Moderator: Community Team
If ya want something from me. Stop ignoring my question.StorrZerg wrote:Yeah. .. his statement directly implies 3rd party or second mafia faction imo.
While this talk is interesting, we should move away from him today.
I'd rather us focus on strike hotshot, maybe wing.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
I'll acknowledge it. It's something that I'm going to bring up.strike wolf wrote:I asked a question Storr. Do you want to acknowledge it?


Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
TeeGee wrote:That won't happen as I am not convinced anyone is mafia just yet... and from playing a couple of other games I gathered that's a scummy thing to doWingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Bets on TeeGee providing the Hammer?
It was worded as "only remaining faction". It does in fact say faction, but that is all I am going to say because quoting it directly is a mod kill (which is why I worded it differently the first time).Streaker wrote:Could be nothing, that's why I'm not sure.
It's just that in most (if not all) games I played all victory conditions are exact copies for all players.
He said 'I win when when town is last faction standing'. It is completely different from what I would have expected, because my victory condition is formulated quite differently... Like I said, not sure what to make of it. But I consider it important enough to bring out as it could indicate he is third party.
Massclaim on D1 with a closed setup and an infinite number of flavour possibilities. Don't see how that could work.
persianempire wrote:its when ur food goes bad... you get spoils
Well, you are obviously not the same kind of town as the rest of us... has anyone seen a third party or scum doc? Or is NoS not a doc at all?NoSurvivors wrote:It was worded as "only remaining faction". It does in fact say faction, but that is all I am going to say because quoting it directly is a mod kill (which is why I worded it differently the first time).Streaker wrote:Could be nothing, that's why I'm not sure.
It's just that in most (if not all) games I played all victory conditions are exact copies for all players.
He said 'I win when when town is last faction standing'. It is completely different from what I would have expected, because my victory condition is formulated quite differently... Like I said, not sure what to make of it. But I consider it important enough to bring out as it could indicate he is third party.
Massclaim on D1 with a closed setup and an infinite number of flavour possibilities. Don't see how that could work.
What do you consider standing out Strike? Actually asking relevant questions? Picking up on perceived scum behavior? Are you saying that starting the ball rolling on NOS and having him claim does not stand out. Just asking.strike wolf wrote:As far as other cases beyond Wing:
1. Streaker-his last few comments suggest knowledge of town's win condition. This is a big town tell. I won't say it proves him town as he did not specifically say anything that proves he knows the town win condition but for me it was enough of a town tell that I would not consider voting him at the moment.
2. Hotshot-I am getting more of a town read from him now. He has been reasonably active and aggressively pushing the IB case.
3. NoS-As Storr and Streaker have both noted, he seems to have a different win condition from the one they were given and the one that I was given. This could be a scum slip and I am not sure I agree with Storr that we should ignore it to go into other cases.
4. IB-I would have to reread. He hasn't done too much that has really stood out to me on my first read through.

Breaking Bad Mafia. Third Party Sal- the Lawyer- He was a Doc. Drove us insane trying to decide weather to lynch him or not.HotShot53 wrote:Well, you are obviously not the same kind of town as the rest of us... has anyone seen a third party or scum doc? Or is NoS not a doc at all?NoSurvivors wrote:It was worded as "only remaining faction". It does in fact say faction, but that is all I am going to say because quoting it directly is a mod kill (which is why I worded it differently the first time).Streaker wrote:Could be nothing, that's why I'm not sure.
It's just that in most (if not all) games I played all victory conditions are exact copies for all players.
He said 'I win when when town is last faction standing'. It is completely different from what I would have expected, because my victory condition is formulated quite differently... Like I said, not sure what to make of it. But I consider it important enough to bring out as it could indicate he is third party.
Massclaim on D1 with a closed setup and an infinite number of flavour possibilities. Don't see how that could work.

Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Looks like scum is trying to lynch the doc so they don't have to do it in the night, lolstrike wolf wrote:I have seen the truth and the truth is unvote Vote NoS.. Its not just the difference in win condition. Its the kind of apologetic/trying not to upset tone he has had. This could be a town tone true but like I said earlier, town is more likely to get stubborn when called out. Its the natural feeling of "Im town, I am telling what I see is the truth so my word holds weight" and it is something that is difdicult to fake for mafia. Wing and Hotshot have shown glimpses of it and I am coming around to them being town in part because of this. NoS has not.
As far as can there be a scum doc? Yes it didnt used to be compleyely uncommon when there was a second killing faction and/or town had a high killing chance. Third party not so much. Their protective abilities usually focus on self-preservation. A 3p doc would point to a 3p faction more than individual survivors. An exception would be Saul Goodman in Breaking Bad.
Fped: Lol.
persianempire wrote:its when ur food goes bad... you get spoils
Not the most experienced player, but I believe the logic of getting 1 of the limited number of mafia members for one townie (even if it is the doc) would be worth it for town, based on sheer size of the game and the amount of townies there likely are.Army of GOD wrote:strike, I understand what you're saying, but what do you make of no one counter claiming NoS? If you still think he's scum, that means (not tying to WIFOM, but these are the only logical conclusions I can think of) (a) you think there aren't any town docs and (b) the real town doc is keeping quiet, maybe because they don't want to out themselves.
just asking from an experience standpoint, but how many times does (b) happen in games? (the doc doesn't counter claim this early to make sure they don't give themselves up to the mafia so quickly)
persianempire wrote:its when ur food goes bad... you get spoils
I agree, but it depends solely on the doc realizing this.NoSurvivors wrote:Not the most experienced player, but I believe the logic of getting 1 of the limited number of mafia members for one townie (even if it is the doc) would be worth it for town, based on sheer size of the game and the amount of townies there likely are.Army of GOD wrote:strike, I understand what you're saying, but what do you make of no one counter claiming NoS? If you still think he's scum, that means (not tying to WIFOM, but these are the only logical conclusions I can think of) (a) you think there aren't any town docs and (b) the real town doc is keeping quiet, maybe because they don't want to out themselves.
just asking from an experience standpoint, but how many times does (b) happen in games? (the doc doesn't counter claim this early to make sure they don't give themselves up to the mafia so quickly)
Ohh me again. Tell you what instead of speaking in generalities make a case against me.HotShot53 wrote:So... how likely is it that DY gave different win conditions to different members of town? I am very cautious about lynching a claimed doc... but I've not seen different win conditions before, and NoS definitely has a different one from me and others, so maybe there is no doc and he was given it as a safe fake claim? Or could be more than one mafia factions, and he is a real doc for one of them.
Also note that IB had no idea why streaker was questioning the role claim... when it should have been obvious to anyone with the town win condition. So I wouldn't be surprised if there are two scum factions, and IB is in the other one.

Ugh. Not sure if NoS is scum or not, but I hate these situations where we might catch someone because of the very type of obvious situation the rules about claiming are intended to avoid.HotShot53 wrote:So... how likely is it that DY gave different win conditions to different members of town? I am very cautious about lynching a claimed doc... but I've not seen different win conditions before, and NoS definitely has a different one from me and others, so maybe there is no doc and he was given it as a safe fake claim? Or could be more than one mafia factions, and he is a real doc for one of them.
Also note that IB had no idea why streaker was questioning the role claim... when it should have been obvious to anyone with the town win condition. So I wouldn't be surprised if there are two scum factions, and IB is in the other one.

Page 14:NoSurvivors wrote: Not the most experienced player, but I believe the logic of getting 1 of the limited number of mafia members for one townie (even if it is the doc) would be worth it for town, based on sheer size of the game and the amount of townies there likely are.
And a couple of posts later he retracted that statement due to my point about not knowing how many docs we have.Streaker wrote:If there is another doc out there, you should claim now. I believe trading 1 doc for 1 mafia is good.
A bit odd that NoS is still throwing it out there.Streaker wrote:I take back what I said about another doc claiming.
Odd statement calling out Storr, myself, Nos, Rishaed and yourself for swinning votes. What do you hope to achieve with this? Besides the fact that it is perfectly acceptable on D1 (in a game this size) to feel out the waters. A lot of players are calling others out, but are not advancing pressure because they do not vote. If anything, you should be calling out the players who haven't placed vote yet.Iron Butterfly wrote:Ofcourse we have to be carefull, but undeniably there is still something fishy.HotShot53 wrote:So... how likely is it that DY gave different win conditions to different members of town? I am very cautious about lynching a claimed doc... but I've not seen different win conditions before, and NoS definitely has a different one from me and others, so maybe there is no doc and he was given it as a safe fake claim? Or could be more than one mafia factions, and he is a real doc for one of them.
...I can agree with caution on lynching a claimed doc.
Tell us how you know what others players win conditions are besides yours?
I called it out to see how people react, and now I can be certain because of a number of players confirming it's different. It doesn't really advance town position and we should move away from him on D1 because of the possibility that EVERYONE'S wincon is different.
I backed off my statement because I didn't pause to consider the 'possibly unbalanced' setup.
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Vote Count (No guarantee of accuracy - Blue is a joke vote, lighter blue is an active joke vote)
Army of GOD (0) - StorrZerg, virus90
rishaed (0) - Hotshot53, Iron Butterfly, strikewolf Virus Storr,
WingCmdr (4) - Wing Mtam Mets, Storr, Tails, Rishaed, Streaker, Strike, NoS
TeeGee (0) - Streaker Tails
metsfanmax (0) - mtamburini Streaker, NoS
Streaker (2) - metsfanmax, TeeGee Strikewolf Virus,Wing
StorrZerg (1)- NoSurvivors, Tails Hotshot Tails, NoS
virus90 (0) - rishaed
IronButterfly (1) - Tails Hotshot
Hotshot (3) - Mtam, NoS, Storr AoG, Wing, Storr, Mets, IB, Streaker
Mtam (0) - Rishaed
NoS (2) - Rishaed, IB, Storr, Streaker, Wing, Mtam
StrikeWolf (1) - Storr
Points of Note - Storr, Streaker, NoS, Wing, Rishaed are the main swing voters by my count.
Rishaed has been at the start of 3 votes, Mtam, NoS and finally Wing. Streaker has followed him on two.
There is a substantial amount of information here that will have meaning after the first night and onwards