Moderator: Community Team
With votes? Is there someone particularly scummy you are looking at without votes or am i reading too much into this?spiesr wrote:I'll operate under the assumption that TheForgivenOne is telling the truth and that his investigation is accurate for the time being. Therefor: Unvote Vote DoomYoshi, he is the scummiest person with votes on them right now after Neb.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
No I agree with you....bandwagonstrike wolf wrote:With votes? Is there someone particularly scummy you are looking at without votes or am i reading too much into this?spiesr wrote:I'll operate under the assumption that TheForgivenOne is telling the truth and that his investigation is accurate for the time being. Therefor: Unvote Vote DoomYoshi, he is the scummiest person with votes on them right now after Neb.
Not at present.strike wolf wrote:With votes? Is there someone particularly scummy you are looking at without votes or am i reading too much into this?
Okay, god. You started the jonty wagon, then jumped off just like I did. If what I did was scummy, then why are you less scummy?DoomYoshi wrote:So if I am scum, why would I directly antagonize your pointless Neb wagon? Why would I lead the charge on jonty? I am batting 100, and town is helpless without me.
You can all beg for forgiveness now by voting blakebowling.
Now he'll probably say that you're not scummy because he is "antagonizing your wagon", but your point is correct and we all know who Doom wanted to lynch yesterday.Nebuchadnezer wrote:Okay, god. You started the jonty wagon, then jumped off just like I did. If what I did was scummy, then why are you less scummy?DoomYoshi wrote:So if I am scum, why would I directly antagonize your pointless Neb wagon? Why would I lead the charge on jonty? I am batting 100, and town is helpless without me.
You can all beg for forgiveness now by voting blakebowling.
Vote BlakeStubbsKVM wrote:I don't see any reason to doubt TFO's claim. I wasn't putting Neb anywhere near my scum pool yet, so I'm glad the town investigation cleared him.
The GF option is still there of course, but I'm not going to give it much attention for now.
That leaves us with very few options for now. If blake doesn't post anything soon, I'm voting for him.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
When did I unvote?Nebuchadnezer wrote:Okay, god. You started the jonty wagon, then jumped off just like I did. If what I did was scummy, then why are you less scummy?DoomYoshi wrote:So if I am scum, why would I directly antagonize your pointless Neb wagon? Why would I lead the charge on jonty? I am batting 100, and town is helpless without me.
You can all beg for forgiveness now by voting blakebowling.
The alternative is no lynch. It is blake lynch for no lynch. By saying you want a vig shot, you are saying you don't want town to lynch people. Scummy.strike wolf wrote:Voting blake remains retarded. Replace or vig. Those are the best options that we have for an inactive. I like how the ones voting blake continue to do so without addressing why vigging is a bad option.
Id also like to wonder if you know how unlikely that blake is to be mafia. First of all, it is stafistically against themand secondly, good mafia are fairly proactive about inactive members within the group.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
You're right. I was sure I read someone suggesting an investigation somewhere, but i read back to night 1 and couldn't find it.strike wolf wrote:No ones talking about investigating Blake. The only discussion of investigations are TFO's on Neb and investigating TFO to which I made an argument to why I pointed that out as being paranoid.
There are 4 roles that are exceptionally common in mafia. The two most common are docs and cops, followed by roleblocker and vig. No role is guaranteed but the chances are fairly good that there is a vig. If there isnt than weve spent today scum hunting and looking for new leads and can reconsider lynching the inactive tomorrow.
this kind of slapped me in the face. I've been stalling on this game, when obviously we're going to need some information.edocsil wrote:Bah. Doom is right on all regards. Inactives kill the game, make it not fun due to the inability to deal with them weighing down votes, and are a general pain in the ass. The only reason this has been an issue to point it out was because it delayed our short day. We really need to resolve this fast, else this coming lynch is going to be decided by just a few votes because we in fact do not need a majority to lynch.
I would HIGHLY recommend forcing one of them (neb/doom/other scummies) to claim quickly, analyze the information and make a plan from there regarding a lynch, but we don't want to hang people who haven't claimed for several reasons.
We can't waste time here, so if you haven't weighed in on these issues or voted, please do so shortly or your voices will be ignored.
Funny, / dropped hints of jonty's role and saf was in a "Whose Line" mood even though it ended up being TFO.safariguy5 wrote:Can I just say that I really enjoyed /'s post? I read it in a Drew Carey "Who's line is it anyways" voice in my head.
Aren't we all in a Whose Line mood? After all, whose forum is it anyway?!DoomYoshi wrote:Funny, / dropped hints of jonty's role and saf was in a "Whose Line" mood even though it ended up being TFO.safariguy5 wrote:Can I just say that I really enjoyed /'s post? I read it in a Drew Carey "Who's line is it anyways" voice in my head.
