Moderator: Community Team



We may know or not know it, but it still looks like you tried to defend him to the very end.HotShot53 wrote:but anyone who has played scum when I am scum also knows I'm more likely to throw a fellow scum under the bus than defend them

Something interesting to note is that I and HotShot were both scum in Indigo Mafia, and in that game Hotshot didn't try to defend me, but he also didn't vote me. He was one of the very few at the end of the day who pretty much left their vote open until the very last moment. So him defending benga is a bit out of character but I also don't think he would throw a scum under the bus like he says he would. So that makes this a half-truth, or more importantly a half-lie. My question is, why lie?HotShot53 wrote: I know my defending him looks bad after his flip... but anyone who has played scum when I am scum also knows I'm more likely to throw a fellow scum under the bus than defend them, especially on day 1 when it's pretty obvious that's where the lynch is going.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.

Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
You mean like this?Also I'm a bit surprised about the one NK, I was still expecting a mafia + SK in a game of this size?


Then when the benga case was in full swing:aage on page 6 wrote:Interesting, are you saying there might not be any town and we're all on our own?Samlen wrote:Came up this almost immediately after I posted that last bit, but since civ is usually a free for all maybe that's what this game is? The whole civilized vs uncivilized is just a flavor way of saying 'beat all of the other civs'.Samlen wrote:Well also the main point of Civ is to take out all of the other civs or win by being more scientific/cultural/religious. It could be that some of our civs view some of the other civs as 'uncivilized.' Like the romans could view norway as uncivilized for basically being a bunch of vikings.benga wrote:I am just interested how many of you have actually played civ, cause from what I read here most of you just don't understand references to the game.
There are no uncivilized nations in game, there are nations and there are barbarians.
@stike wolf, so you are saying all of us got the same pm with same roles?
So yeah, even though he apologized for inactivity during the night he basically had weeks and chose to post what looks like a beginning of day 1 post instead of participating in the crucial argument. I want to hear from him, but also Hotshot on who they think is scum.aage on page 11 wrote:
Uncultured barbarian.
Vote wing
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Well, when I saw what benga flipped I figured I'd get some votes for defending him. Obviously it's an easy case to make, so it wouldn't be surprising if a scum jumped on the case trying to look like they are scum hunting.Ragian wrote:So what do you think of the people voting for you, hotshot?
As ga7 said I realized that aage pointed out barbarians as well as benga did, before it was confirmed that barbarians are really in the game (scene where benga is lynched happens later). So Strike, "just being inactive" can be an alignment pointer if you take the barbarian thing in consideration.aage wrote:Uncultured barbarian.
aage wrote:There is no arguing with this logic. Excellent points. Dakky's brilliant plan must be a double bluff!Skoffin wrote:"HURRRBURBLUR I AM JAPAAAAAAN!" is what I take from your comment. What has Japan done for me lately? Stolen my boyfriend and turned him into a weebo. You are no ally of mine, Sir.
But this is is I believe your suggestion there. You may very well be Great Britain, and you may be afflicted with mad cow. This doesn't sound very beneficial to me and may very well disrupt my own stocks, therefore I must close any and all trade with you. If there's no trade between our borders, I don't need you. AWAY WITH YE!
Also, are you going to answer my question Dakky? All the civilisations in the game are considered civilised. The clue is in the phrasing. We have no idea what criteria MM used to determine who is the scum. For all we know, Gandhi is a serial killer. As you said, think outside the box![]()
(am I doing this right?)
Fastposted
FoS Tim for being a blood-thirsty barbarian.
That's actually a really good point. Benga more or less outright stated that he knew it was barbarians vs civs but aage is also one of the people that seemed more confident that it was barbarians vs civs as well. Considering only the barbarians actually knew this, i'd say that's enough to warrant a vote.dakky21 wrote:As ga7 said I realized that aage pointed out barbarians as well as benga did, before it was confirmed that barbarians are really in the game (scene where benga is lynched happens later). So Strike, "just being inactive" can be an alignment pointer if you take the barbarian thing in consideration.aage wrote:Uncultured barbarian.
So I'll go ahead and vote aage

I wasn't trying to be condescending. But since you insist, here's your "reading between the lines" case:nagerous wrote:Thanks for condescending to show up with your presence.
If you cannot see the strength of the case against benga and the number of scum tells he made then you are pretty damn scummy yourself. It was not luck that we got him it was clever play by those reading between the lines.
Yeah, you caught me. I always announce my night kill targets with my vote from the previous day.madmitch wrote:seem s fishy that the only one to vote for Wing was Aage and a pow wing got killed that night
I don't think he is scummy for defending benga, I think hotshot is scummy because he is playing a similar style of game to Indigo League - noncommittal, sparse posting, not overly bothered by what is happening in the discussion. While Skoffin and Fircoal don't think his meta could be applied to this game, I'm keeping my votes on him until I see an overall improvement in his posts and if another lead takes us somewhere.Samlen wrote:Because I'm too lazy to reread the entire thread right now, what i'm getting is that people think hotshot is scummy for defending benga. I reread the past 5ish pages and hotshot's posts don't seem entirely unreasonable for a town sided person or a scummy person. I'm more interested in how quickly people jumped on him today and those that have disappeared (Like aage...)
As I have already mentioned, i'm not trying to take credit for anything. The posts I made were to air out my thoughts concerning the end of the last day - that I came to the conclusion that benga was scum through the arguments put forth by others, notably Fircoal, and by his own last posts. Saying that, I stick by my comments that if he was a survivor, I don't think it was worth voting him on day 1 because it would put town at a disadvantage. Considering he flipped scum, congrats to those who read between the lines better than I.strike wolf wrote:As for Skittles, the comment alone I could go either way. It does sound a bit like he was trying to take credit for thinking Benga was scum at the end of the day but it by itself is not worth a vote and I would need to reread his posts to come to any conclusion.
I also defended him and I have no votes apart from you. Did you even read Day 1? I was one of the most vocal to not vote for the possible survivor claim. The way I defended him and the way you defended him was totally different. As I've already stated, you are playing similarly to how you played in Indigo, and you turned up scum there, and I have a feeling you're scum here too.HotShot53 wrote:Well, when I saw what benga flipped I figured I'd get some votes for defending him. Obviously it's an easy case to make, so it wouldn't be surprising if a scum jumped on the case trying to look like they are scum hunting.Ragian wrote:So what do you think of the people voting for you, hotshot?
Skittles' post saying he was suspicious of benga, but never actually saying or doing anything about it before the lynch, while jumping on my bandwagon seems to be the most suspicious to me, so I will vote skittles
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "

Who are you thinking is scum at this moment? You seemed to be suspicious of Samlen day one and Ga7 but haven't heard too much from you this day phase.Ragian wrote:I like what Nag just posted in relation to the hotshot wagon. I don't agree on the aage vote, though. Even despite aage's lack of participation. Seems weird to look for inactives when an actual case is on the block (whether you like the case or not).
Following this on the phone, I'm not sure if hotshot has responded to the accusations or not yet?
