Moderator: Community Team
Cought a glance at the old mirror there, haven't we?madmitch wrote:WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT ?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
I'm confused. You checked aage, got a result for mandy, and think that aage and dakky were swapped?william18 wrote:Night one I didn't do anything, I wanted to preserve the options incase a doctor or cop died night 1, so that I could fill in. Night two, I decided to investigate Aage, since I was confident he was town, so I wanted to do a sanity check. My result came back, saying that mandalorian was town. So unless there is some other role responsible, I think there is a bus driver in this game, that switched aage with dakky. I think busdriver is too powerful of a role for mafia, so I assume he's town. I still have two more investigation shots, so I'd rather not get lynched.
yep and I cracked itmandalorian2298 wrote:Cought a glance at the old mirror there, haven't we?madmitch wrote:WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT ?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
My 2wc was to survive to have the game last to day 6. I'm assuming this is to incentivise picking doctor over cop.Marashu wrote:@william - what's your 2WC?
I don't really agree with that. And the more I thought about the differences between lynching dakky vs not lynching him, the more interesting it got. So im gonna break it down, case by case.aage wrote:I don't consider his role a threat to town right now. It's kill power we can enlist.
Since the worst thing that could happen is he shoots another town, I suggest we limit those chances. Help him find a target if you must.
Voting the inactive isn't a perfect solution here. I'd rather have him replaced and hear some new thoughts. Lynching him won't reveal anything new, while lynching me would... at least you'd know I said the truth and then you'd know who to look at. So your vote "for the sake of voting" looks scummy to me, especially when you say I should be lynched anyway as the game goes on. Why choose someone inactive over active lynchee? Looks like you gave your vote just to stay out of the fray.HotShot53 wrote: Well, after that summary... AoG is the only one that I'm currently leaning scum on, so I will vote Army of GOD. One of my neutral reads is probably his scum buddy.
He's not inactive enough to be replaced, he posts once in a while... so I don't think replacement is an option now. He's inactive enough to be scummarizing and trying to stay out of everything though, and is completely non-helpful to town.dakky21 wrote:Voting the inactive isn't a perfect solution here. I'd rather have him replaced and hear some new thoughts. Lynching him won't reveal anything new, while lynching me would... at least you'd know I said the truth and then you'd know who to look at. So your vote "for the sake of voting" looks scummy to me, especially when you say I should be lynched anyway as the game goes on. Why choose someone inactive over active lynchee? Looks like you gave your vote just to stay out of the fray.HotShot53 wrote: Well, after that summary... AoG is the only one that I'm currently leaning scum on, so I will vote Army of GOD. One of my neutral reads is probably his scum buddy.
I agree, voting an inactive isn't going to tell us much at this point.dakky21 wrote:Voting the inactive isn't a perfect solution here. I'd rather have him replaced and hear some new thoughts. Lynching him won't reveal anything new, while lynching me would... at least you'd know I said the truth and then you'd know who to look at. So your vote "for the sake of voting" looks scummy to me, especially when you say I should be lynched anyway as the game goes on. Why choose someone inactive over active lynchee? Looks like you gave your vote just to stay out of the fray.HotShot53 wrote: Well, after that summary... AoG is the only one that I'm currently leaning scum on, so I will vote Army of GOD. One of my neutral reads is probably his scum buddy.

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
You DO NOT know if I will become SK and neither do I know. Being so sure that I will, I may have to agree it's best to lynch me today then. But as I said probability isn't 75%, it's 50% every night. I might end this game as town. SO YES, lynch me now to win with town (but town won't win) or let me live and we'll see how it turns out.mandalorian2298 wrote:One thing that I just realized hasn't been raised yet: dakky, do you realize that your chances to win if we lynch you today while you are still Townie are much better then when you become SK?
So far he did not. I'd know that from role PM I guess.mandalorian2298 wrote:The other thing, which falls into the realm of hard core meta-gaming: Between jester, killer PRs and might-morphing-maybe-SK, I am beginning to think that DoomYoshi was in a Jigsaw kind of mood while he was comming up with this setup. If this is so, wouldn't it be plausable that he has attached another effect to dakky's transformation, like adding Nuke or PGO powers to dakky once he turns. I'm just saying.
This whole situation with you wanting to lynch me reminds me of one of my favorite 'Monty Python' scenes... this one... practically the same situation ongoing here.mandalorian2298 wrote:BTW, this whole situation with me wanting to lynch dakky because of his morphood and all of you guys refusing to do it because he is Townie reminds me of one of my favorite 'Simpsons' scenes
I might end this game as a lottery winner.dakky21 wrote:You DO NOT know if I will become SK and neither do I know. Being so sure that I will, I may have to agree it's best to lynch me today then. But as I said probability isn't 75%, it's 50% every night. I might end this game as town. SO YES, lynch me now to win with town (but town won't win) or let me live and we'll see how it turns out.mandalorian2298 wrote:One thing that I just realized hasn't been raised yet: dakky, do you realize that your chances to win if we lynch you today while you are still Townie are much better then when you become SK?
Great scene! May we build a bridge out of you to prove your innocence?dakky21 wrote:This whole situation with you wanting to lynch me reminds me of one of my favorite 'Monty Python' scenes... this one... practically the same situation ongoing here.mandalorian2298 wrote:BTW, this whole situation with me wanting to lynch dakky because of his morphood and all of you guys refusing to do it because he is Townie reminds me of one of my favorite 'Simpsons' scenes

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
Again and again, I will ask you: If you flip the coin and 9 times in a row get the head, what is the chance 10th time it will flip head again? The only mathematical truth is - 50%. You're hiding behind numbers just like William is.mandalorian2298 wrote:So it is 50% that you will turn in any one night, 75% that you will turn in at least one of two nights and 87.5% that you will turn in at least one of any three nights. Your continuing attempts to live in deniel of these simple mathematical truths is a reason why sport betting is such a profitable industry.
Honestly dakky, everytime you try to 'correct' us on probability, I cringe. Everything mandalorian said is right. His approximation is correct, and that is indeed how people calculate odds in the real world. The odds of you staying town decrease every night, since it is less and less likely to win consecutive coin flips. If you can't even concede to that being intuitively true, than you are not being very forthright with your role and how dangerous it is to town.dakky21 wrote:Again and again, I will ask you: If you flip the coin and 9 times in a row get the head, what is the chance 10th time it will flip head again? The only mathematical truth is - 50%. You're hiding behind numbers just like William is.mandalorian2298 wrote:So it is 50% that you will turn in any one night, 75% that you will turn in at least one of two nights and 87.5% that you will turn in at least one of any three nights. Your continuing attempts to live in deniel of these simple mathematical truths is a reason why sport betting is such a profitable industry.
The flaw with your thinking dakky is that you are assuming the first 9 flips are heads... in that case, yes, the 10th time will be 50-50 chance still. However, at this point, we don't know that the next few flips will be heads... so the odds of either the next or the second flip to be tails is 75% because you need both flips to be heads for it not to happen - 50% (tails) chance of the first flip, plus 50% (heads) x 50% (then tails) = 25% for the second flip = 75% overall. If you add a third night it's + 50% (heads) x 50% (heads) x 50% (tails) = 12.5%, plus the first two nights that we still don't know the results of at this point, and it's 87.5% that at least one of the next three nights comes up tails.dakky21 wrote:Again and again, I will ask you: If you flip the coin and 9 times in a row get the head, what is the chance 10th time it will flip head again? The only mathematical truth is - 50%. You're hiding behind numbers just like William is.mandalorian2298 wrote:So it is 50% that you will turn in any one night, 75% that you will turn in at least one of two nights and 87.5% that you will turn in at least one of any three nights. Your continuing attempts to live in deniel of these simple mathematical truths is a reason why sport betting is such a profitable industry.
I have an investigative role, and you still want to lynch me over a a vig/sk? Lynching dakky answers so manys questions. It can confirm or deny your role, it can confirm or deny if he is sk or mafia. If he really is an sk, then this tells the roleblocker he targeted mafia or the doctor that they stopped a kill. Killing dakky is an all around a safer option since he's more likely to kill town than mafia. Also, with dakky still alive, we can never be sure that he is still town, or even that all other town threats at eliminated until the mod declares it. I'm baffled that your still voting me, unless of course you don't want dakky to flip, since your role is not authentic?madmitch wrote:If I remember right ,Aage started this whole VIG thing, and I am still wondering how he knew that ? seems scummy to me, Will and Mandy are hiding behind numbers some make sense but I think it is just a diversion, I called Will and Marashu out and neither has yet denied my claim.AOG hasn't posted for a while so I am not to sure about him? but I would not vote for him for that reason. Hot Shot you should vote for someone else for now, I am still sticking with William he seems the scummiest so far.
You are misunderstanding the argument, or purposefully misrepresenting it. Right now the coin has been flipped once. What are the odds the next 9 flips will all be heads? I promise you, the mathematical truth is not 50%.dakky21 wrote:Again and again, I will ask you: If you flip the coin and 9 times in a row get the head, what is the chance 10th time it will flip head again? The only mathematical truth is - 50%. You're hiding behind numbers just like William is.mandalorian2298 wrote:So it is 50% that you will turn in any one night, 75% that you will turn in at least one of two nights and 87.5% that you will turn in at least one of any three nights. Your continuing attempts to live in deniel of these simple mathematical truths is a reason why sport betting is such a profitable industry.
That is not the case here. What are the chances that if you flip the coin twice you get tails at least once? 75% Thrice? 87.5%dakky21 wrote:Again and again, I will ask you: If you flip the coin and 9 times in a row get the head, what is the chance 10th time it will flip head again? The only mathematical truth is - 50%. You're hiding behind numbers just like William is.mandalorian2298 wrote:So it is 50% that you will turn in any one night, 75% that you will turn in at least one of two nights and 87.5% that you will turn in at least one of any three nights. Your continuing attempts to live in deniel of these simple mathematical truths is a reason why sport betting is such a profitable industry.

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.