Moderator: Community Team
Pushing a lynch and claim aren't the same of course.Streaker wrote:What is scummy about pushing Mitch to a claim?
Also, just for clarification, Storr, do you know what people get for visiting you?
2 things. It seems to me everyone can visit someone during the day but your post implies that you cannot. True/false?got tonkaed wrote:Nothing about mitch screams best choice to me. Essentially he had a day action where he visited storr day 1. It seems reasonable to believe he wouldn't know what would happen, which seems to be corroborated by Hotshot.
Storr seems to have filled in some of the gaps, but my assumption is none of that has really been alignment tied on its own merits.
People pushing a lynch on mitch are scummier for pushing an easy lynch.
I dont think he is mafia because of the mechanics of the role and not because of flavour. My understanding fails at third party characters, so I would agree that he could be third party. That said I think we both agree that there is one character who fits perfectly and who is definitely town.Marashu wrote:Ok, don't tell us. But you seem pretty convinced about things that could go a few ways. You say mitch is not Rand? If he didn't do much research, I can see 2 things in his posts that suggest he might be. You say you know that Storr's role is town? I can think of a case for a 3rd party who corrupts those who take his gifts, and might potentially win when half the vote is controlled. I could potentially see a case for a scum with the role (evil merchant), but I feel like that one is a bit of a stretch. Further, the town character only really gives one kind of item - I'm not sure where this multiple items thing is coming from. For the time being, I'm still leaning town with Storr, and I do think that it's the character I think you think he is.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Anyone actually think I should explain my understanding of flavour? I think not. Yes I have a very good idea who Storr and Madmitch are. This I have gained from research. No I dont think I should actually tell you.

Yes I know what items are given out after they tradeStreaker wrote:What is scummy about pushing Mitch to a claim?
Also, just for clarification, Storr, do you know what people get for visiting you?


And that makes you an easy mislynch for mafia, so stop being stubborn. Its not a defense.Endgame422 wrote:And streaker by now you ought to know im stubborn about these kind of things.
this strikes me as i have the ability to visit people aswell, just like i presume most others do, but i didnt know what would happen when i did, just as others i presume.Talapus wrote:madmitch wrote:I don,t know how many people have the ability to visit somebody but I know I did that was my only day ability and hopefully I can use it for town . Ido not understand endgame vote against me but it is quite unremarkable and slightly scummy FOS
Now I'm confused. You said visiting someone was your only day ability but in the prior post you didn't know what you were trading for. That makes it sound like you instigated the trade but until you found out what you were getting you weren't going to go through with it. So what is it Mitch, visit someone and trade, or just visit and the trade some how happened?
Because it sounds like you have more then the ability to just visit people. Also, was this a fair trade? Because you said you got something awesome. The reason I ask is because it is fairly easy to prove if someone traded something mutually with you. However, there is the possibility you visited someone and stole an ability and there was no trade. So again, please clarify.
Hilarious. Because it's day one and I haven't formed many opinions yet as to who is scum is a scum tell? I'm sorry I'm not jumping on the meta discussions of some players but I just haven't played with enough of you yet to come to a meta decision...not that I would anyway. I tried following your logic in your post with this quote but ya got lost. I'm still trying to figure out what's going on in this game so perhaps you could cut me some slack as I am totally out of the loop on the story it self.virus90 wrote:
this made me read some more posts of talapus, but so far he hasnt come with much opinions, which is a scum sign to me.
therefore: ill unvote (if its somewhere) vote talapus.
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!
Let's not even go down this road as this is a large assumption and can take us somewhere we really don't want to go. The mod said,Endgame422 wrote:
2 things. It seems to me everyone can visit someone during the day but your post implies that you cannot. True/false?
Technically storr could have sat on his ass and done nothing and still get visited by two players and god only knows what everyone else was capable of doing. But the mod said he wanted everyone active in both day/nitgh cycles which means in my mind there is a lot going on. That and the fact he posted in the main thread that two players didn't get their actions in tells me I think players have more options than just visiting other players. So there is no benefit to really ask what everyone did during the day at this point as it sounds like evryone of us did something with the exception of 2.rishaed wrote:Mod Note: Day Action Results are being sent out now. Those two who didn't send an action in are considered to not have used it since i gave notes on this with a deadline yesterday.
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!
I kind of disagree with this actually for the fact I think they would go with storr over mitch. But if a claim is what the majority want to go for I would say that mitch needs to keep what he got for the trade a secret as another player got an ability as well. If it turns out mitch is scum or town at least mafia won't know what kind of abilities storr is handing out. I'm not exactly sure storr should be selling himself as the candy man with the coolest stuff in town to hand out. But I'd bet town and mafia will target him so he may actually live to see tomorrow in which case I'm sure many will visit for what I am assuming are one shot abilities.got tonkaed wrote:Pushing a lynch and claim aren't the same of course.Streaker wrote:What is scummy about pushing Mitch to a claim?
Also, just for clarification, Storr, do you know what people get for visiting you?
Having said that since it is getting closer to deadline i am guessing, pushing mitch a claim is kind of still easy lynch pushing because lets face it, if mitch claims d1, it is just as likely people are going to oh ok, and lynch him anyway.
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:This is what I was waiting for.
Good spot Virus.
Unvote Vote Talapus. I really dont like players who react immediately to being voted. If your town you should already be contributing.
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!

You were going to lynch wing as well. What are your reads on others?mtamburini wrote:Read virus's 2 posts since ive been gone. Id still lynch him

