle
19. Lala
20. BrownG-08



Town Dead Zone
21. Danix Campus police Sergeant(Naive cop Day 1 lynch
12. NES (Bomb) Mod killed
6. Nagerous Toshiro Takashi (Day cop) Night 1 kill
9. Kiwi Lamar Latrell (Cop) Day 2 lynch
16 Fircoal Arnold Poindexter (Roleblcker)Night 2 kill
22. Jnd Nerd's Robot (Tracker) Night 2 kill
3. Kwanton (Lewis Skonick Jack of all Trades) Killed Night 3


Killed Scum
2. Lord Voldemort (Kevin O'Leary Userper) Killed Night 3

people the numbers in this gane are starting to seriously alarm me - only one scum dead so far v 7 townies - its time we started working together to redress this, I realise the submarining by me and others hasn't helped

[rebelman]

Hey, I'm cop, and I've investigated Sierra Leon. He came up scum. Given the fact that there may be a paranoid cop, we can't be entirely sure if this is right, but we should look into it.
FOS Sierra Leon.

I'm reading back over this thread at the moment (im up to page 10) so if this is already dealt with im sorry

for now (while i read on) unvote vote sierra leon

[rebelman]

We can't be sure of browng-08 sanity, but I'm a big fan of lynching to find out. It's not me you have to lynch to find out though. I have no choice but to roleclaim here. I'm Betty Childs, Busdriver.

Here's what I sent LSU last night:

Switch Sierra_Leon and KiwiTaker

Because I feel like the mafia might try to take me out night one and Kiwi is my prime suspect.

I was very much in doubt as to whether I should switch nag and kiwi or myself and kiwi. My urge for self-preservation got the better of me. I hit myself on the head when I saw nag died, and now with browng's results I'm really sinking in embarrasment.

Anyhow, I think there are two possible ways to go here:
1) Lynch kiwi. If he's town, browng is paranoid of insane. Or scum, but I doubt that.
2) Lynch me. You find out I'm really the busdriver, and you lynch kiwi next. (or even better, if there's a vig he can take him out)

My vote is already on kiwi, so I'm leaving it there.

further to my above post kiwi turned out to be town so unvote for now while i read further