But if he had claimed V he wouldn't have survived the night.pmchugh wrote:EBWOP for ya, if he had claimed to be a member of the OOTS, then obviously we wouldn't have lynched him.MeDeFe wrote:Nice job kwan.
Moderator: Community Team
But if he had claimed V he wouldn't have survived the night.pmchugh wrote:EBWOP for ya, if he had claimed to be a member of the OOTS, then obviously we wouldn't have lynched him.MeDeFe wrote:Nice job kwan.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
You agreed he should be the first to claim after will.MeDeFe wrote:But if he had claimed V he wouldn't have survived the night.pmchugh wrote:EBWOP for ya, if he had claimed to be a member of the OOTS, then obviously we wouldn't have lynched him.MeDeFe wrote:Nice job kwan.
I agreed with the proposed order because it put me far towards the back.pmchugh wrote:You agreed he should be the first to claim after will.MeDeFe wrote:But if he had claimed V he wouldn't have survived the night.pmchugh wrote:EBWOP for ya, if he had claimed to be a member of the OOTS, then obviously we wouldn't have lynched him.MeDeFe wrote:Nice job kwan.
Anyway we should probably shut up.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
[nightspam]Because you are scum but hoped someone would drop a bad claim and be lynched before you had to claim?[/nightspam]MeDeFe wrote:I agreed with the proposed order because it put me far towards the back.pmchugh wrote:You agreed he should be the first to claim after will.MeDeFe wrote:But if he had claimed V he wouldn't have survived the night.pmchugh wrote:EBWOP for ya, if he had claimed to be a member of the OOTS, then obviously we wouldn't have lynched him.MeDeFe wrote:Nice job kwan.
Anyway we should probably shut up.

No, because I knew that if a scum claimed my char on false premises I would probably be able to dismantle them completely.spiesr wrote:[nightspam]Because you are scum but hoped someone would drop a bad claim and be lynched before you had to claim?[/nightspam]MeDeFe wrote:I agreed with the proposed order because it put me far towards the back.pmchugh wrote:You agreed he should be the first to claim after will.MeDeFe wrote:But if he had claimed V he wouldn't have survived the night.pmchugh wrote:EBWOP for ya, if he had claimed to be a member of the OOTS, then obviously we wouldn't have lynched him.
Anyway we should probably shut up.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.

Intresting what changed your mind from yesterday?spiesr wrote:All right, will, "O-chul" or should I say Redcloak, you have some explaining to do...
It was nice of the mafia and serial killer to work on killing each other off for us, we now have a chance again. (I hope.)
Vote william for being an evil goblin cleric and harboring the twice deceased evil lord sheepofdumb.
So the role list plays out as follows:
Elan
Roy
Redcloak = William
Monster in the dark
???
I am not sure what the last one is, but since them didn't counter william's claim I wonder if they are anti-town.
Should we continue the claims or not?
Makes sense to me, reading the scenes I can't see how you are wrong, he was protected by sheep it appears. unvote vote william It's likely we have two scum left plus one other role and tough townie could easily be a fake claim.spiesr wrote:The scene makes it fairly clear that Thog attacked the same person that he failed to kill last night and that that person is clearly Redcloak and therefore scum.
So you are saying here spiesr is right?william18 wrote:Spiesr, how do you know I got attacked last night?? .

You claimed to be the person who survived the attack by Thog on night 2. The night 3 scene clearly stated that the same person was attacked again by Thog. This time the scene also showed that the person being attacked was mafia. Specifically it dropped clues that they were Redcloak, Xykon's goblin cleric who carries the phylactery the keeps Xykon from being permanently killed. I almost fell sorry for you that you were going along okay and on the verge of victory but were screwed over by a night scene.william18 wrote:Spiesr, how do you know I got attacked last night?? Unless you have hard proof, you can't be sure, and frankly, the mod doesn't tell me if im attacked either(I think since im not sure ive been attacked yet).
I think it is better no-one claims yet, it will just help your remaining mafia buddy kill off the biggest role tomorrowwilliam18 wrote:Also, has it not occured to you that both Redcloak, and me can be the game? I think we should get everyone else to claim first before we become hasty and start lynching. We should not be hasty. Hmm, hasty folk.

So then, are you mafia who just won the game, or was I right about william18, or don't you know?nagerous wrote:vote william
theres the hammer
I'm guessing/hoping you are right about william, I know the sudden immediate hammer after your post may seem suspicious but it was sincere, I just don't want to waste any more time with people claiming.spiesr wrote:So then, are you mafia who just won the game, or was I right about william18, or don't you know?nagerous wrote:vote william
theres the hammer





