Moderator: Community Team
He's not the only one - after rereading the thread, I don't have dakky down as having said anything meaningful, either.degaston wrote:Unvote
Vote Iron Butterfly
... because he's only made one post since the game started.
sempaispellcheck wrote:Ah, yes. Thank you, gt - I had forgotten who it was Storr was on about.
Now that I think about it, you've got some good points. Pressuring mtam could also help us get more of a feel for how helpful or harmful Storr will be.
UNVOTE STORR
VOTE MTAMBURINI
sempai

StorrZerg wrote: i find no joy in this
You voted him before he claimed to have kpsempaispellcheck wrote:So much for your being helpful.
I was wary of mtam from the moment I saw him post that he had a nightkill.
I should have said as much when I voted for him.
Why didn't I? I don't really remember right now. Storr's antics may have been distracting me - and still are.![]()
sempai

Storr and Mtam are friends in real life... they often have a fight early in a game, and then get along the rest of the game. Storr has stated in a previous game that they will almost never try to actually lynch or night kill each other, so if mtam is a vig I doubt he will actually take out storr... in re-reading what mtam said he'd "use his power" on storr, not necessarily kill him... so it's possible he has some other power than vig he can use to check storr. (Or he's scum and already knows if storr is scum or not, so can just say tomorrow he checked him and storr's clean, whether or not he actually is. How much you can believe whatever he says about storr on day 2 depends how much you think mtam is town/scum. I'm still neutral on him at this point, as I am on most people, not enough to go on yet)sempaispellcheck wrote:I'm still waiting for an answer on the backstory behind the hate-boners that storr and mtam (mostly mtam) seem to have for each other.
That would explain why I didn't say as much, then.StorrZerg wrote:You voted him before he claimed to have kpsempaispellcheck wrote:So much for your being helpful.
I was wary of mtam from the moment I saw him post that he had a nightkill.
I should have said as much when I voted for him.
Why didn't I? I don't really remember right now. Storr's antics may have been distracting me - and still are.![]()
sempai
got tonkaed wrote:Do we at this point have a reason to believe Mtam would be a vig and not an anti-town character with a night kill? I just haven't seen anyone say it, and since it got casually thrown out that he had the power to begin with, not sure why anyone is assuming it is aligned one way or the other.
Yes you can - because maybe you are waiting for reactions first before you give a reason. Anyway my reasoning was that I thought Rage could easily hide behind his ignorance of the Harry Potter universe and as he's stated it a few times it struck me a basis for suspicion. At this stage it's not much...dd515087 wrote:Also not useful. I could get behind one too, but you have to give reasons you can't just say "I would vote for this person if other people do" that's just scummy as hell.pershy wrote:I could get behind a Ragian vote....


Honestly I could not give a f*ck. If you mean die in real life I am slightly concerned but I reckon I will sleep ok. If you mean in the game then f*ck it.mtamburini wrote:
Thats the only part I Read which made me want to vote for you so how do you feel knowing that is my reasoning for you to die?

Also says in the next post lynched today or die tonight.mtamburini wrote:UNVOTE VOTE RAIGAN or whatever the f*ck his name is, Ill just use my ability on storr tonight since I wont be able to get him lynched anywaysmtamburini wrote:Oh and most importantly VOTE STORR
This is pretty much exactly what I am thinking.BGtheBrain wrote:I keep hearing people say Storr may have a trick up his sleeve or he may be useful later on.StorrZerg wrote:I've claimed 3rd party survivor, yet that's not obvious I guess. I'm under no post Restriction other than having fun and being sad I'm not with anyone.
He's either a 3rd party survivor who has done nothing but draw attention to himself, claimed without pressure and made D1 suck worse than normal OR hes lying about the full extent of his role.
So, yeah. Ill lynch based on poor play or Ill lynch on Lynch all Liars...

I know there are others, but you have to start somewhere... If IB starts participating, then maybe I'll move on to someone else. I annoyed the hell out of him with questions in my first game, so maybe he doesn't want to talk to me.sempaispellcheck wrote:He's not the only one - after rereading the thread, I don't have dakky down as having said anything meaningful, either.degaston wrote:Unvote
Vote Iron Butterfly
... because he's only made one post since the game started.
MudPuppy and Pixar have each made one possibly somewhat meaningful post which didn't really tell us anything we didn't already know.
He is claiming his only job is to make it to the end of the game alive. He doesn't win if the mafia win, he doesn't win if the town win, he only wins if he lives. It is a pretty weird claim to make day 1, but its a lot harder to make it when you are about to be lynched on day 3 or 4 or whatever.degaston wrote:Oh, and could someone explain what a 3rd party survivor is? I'm not finding anything useful with google.
Just has to survive till endgame. He can win with town or mafia.degaston wrote:Oh, and could someone explain what a 3rd party survivor is? I'm not finding anything useful with google.

Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
got tonkaed wrote:Dakky - want to let us all know why you think the mafia should be able to talk via pm during the daylight?
I thought I had seen a message that he was on vacation, but maybe I was thinking of aage. I'd prefer to lynch a non-contributor over someone I don't have much of a read on.charm wrote:VOTE skillfusniper
He has not made a single post and if he is not going to play then we might as well get rid of him now.