We need a one day challenge to make this more fun. We can use Eastern Standard time. Guesses in by 6:00 pm. I'll end it around Noon the next day. If your within three up or down 1 point. If you nail it then 10 points.
Maybe a simple change like calling "foeing" "fearing" instead might help, just as an opening idea for an improvement. I doubt many of the folks who have foes at the moment use the "foeing" function to confront their "foes"- most use it to avoid contact with them altogether.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
We are down to 5,425. The foe button, even well intended, will hasten our already deep decline. Nothing is so infuriating than seeing a great game with lots of great players and your blocked by a someone you only played one game against, EVER....and there were no complaints during the game!
HitRed wrote:We are down to 5,425. The foe button, even well intended, will hasten our already deep decline. Nothing is so infuriating than seeing a great game with lots of great players and your blocked by a someone you only played one game against, EVER....and there were no complaints during the game!
your theory on removing the foe feature = CC salvation is ludicrous, HR. if anything, foeing keeps people around as it enables them to block out anyone they deem undesirable and carry on with their CC experience. what is your fascination with this crusade???
That's why I think changing the terms to "fearing" might be better. I'm sure there's a better term, but making it less macho sounding to be afraid of someone....
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
Symmetry wrote:That's why I think changing the terms to "fearing" might be better. I'm sure there's a better term, but making it less macho sounding to be afraid of someone....
Symmetry wrote:That's why I think changing the terms to "fearing" might be better. I'm sure there's a better term, but making it less macho sounding to be afraid of someone....
I get it, machoism would make most avoid it.
Exactly. Consider "fearing" more as a placeholder. Someone will come up with a better way of phrasing it.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
riskllama wrote:lol - it's like you two are in a burning building, deciding what type of footwear is appropriate to put on to go outside in. carry on, i guess...
RL- you don't have to burn down every suggestion.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein