In betiko's defense, Duka, I assumed your question was rhetorical as well, especially since you said the idea of a nameclaim without roleclaiming makes no sense to you.Dukasaur wrote:I am implying nothing.betiko wrote:interesting. so if you think it could brng nothing useful to town, how would it bring more to antitown? because basically what you are implying if i understand well is that we would have more to lose and less to gain.Dukasaur wrote:Makes no sense to me.
What useful information is gained from claiming names if you're not claiming roles anyway?
You're assuming if I ask a question that it must be rhetorical, and that there must be some hidden implication. There isn't; it's just a question. This is my fourth mafia game, and I didn't win any of the previous three, so I'm just figuring things out as I go along.
I can see what use there is in claiming roles, and I see what use there is in claiming nothing at all, but I honestly don't know what use there is in a compromise measure. What will we know from a name claim that we don't already know? It's my question, and it is NOT rhetorical, but really a question.
A roleclaim might force town power roles to fakeclaim in order to avoid being targeted by scum or the SK at night.
A nameclaim without roles would give us an idea of who is town and who isn't without potentially revealing town power roles to the scum and the SK.
I could very easily be wrong, but that's the way I see it.
