Page 15 of 94

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 6:31 pm
by jnd94
wicked wrote:and I didn't "get on firth's case", merely questioned his one post.
Yes, and when I say "get on firth's case", I mean dedicating more than 1 or 2 posts to a seemingly harmless post. (Except for the vote)
wicked wrote:well duh gaga, what am I supposed to say when I vote him, "would scum please bandwagon now?" :lol:
wicked wrote:hmm, where did I jump on nags? and I would never try to divert attention with only a handful of votes on me anyway.

remember the first rule of scumminess boys: townies act like scum, scum are agreeable. so getting all up in arms over me know only proves that I'm town.
wicked wrote:umm OK firth, so this quote is me "jumping all over nag"????

So firth, have you played much mafia? Just curious...
happy?

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 6:46 pm
by The1exile
OK, I'll buy that claim by AK. I can't see the scum getting any benefit out of framing a day 1 lynch anyway. unvote vote wicked

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 6:55 pm
by trestain
unvote vote wicked

AK lets see if your right

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 7:05 pm
by MountainLion
I've seen AK at odds with wicked in a past game, so I could easily see him using a one-time investigation right off the bat on her. Plus I've been suspicious of wicked through the whole argument with Anark.

unvote

vote wicked


I agree with the "FOS" on trestain.

vote count please! :D

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 7:08 pm
by freezie


Unvote

Vote: wicked



Let's see if AK is lying or not.

:lol: Wicked is always scum it seems..

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 7:11 pm
by jnd94
I dont know about you guys, but Im liking this blue voting color more than Aimless's red, and a LOT more than bolded. Everywhere really had something.... :lol:

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 7:21 pm
by Fircoal
jnd94 wrote:I dont know about you guys, but Im liking this blue voting color more than Aimless's red, and a LOT more than bolded. Everywhere really had something.... :lol:
I think that Everywhere had the color red. And just wait until NV5. ;)

Well for the game thing I think that AK is probably telling the truth and if he isn't we can always lynch him tomarrow. ;)

Also, for those who think being threatened to be modkilled isn't enough for me to stop posting, check out one of Spin's games. I think it was that Prison one. I also got modkilled there too, and I stopped posting a lot and I really started losing interest. yes, I worry about being modkilled, so that why I haven't spammed yet. And besides, now it's past the spamming time. Random votes are done. For now. ;)

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 7:21 pm
by Fircoal
unvote, Vote: Wicked

oops, I forgot to add that in. ;)

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 7:23 pm
by wicked
IC is lying his head off or is an insane cop.

Why would you claim day 1? When people were actively going after me anyway?

I have no problems being lynched, if it'll mean IC goes next. :twisted: I have nothing to hide. Let me claim before dropping hammer... give me a sec to re-read my role.

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 7:24 pm
by jnd94
Fircoal wrote:
jnd94 wrote:I dont know about you guys, but Im liking this blue voting color more than Aimless's red, and a LOT more than bolded. Everywhere really had something.... :lol:
I think that Everywhere had the color red. And just wait until NV5. ;)

Well for the game thing I think that AK is probably telling the truth and if he isn't we can always lynch him tomarrow. ;)

Also, for those who think being threatened to be modkilled isn't enough for me to stop posting, check out one of Spin's games. I think it was that Prison one. I also got modkilled there too, and I stopped posting a lot and I really started losing interest. yes, I worry about being modkilled, so that why I haven't spammed yet. And besides, now it's past the spamming time. Random votes are done. For now. ;)
What, are we all going to be roleblockers, and have to vote in olive?

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 7:25 pm
by wicked
I'm Ganner Rhysode, a Jedi Knight. Other Jedi Knights know I have two options each night.

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 7:25 pm
by kwanton
AK_iceman wrote:I had a 1 time use investigation which I could use whenever I wanted. I didn't want to use it Day 1, but I wanted to know if I could trust wicked during the game. So after a couple questionable posts, I sent in the request. Mandy confirmed that wicked is scum.

I don't mind claiming now, because I no longer have any power. If the mafia decide to night-kill me now, it'll be no big loss. It is possible wicked has a role similar to a miller, but that's a minority. Either way, my vote ain't changing unless someone can provide better proof that they discovered a mafia.
At first I didn't think her and nark's argument was consequential in the least, but this is more than enough to deserve a vote.

unvote fircoal

vote wicked

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 7:26 pm
by wicked
my my, an awful quick bandwagon by supposedly experienced players. tsk tsk.

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 7:26 pm
by kwanton
wow took me way too long to read.....fastposted by a retarded amount....

was that the hammer or can I still unvote?

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 7:27 pm
by freezie
Unvote

Ok wicked, I'll let you my vote off for now.

Now quote your pm. It's not against the rules in this game ;)..



* Going to re-read the rules, in case I am mistaken*[/b]

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 7:27 pm
by Serbia
wicked wrote:my my, an awful quick bandwagon by supposedly experienced players. tsk tsk.
No bandwagon for me, I voted before the cop claim. But killing you will settle that end.

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 7:28 pm
by kwanton
guess it ain't too late.

unvote


anyway now i kinda believe wicked. either way we have at least one scum.

now we pick between wicked and AK.

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 7:29 pm
by jnd94
Hmmmm......Well, her story checks out, its a real character in the same star wars period. I checked, just in case. Before i unvote, i want to wait to see if there are any counter-claims. If not, I'll unvote.

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 7:29 pm
by wicked
That's 11 with freezie's unvote. It takes 16 to lynch. I will not quote my role PM directly, b/c in doing so will reveal too much to the scum. Other Jedi Knights know what I'm talking about (I hope, they may have differences in their PM's).

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 7:30 pm
by freezie
Or we wait until she can quote her role..

If she can't, we know she's lying.

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 7:30 pm
by wicked
what counter-claim would there be? It's obvious there's more than one Jedi Knight, as there's one fighting in the duel and that's not me.

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 7:31 pm
by wicked
freezie, I already gave you enough info if you're a Jedi Knight. What info would you like for me to quote? My Win Condition? hold on....

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 7:31 pm
by The1exile
i don't buy it. That smells to me like a last ditch attempt at getting the real ganner to counterclaim, thus scoring a massive strike for the scum, who can now kill possibly the most powerful jedi here.

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 7:32 pm
by freezie
Vote: Wicked

Back to my vote on you.

You already revealed a lot to the scum. At worst, AK will go down.

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 7:32 pm
by kwanton
wicked wrote:what counter-claim would there be? It's obvious there's more than one Jedi Knight, as there's one fighting in the duel and that's not me.
i think he meant counter-claim the name.