Moderator: Tournament Directors
Sorry about that. I must have clicked back or something.Zorg_rsk wrote:You seem to ahev missed the results for all of the games in our group:
The games are here:
Dijbouti wins (2-0) 5th Round
Micronesia wins (2-0) 6th Round
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
It seems like, at least for the first knockout round, that the lower-seeded team (since it's all #1 in group X vs. #2 in group Y) should have to play on the higher seeds home map/settings, so that there's a bit more of an advantage to winning one's pool rather than just a theoretically favorable matchup.GreecePwns wrote:I added the rules for the knockout stage to the first post. As of now, I think I will make the rules according to the remaining teams' home rules, with the majority being used.
Also, I will start the 5th round of games soon.
I was considering that, but what about the second round and so on? We can't base it on the group stage performances, because they weren't playing against the same opponents.Incandenza wrote:It seems like, at least for the first knockout round, that the lower-seeded team (since it's all #1 in group X vs. #2 in group Y) should have to play on the higher seeds home map/settings, so that there's a bit more of an advantage to winning one's pool rather than just a theoretically favorable matchup.GreecePwns wrote:I added the rules for the knockout stage to the first post. As of now, I think I will make the rules according to the remaining teams' home rules, with the majority being used.
Also, I will start the 5th round of games soon.
Just my .02
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
The first round of the knockout stage takes place on the #1 team's home field. All subsequent rounds would be played on, say, classic unlimited, with cards being determined by the majority stated preference (i.e. home field preference) of the remaining teams.GreecePwns wrote:I was considering that, but what about the second round and so on? We can't base it on the group stage performances, because they weren't playing against the same opponents.Incandenza wrote:It seems like, at least for the first knockout round, that the lower-seeded team (since it's all #1 in group X vs. #2 in group Y) should have to play on the higher seeds home map/settings, so that there's a bit more of an advantage to winning one's pool rather than just a theoretically favorable matchup.GreecePwns wrote:I added the rules for the knockout stage to the first post. As of now, I think I will make the rules according to the remaining teams' home rules, with the majority being used.
Also, I will start the 5th round of games soon.
Just my .02
Not complicated at all. I'll use this format.Incandenza wrote:The first round of the knockout stage takes place on the #1 team's home field. All subsequent rounds would be played on, say, classic unlimited, with cards being determined by the majority stated preference (i.e. home field preference) of the remaining teams.GreecePwns wrote:I was considering that, but what about the second round and so on? We can't base it on the group stage performances, because they weren't playing against the same opponents.Incandenza wrote:It seems like, at least for the first knockout round, that the lower-seeded team (since it's all #1 in group X vs. #2 in group Y) should have to play on the higher seeds home map/settings, so that there's a bit more of an advantage to winning one's pool rather than just a theoretically favorable matchup.GreecePwns wrote:I added the rules for the knockout stage to the first post. As of now, I think I will make the rules according to the remaining teams' home rules, with the majority being used.
Also, I will start the 5th round of games soon.
Just my .02
A bit complicated, but it seems fair.
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.

Portugal is playing though. They have a replacement.Thunderbolt wrote:Thanks a lot, we don't need to join the game as Portugal isn't playing anymore, so that's another lot of points for us
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.
He is on your team, but your game ended in a forfeit.Forza AZ wrote:Are you supposed to play me? I didn't have a PM yet, so I'm not sure which game I have to enter (I have signed up as replacement last week here).Thunderbolt wrote:We are still waiting after about 36 hours
Chariot of Fire wrote:As for GreecePwns.....yeah, what? A massive debt. Get a job you slacker.
Viceroy wrote:[The Biblical creation story] was written in a time when there was no way to confirm this fact and is in fact a statement of the facts.