Moderator: Community Team

i doubt we get a claim since she requested to be removed from the gamenagerous wrote:I think we should wait for a claim... no-one hammer please.
Note: Please disregard my post here. I unvoted, pushing Flores back to L-2 and making the post I made a moot point. I am in favor of Nate's idea now that my concerns have been alleviated by my unvote.AceArtemis wrote:What's to stop some random idiot who didn't read the thread from hammering before Iliad has the chance to kill? Don't forget, Flores is at L-1, so someone could just come along and hammer, ending the day.Natewolfman wrote: I do still think we are better served giving illy a name right before we lynch flores,
lol, skimming?icedagger wrote:Day one ruined by a jester.. day two ruined by flores sulking.. sighh
Nate your idea makes no sense. We can't lynch someone and then do anything. Day ends as soon as the lynching vote has been cast


Drench wrote:String of four. Nice.
At this stage, I'm willing to Vote: Its Bolt. Incredibly scummy, contradictions (That MCC of yours won't reveal roles, but it will reveal the lyncher!), and that MCC just tip the barrel off the edge.
Complete contradiction, their may have been tohers but you were the first I noticed. unvote vote drenchDrench wrote:EBWOP: Vote: Flores.
Ok, that makes sense. Unvote. For future reference, the people who voted for Militant due to inactivity are: Nzen, Stroop, Ga7, ace1217, and me.pmchugh wrote:First off Fos anyone trying to lynch an inactive, we should get them replaced in case they are a power role. Only if they are actively lurking then it is scummy.
Pmc, if you are going to quote an EBWOP, you should also quote the post that the EBWOP was referring to, otherwise you are quoting out of context. Yes, it is scummy to change positions like that, but you should at least show why Drench voted for Flores, so that the town can more easily examine Drench's reasoning rather than assume Drench voted for Flores for no reason. Here is the post Drench's EBWOP was referring to:pmchugh wrote:Drench wrote:String of four. Nice.
At this stage, I'm willing to Vote: Its Bolt. Incredibly scummy, contradictions (That MCC of yours won't reveal roles, but it will reveal the lyncher!), and that MCC just tip the barrel off the edge.Complete contradiction, their may have been tohers but you were the first I noticed. unvote vote drenchDrench wrote:EBWOP: Vote: Flores.
Apparently, Drench voted for Flores because he thought Flores was "digging a hole for herself" after Flores responded to the bandwagon on Day 2. Though it could just be a reason to bandwagon an innocent, I'm not fully convinced Drench is scum. I do find the contradiction pmc pointed out somewhat scummy, however.Drench wrote:Back and reading.
However, I did read the last page quickly, and Flores is quickly digging a hole for herself. I mean:
What is that?as usual my conquer chauvinist take the easy way out bandwagoning the only woman at play who make no excuses for point out your lack of vision ^^
This. I didn't know you were female until you happened to say it. Migods, this is a Mafia game! You have been scummy, therefore people are voting you!You are being bandwagoned because people consider you to be scummy.
Am I missing something here? Or is this a funny? If it is, I dun gedit.Do not forget that I wield the difference between the life and death.
I meant in the context of the gameSnorri1234 wrote:Bards are music-makers. Elan is annoying.
There is an outside chance that militant is a power role. I think it unlikely. Players with power roles do limit their posts to forestall the attention of scum & lynches. Scum know they can't lurk without suspicion. Some players who receive a vanilla town role, in contrast, decide to deadbeat (in protest/disappointment). I suspect this is the case.AceArtemis wrote:Ok, that makes sense. Unvote. For future reference, the people who voted for Militant due to inactivity are: Nzen, Stroop, Ga7, ace1217, and me.pmchugh wrote:First off Fos anyone trying to lynch an inactive, we should get them replaced in case they are a power role. Only if they are actively lurking then it is scummy.
The last is three posts below Minister Masket's flashy obituary for Its Bolt. That's all he has written. My initial guess was that he can only respond to accusations but four people have voted for him since then. He hasn't been absent from CC:militant wrote:(Mon Feb 23 p) Confrimga7 wrote: (Tue Feb 24) Vote Masket err crap. Vote Milifor cheating on us(Thu Feb 26)icedagger wrote:(Thu Feb 25) Vote mili as I haven't done so in a while
And thats sufficent reason, is it?
(Fri Feb 27 militant quotes ga7 &Its Bolt had just claimed)
How did I cheat on you?
Regarding the last post: The warning doesn't really make me think Bolt is town
(Sun Mar 01) And your reasoning, good sir?Its Bolt wrote:(Sat Nov 29) I would say the best people to lynch over the next few days are FDM, / and mili. You should have at least two anti-town players in there.
well, considering we have less then a day to go...AceArtemis wrote:Militant probably needs a prod, then, if he's been active on CC but not in this game.
Hehe, sounds like what I'm doing more or less.pmchugh wrote:Yeah sometimes people play games and forget about or get bored of mafia. By actively lurking i mean he is reading through the thread is kept up to date on it but doesn't post to avoid suspicion.
DoomYoshi wrote:Test it on me. Tree stump is my favorite role anyway lol. Next time I am picking Wispy Woods as my character.
