Are You a Werewolf? [a Mafia game] ~TOWN VICTORY!~

Hitman079 · Post by **Hitman079** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 9:44 pm

wicked wrote:Hey Noobs!

hitman's mafia rules wrote:There will be a Day phase and Night phase. All discussion takes place during the Day phase. ABSOLUTELY NO POSTING AT NIGHT, except by me if required.

i can't lock threads :'(
and by the way, as you guys requested for minkish to tell the last word in ihs role PM, it is "werewolves".. so he woulda been lynched. anyways, minkish, shut up. you're dead.

pyro55 · Post by **pyro55** » Thu Mar 15, 2007 7:35 am

we can talk if we are dead we just cant give away vital info

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Thu Mar 15, 2007 7:37 am

pyro55 wrote:we can talk if we are dead we just cant give away vital info

Hitman said NO TALKING AT NIGHT...

Don't disrespect or contradict the mod of the game, jackass.

Now HUSH!

Hitman079 · Post by **Hitman079** » Thu Mar 15, 2007 10:48 pm

Once again, the horrid night passes and it is day again. With the guardian angel dead, the villagers have not much hope of being saved from the wrath of the werewolves. The sun peeks over the horizon, and the village assembles at the gallows. The Mayor once again does a role call, and inevitably one is missing. S.xkitten is missing. So some of the town officers go to her house and search it. There they find her in the bedroom a mangled mess. There's not much to make of her body, so her home is searched. Nothing significant is found, except some wolfsbane near her nightstand. The townspeople come to a conclusion that she was a regular townie. Meanwhile, back at the town square accusations are now open.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I added a new rule, so check it out on page 1. Not that you guys will follow them anyway.

s.xkitten · Post by **s.xkitten** » Thu Mar 15, 2007 10:51 pm

yummy...well...gl y'all

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 2:32 am

NOOOOOOOOOOOO! We lost as townie.

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:39 am

Fircoal wrote:NOOOOOOOOOOOO! We lost as townie.

That sounded a bit overdramatic, Fir... I still think you are guilty!

Aimless · Post by **Aimless** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 1:35 pm

Well, damn. Rough start.

Well, in the interests of try to find where we went wrong, here's the order of votes against Minkish :

1. Fircoal
2. vgmaster
3. Aimless
4. everywhere116
5. s.xkitten
6. WMW
7. Anarkistsdream

I think it's pretty clear that Fircoal is a villager, as he claims. He answered my question correctly, which he shouldn't have been able to do were he a wolf.

vgmaster I'm not sure about. He made the suggestion to test Minkish, and was pretty adamant about us voting for one of the two. If he were a wolf, and thus knew both were villagers, then voting either off could only help him. Plus, suggesting that test would prevent it from being used against him later.

For myself, I don't have any defense for my vote that I haven't already given.

everywhere116 was the first to confirm Fircoal's answer. He could have been keying off of the fact that Fircoal gave an answer at all (which, presumably, a wolf wouldn't do), but that's risky. Thus, although I'm not as confident about his innocence as I am Fircoal's, I think the evidence is in his favor.

s.xkitten was a townie.

WMW attempted to stop the bandwagon (albeit too late). I think that pretty well exonerates him.

Anarkistsdream has been extremely cautious in voting, but also put the final nail in Minkish's coffin. That said, for now, I'm inclined to trust him.

I thought before, and I still think, that our wolves are submarining. This is partly why I was suspicious of Minkish. So, my gut instinct is that, with the possible exception of vgmaster, I don't think anyone who voted is a wolf.

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 1:37 pm

Aimless wrote:Well, damn. Rough start.

Well, in the interests of try to find where we went wrong, here's the order of votes against Minkish :

1. Fircoal
2. vgmaster
3. Aimless
4. everywhere116
5. s.xkitten
6. WMW
7. Anarkistsdream

I think it's pretty clear that Fircoal is a villager, as he claims. He answered my question correctly, which he shouldn't have been able to do were he a wolf.

vgmaster I'm not sure about. He made the suggestion to test Minkish, and was pretty adamant about us voting for one of the two. If he were a wolf, and thus knew both were villagers, then voting either off could only help him. Plus, suggesting that test would prevent it from being used against him later.

For myself, I don't have any defense for my vote that I haven't already given.

everywhere116 was the first to confirm Fircoal's answer. He could have been keying off of the fact that Fircoal gave an answer at all (which, presumably, a wolf wouldn't do), but that's risky. Thus, although I'm not as confident about his innocence as I am Fircoal's, I think the evidence is in his favor.

s.xkitten was a townie.

WMW attempted to stop the bandwagon (albeit too late). I think that pretty well exonerates him.

Anarkistsdream has been extremely cautious in voting, but also put the final nail in Minkish's coffin. That said, for now, I'm inclined to trust him.

I thought before, and I still think, that our wolves are submarining. This is partly why I was suspicious of Minkish. So, my gut instinct is that, with the possible exception of vgmaster, I don't think anyone who voted is a wolf.

Alright, that actually makes quite a bit of sense. I hadn't thought about Fircoal and Everywhere in that regards, but it IS logical.

So, who does that leave that didn't post?

Machiavelli and who else?

Balsiefen · Post by **Balsiefen** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 1:52 pm

me but i had voted fircoal

i am still not convinced by him though

Aimless · Post by **Aimless** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 1:54 pm

cmckinney, Machiavelli, pyro55, and Puff didn't post at all while the bandwagon against Minkish was happening. Balseifen and Syzygy popped up on page 13, and that was the last.

Aimless · Post by **Aimless** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 1:55 pm

Er, except for that post right above me.

We to squeak in under the buzzer, Balseifen.

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 1:59 pm

Considering that I have seen Puff and Pyro55 BOTH in other threads fairly often, I feel suspicious about their motives...

cmckinney NEVER posts, in ANY mafia game, so I have to say that is just him, regardless of if he is mafia or not. I don't necessarily like it, but *shrug*

I don't know much about Machiavelli, so that does seem a little odd, but I don't know what to make of it...

However, Puff is usually quite the participant...

FOS: Puff

vgmmaster · Post by **vgmmaster** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 3:58 pm

So the thing against Minkish failed. Well, that sucks, plain and simple.

Two things though. First of all, Mach seems to be a little quiet compared to some of his other games.

TFOS: Mach

Something seems odd about Kitten's death though. Maybe I'm mistaken here, but I don't think she's really well liked. Possibly somebody wanted to kill her out of spite? Just a possibility.

pyro55 · Post by **pyro55** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:12 pm

vgm wrote:So the thing against Minkish failed. Well, that sucks, plain and simple.

Two things though. First of all, Mach seems to be a little quiet compared to some of his other games.

TFOS: Mach

Something seems odd about Kitten's death though. Maybe I'm mistaken here, but I don't think she's really well liked. Possibly somebody wanted to kill her out of spite? Just a possibility.

i agree but if you guys look back everywhere seemed to be hounding mink alot although that i know of everywhere didnt seem to have anyting against kitten

thus i must go with FOS:mach & everywhere

plus i must agree with anarkist fircoal did seem a little dramatic over the loss of kitt
so FOS:fircoal

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:39 pm

Why can't I post a long No post. It's because of other reasons involving mafia, not something I'd like to say. I'd say the inactive players are looking the scummiest.

vgmmaster · Post by **vgmmaster** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:42 pm

Fircoal wrote:Why can't I post a long No post. It's because of other reasons involving mafia, not something I'd like to say. I'd say the inactive players are looking the scummiest.

Or in other words, you're saying they're playing a textbook game of mafia by trying to hide. That theory makes sense, as there are a fair share of newer players here.

It also strikes me as odd concerning Mach's relative inactivity. It just doesn't seem like him as I mentioned earlier.

vgmmaster · Post by **vgmmaster** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 6:02 pm

I checked, and Mach's only posts were on pages 8-10.

I'm trying to read them for clues, and I think I have a suspicion against two different players. I won't mention it yet, but it makes sense (at least to me), and if autoload's theory is correct (taken from another game, not posted so the mafia won't recieve any hints), then this player is mafia.

VOTE: Mach

He's usually very active in my experience in playing with him, and his new playing style (not posting) just doesn't seem like him. I believe he is a werewolf/mafia and is trying to avoid suspicion. Also, if you read pages 8-10 carefully, you may see what I'm hinting on, if mach is indeed mafia as I'm believing.

Also, as we already accidentally killed the cop/doc, we may as well trust what he said previously.

Hitman079 · Post by **Hitman079** » Fri Mar 16, 2007 8:29 pm

Town Vote Count
[1] Machiavelli
With 12 players remaining, it takes 7 votes to reach a majority.

Syzygy · Post by **Syzygy** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 11:06 am

TFOS: Everywhere116

Why?

His discussion regarding why the guardian angel didn't role claim seems to be geared to getting future non-vanilla townies to reveal themselves if they are about to be lynched. This would help the mafia quite a bit.

pyro55 · Post by **pyro55** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 12:43 pm

i could just be bandwagoning but im gunna vote mach

everywhere116 · Post by **everywhere116** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 1:56 pm

Syzygy wrote:TFOS: Everywhere116

Why?

His discussion regarding why the guardian angel didn't role claim seems to be geared to getting future non-vanilla townies to reveal themselves if they are about to be lynched. This would help the mafia quite a bit.

This isnt true. He wouldnt defend himself, and the way he just said " look for it" really sounds like he was lying. All I wanted was for him to prove he was innocent, which he wouldn't do.

everywhere116 · Post by **everywhere116** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 2:06 pm

Now that I think about is, syzygy, you seem to be as big of a submarine as mach. You started to post at about page 6(?) and then average about one post a page. Until page 13, where you post that it takes 7 to lynch. Fast forward to now, page 22, and this is your first post sincer page 13. I think you are trying to fly under the radar with mach, so that you can stay out of discussion to try not to be caufght.

FOS Syzygy

everywhere116 · Post by **everywhere116** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 2:07 pm

everywhere116 wrote: so that you can stay out of discussion to try not to be caufght.

This should be "caught"

Puff · Post by **Puff** » Sat Mar 17, 2007 2:41 pm

vgmmaster wrote:I checked, and Mach's only posts were on pages 8-10.

I'm trying to read them for clues, and I think I have a suspicion against two different players. I won't mention it yet, but it makes sense (at least to me), and if autoload's theory is correct (taken from another game, not posted so the mafia won't recieve any hints), then this player is mafia.

VOTE: Mach

He's usually very active in my experience in playing with him, and his new playing style (not posting) just doesn't seem like him. I believe he is a werewolf/mafia and is trying to avoid suspicion. Also, if you read pages 8-10 carefully, you may see what I'm hinting on, if mach is indeed mafia as I'm believing.

Also, as we already accidentally killed the cop/doc, we may as well trust what he said previously.

what mach said id look a bit suspicious

vote mach