Missing action = ga7 or FloresDoomYoshi wrote:Who on the list of players is most likely to miss an action?new guy1 wrote:Or maybe he missed his action.
Who is most likely to have been roleblocked?
Roleblocked = Iron, nag, Strike
Moderator: Community Team
Missing action = ga7 or FloresDoomYoshi wrote:Who on the list of players is most likely to miss an action?new guy1 wrote:Or maybe he missed his action.
Who is most likely to have been roleblocked?
Good point. Take Iron off the list.DoomYoshi wrote:Why would a roleblocker block iron after I cleared him?
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
I suppose neb answered that, but to be honest I didnt have a list prepared. Was throwing the thoughts I could at the time out.DoomYoshi wrote:Who on the list of players is most likely to miss an action?new guy1 wrote:Or maybe he missed his action.
Who is most likely to have been roleblocked?
Doom asked a question, I answered. My criteria was looking at vets as block targets. Newbs will slip up if they are Jack. Vets will play it better. That's all.strike wolf wrote:Why would I have been blocked?
Well I agree with your reasoning. It may not be helpful to play WIFOM-WIFOM guessy pants... but it's all we have for now. So go through the names and think. The problem I am having is the whole factional thing. We can't rule out a third-party Jack. Which means there may still be a "typical" mafia. Which means it may have been a mafia roleblocker blocking Jack and some other mechanism for town. To simplify the possibilities in my head, I am discounting that opinion. The simplest solution is that Jack targeted whoever saf tried to save, not because he tried to save him, but because an SK will try to go for a less obvious kill to avoid crosskills. In this assumptory universe a town roleblocker blocked a mafia kill. Since there have been no outings and I am the only one voting today (unvote, btw) I am thinking town roleblock is unlikely. Forgotten action may be the next course of action.new guy1 wrote:I suppose neb answered that, but to be honest I didnt have a list prepared. Was throwing the thoughts I could at the time out.DoomYoshi wrote:Who on the list of players is most likely to miss an action?new guy1 wrote:Or maybe he missed his action.
Who is most likely to have been roleblocked?
Well the roleblock part can be answered now. Neb's logic makes sense, vets would be pretty viable and slightly more likely targets I suppose. I would guess that Jack would be alone, but for there to be no NK's last night, I double we got that lucky. I see it as theres Jack who probably can kill each night, but also might attack on alternate nights, and then after tonight we will see if there is more than 1 kill to speculate on a mafia faction. In a setup like this, we either have alot of sanity issued cops (which if there are any other cops in the game, they have probably already gotten that vibe) or there will be a mafia faction with sure fire cops, maybe a screwy one, and then the rest of town. I say this because a 15 player game with only 1 scum would be way too lopsided IMO unless he has godlike powers.DoomYoshi wrote:Well I agree with your reasoning. It may not be helpful to play WIFOM-WIFOM guessy pants... but it's all we have for now. So go through the names and think. The problem I am having is the whole factional thing. We can't rule out a third-party Jack. Which means there may still be a "typical" mafia. Which means it may have been a mafia roleblocker blocking Jack and some other mechanism for town. To simplify the possibilities in my head, I am discounting that opinion. The simplest solution is that Jack targeted whoever saf tried to save, not because he tried to save him, but because an SK will try to go for a less obvious kill to avoid crosskills. In this assumptory universe a town roleblocker blocked a mafia kill. Since there have been no outings and I am the only one voting today (unvote, btw) I am thinking town roleblock is unlikely. Forgotten action may be the next course of action.new guy1 wrote:I suppose neb answered that, but to be honest I didnt have a list prepared. Was throwing the thoughts I could at the time out.DoomYoshi wrote:Who on the list of players is most likely to miss an action?new guy1 wrote:Or maybe he missed his action.
Who is most likely to have been roleblocked?
However, @ the hypothetical town roleblocker of dubious existence: you can play NK nights like a cop and subtley vote for whoever you blocked. However, in this vote thrifty town, such a move would probably have ousted you, so I don't blame you for laying low.
virus: what happened to your strike case?
vote nag
for being lazy and trying to trade a town PR for a minimal chance clue.

Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
They have been prodded... Looks like they need to be replaced. I will work on that later today.strike wolf wrote:I'm not sure how to proceed to be honest, Safari was my one strong read in this game and we've seen how this has turned out. I don't know if I trust Hotshot or not as he's given me some town vibes and some scum vibes, the rest either have come forward with a believable claim (did we ever test Benga's double vote? I don't think we did.) or I haven't seen anything from them that says much. Ga7 and Flores need to be at least prodded if not out right replaced.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Benga said his double vote won't work on day 1 or 2, if I remember correctly. So it can't be tested yet unfortunately. Not like anyone knows who to vote on anyway lol.strike wolf wrote:I'm not sure how to proceed to be honest, Safari was my one strong read in this game and we've seen how this has turned out. I don't know if I trust Hotshot or not as he's given me some town vibes and some scum vibes, the rest either have come forward with a believable claim (did we ever test Benga's double vote? I don't think we did.) or I haven't seen anything from them that says much. Ga7 and Flores need to be at least prodded if not out right replaced.
Dr. Watson would most certainly be a real Doc. I can not imagine him as anything else. Could I be wrong? Most certainly. I do not believe I have ever played in a game with two docs though I have been in games with back up docs.HotShot53 wrote:Is it possible there is another real doc out there than saved the obvious target of DY? And Safari really is an insanity or delusional doc?
When there is no-one to look at, I usually go after whomever has been inactive/scummarizing the most... but I guess everyone was here since no-one had something to go on lol

virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Agreed. The BBC series makes his skills as a doctor more prominent than the stories do, IIRC, but nevertheless he is a real doctor and it makes total sense, assuming that Watson/Holmes are 'town'.Iron Butterfly wrote:Dr. Watson would most certainly be a real Doc. I can not imagine him as anything else.HotShot53 wrote:Is it possible there is another real doc out there than saved the obvious target of DY? And Safari really is an insanity or delusional doc?
When there is no-one to look at, I usually go after whomever has been inactive/scummarizing the most... but I guess everyone was here since no-one had something to go on lol
Hey, Mr. Sneaky McSneakers, sneaking back into this game! Okay, so you replace ga7.Metsfanmax wrote:Agreed. The BBC series makes his skills as a doctor more prominent than the stories do, IIRC, but nevertheless he is a real doctor and it makes total sense, assuming that Watson/Holmes are 'town'.Iron Butterfly wrote:Dr. Watson would most certainly be a real Doc. I can not imagine him as anything else.HotShot53 wrote:Is it possible there is another real doc out there than saved the obvious target of DY? And Safari really is an insanity or delusional doc?
When there is no-one to look at, I usually go after whomever has been inactive/scummarizing the most... but I guess everyone was here since no-one had something to go on lol
The rest of us have something to go on -- the fact that you showed up in the note. Would it be the worst thing to lynch Neb, just so we can find out whether we can 'trust' the notes from Jack (if they are in fact from Jack?)Nebuchadnezer wrote:Hey, Mr. Sneaky McSneakers, sneaking back into this game! Okay, so you replace ga7.Metsfanmax wrote:Agreed. The BBC series makes his skills as a doctor more prominent than the stories do, IIRC, but nevertheless he is a real doctor and it makes total sense, assuming that Watson/Holmes are 'town'.Iron Butterfly wrote:Dr. Watson would most certainly be a real Doc. I can not imagine him as anything else.HotShot53 wrote:Is it possible there is another real doc out there than saved the obvious target of DY? And Safari really is an insanity or delusional doc?
When there is no-one to look at, I usually go after whomever has been inactive/scummarizing the most... but I guess everyone was here since no-one had something to go on lol
I hate to do this to you, but I can't ignore the fact that there was no kill, and ga7 had to be replaced. There is the remote chance the kill was never sent in...and I have nothing else to go on.
VOTE Metfanmax
LOL...haha...Yes...the only option is to lynch me. Pressuring me with votes and getting a claim? Nah...let's just lynch Neb!Metsfanmax wrote:The rest of us have something to go on -- the fact that you showed up in the note. Would it be the worst thing to lynch Neb, just so we can find out whether we can 'trust' the notes from Jack (if they are in fact from Jack?)Nebuchadnezer wrote:Hey, Mr. Sneaky McSneakers, sneaking back into this game! Okay, so you replace ga7.Metsfanmax wrote:Agreed. The BBC series makes his skills as a doctor more prominent than the stories do, IIRC, but nevertheless he is a real doctor and it makes total sense, assuming that Watson/Holmes are 'town'.Iron Butterfly wrote:Dr. Watson would most certainly be a real Doc. I can not imagine him as anything else.HotShot53 wrote:Is it possible there is another real doc out there than saved the obvious target of DY? And Safari really is an insanity or delusional doc?
When there is no-one to look at, I usually go after whomever has been inactive/scummarizing the most... but I guess everyone was here since no-one had something to go on lol
I hate to do this to you, but I can't ignore the fact that there was no kill, and ga7 had to be replaced. There is the remote chance the kill was never sent in...and I have nothing else to go on.
VOTE Metfanmax
Although this isn't a vote, it sounds pretty close to an OMGUS by recommending lynching the guy who just voted you... and if you think he should be lynched why didn't you vote him, other than it would have been an obvious OMGUS vote? I hate to do it after you just joined, but neb's suggestion combined with your OMGUS-like post will cause me to vote metsfanmaxMetsfanmax wrote:The rest of us have something to go on -- the fact that you showed up in the note. Would it be the worst thing to lynch Neb, just so we can find out whether we can 'trust' the notes from Jack (if they are in fact from Jack?)Nebuchadnezer wrote:Hey, Mr. Sneaky McSneakers, sneaking back into this game! Okay, so you replace ga7.Metsfanmax wrote:Agreed. The BBC series makes his skills as a doctor more prominent than the stories do, IIRC, but nevertheless he is a real doctor and it makes total sense, assuming that Watson/Holmes are 'town'.Iron Butterfly wrote:Dr. Watson would most certainly be a real Doc. I can not imagine him as anything else.HotShot53 wrote:Is it possible there is another real doc out there than saved the obvious target of DY? And Safari really is an insanity or delusional doc?
When there is no-one to look at, I usually go after whomever has been inactive/scummarizing the most... but I guess everyone was here since no-one had something to go on lol
I hate to do this to you, but I can't ignore the fact that there was no kill, and ga7 had to be replaced. There is the remote chance the kill was never sent in...and I have nothing else to go on.
VOTE Metfanmax
I obviously didn't say that we shouldn't try to force a claim. I just said that even the worst case scenario where we don't do that (or you don't claim) is not that bad, because we still get information. You admit that we have no idea who the note is from or what it means, so we should be actively trying to figure that out.Nebuchadnezer wrote:LOL...haha...Yes...the only option is to lynch me. Pressuring me with votes and getting a claim? Nah...let's just lynch Neb!Metsfanmax wrote:The rest of us have something to go on -- the fact that you showed up in the note. Would it be the worst thing to lynch Neb, just so we can find out whether we can 'trust' the notes from Jack (if they are in fact from Jack?)Nebuchadnezer wrote:Hey, Mr. Sneaky McSneakers, sneaking back into this game! Okay, so you replace ga7.Metsfanmax wrote:Agreed. The BBC series makes his skills as a doctor more prominent than the stories do, IIRC, but nevertheless he is a real doctor and it makes total sense, assuming that Watson/Holmes are 'town'.Iron Butterfly wrote:Dr. Watson would most certainly be a real Doc. I can not imagine him as anything else.HotShot53 wrote:Is it possible there is another real doc out there than saved the obvious target of DY? And Safari really is an insanity or delusional doc?
When there is no-one to look at, I usually go after whomever has been inactive/scummarizing the most... but I guess everyone was here since no-one had something to go on lol
I hate to do this to you, but I can't ignore the fact that there was no kill, and ga7 had to be replaced. There is the remote chance the kill was never sent in...and I have nothing else to go on.
VOTE Metfanmax
...if it was an OMGUS vote, then wouldn't I have voted? Your own statement defeats your argument. If what I wanted right now was for Neb to be lynched, I would have voted for him. I don't want that right now. I simply rebutted his implication that there are zero active leads. And there's a huge difference between OMGUS, and the fact that no one is still talking about the elephant in the room (the note about Neb/Flores).HotShot53 wrote: Although this isn't a vote, it sounds pretty close to an OMGUS by recommending lynching the guy who just voted you... and if you think he should be lynched why didn't you vote him, other than it would have been an obvious OMGUS vote? I hate to do it after you just joined, but neb's suggestion combined with your OMGUS-like post will cause me to vote metsfanmax
Nebuchadnezer wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:Official Vote
Alright, it has officially dropped to SEVEN (7) to lynch!
It will drop to SIX (6) in around 24 hours...s!
That was three days ago...