Moderator: Community Team
It is impossible to have a one man mafia, that would be an SK. Mafia are a group not one individual thats how they work. If there is only one mafia in this game then there are actually no mafia in the game becuse you cant have just one if you know what I mean.farside22 wrote:.
Now Pmc if you know for fact mafia has a partner by all means let us know so we can lynch you.
He claimed a role that could confirm himself the next night. In my opinion that was worth the risk of not lynching him. If Nate had survived the night and claimed he got blocked or just got a result of someone not being mafia, I would have had no further objections lynching him. Spiesr on the other had claimed a doc-like role, a role that's not confirmable like a cop is. The fact that there is no counter-claim doesn't mean he's necessarily telling the truth. The real angel might not be willing to claim this early in the game, or there might not even be an angel role in this game. Also, putting the claims aside, spiesr's play has just been so scummy this game, it's off the scales.spaceghst44 wrote:my question to LSU Tiger Josh, drake_259, Sierra_Leon, farside22 is why did you keep voting for spiesr when no one denied his claim?
To let up on something usually means to reduce it?spaceghst44 wrote:vote lsu tiger josh
lets up the pressure and see where this goes.
Yeah but upping the pressure means to increase it, as in rising the pressure. Let up and upping are cmpletely different.spiesr wrote:To let up on something usually means to reduce it?spaceghst44 wrote:vote lsu tiger josh
lets up the pressure and see where this goes.
lmao, if its a tell for sam and LSU then why isnt it a tell for you and SL? Espicially when you look at the time we realised the deadline was imminant and then neither sam nor lsu were active but both you and SL were. You had a clear choice and chose to split the town and lessen or chances of a lynch.farside22 wrote:I need to do what Sierra did. I making note of those who voted against nate not including myself.
Sam_levi_11 and LSU Tiger Josh
I don't put Sierra on this list because everything I read and remember screamed townie to me.
You forgot to actually quote it, did you mean this?Sierra_Leon wrote: Plus, I ran across this quote,
LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Nate right now you are definitely under a cloud of suspicion. I would suggest you get your claim going before you get lynched as I would put my vote on you, but don't want a replacement to hammer you without giving you a chance to defend yourself.
let us up the pressure. there is a s in that word, sorry I forgot the ' oh god of composition.spiesr wrote:To let up on something usually means to reduce it?spaceghst44 wrote:vote lsu tiger josh
lets up the pressure and see where this goes.
When did I say there were 3 mafia? I wasnt alluding to SL being scum as well. I was merely asking why you have double standards. Its ok for you and SL to not vote nate but it isnt for LSU and sam? That seems unfair. In other words why a free pass for you and SL?farside22 wrote:@PMC: Because as Sierra stated I too felt a cop as more informative and the angel claim a little bit hard to swallow. Are you really thinking there are 3 mafia in this set up. Because I get the feeling that is what you are alluding to. Can you explain how that is balanced if that is what you believe? Why a free pass on those who didn't post. Do you know for a fact they were not around? Don't you think scum are more likely not to show up so there is a mislynch then anything else?
pmchugh wrote:When did I say there were 3 mafia? I wasnt alluding to SL being scum as well. I was merely asking why you have double standards. Its ok for you and SL to not vote nate but it isnt for LSU and sam? That seems unfair. In other words why a free pass for you and SL?farside22 wrote:@PMC: Because as Sierra stated I too felt a cop as more informative and the angel claim a little bit hard to swallow. Are you really thinking there are 3 mafia in this set up. Because I get the feeling that is what you are alluding to. Can you explain how that is balanced if that is what you believe? Why a free pass on those who didn't post. Do you know for a fact they were not around? Don't you think scum are more likely not to show up so there is a mislynch then anything else?
I believe that pmc thought that you were saying that the mafia member never had a partner, not that he doesn't have a living one now. I think you both believe that there are 2 mafia members, and I agree with you on that.farside22 wrote:Are you really thinking there are 3 mafia in this set up. Because I get the feeling that is what you are alluding to.
Your missing the point, Im not saying OMG you are scum cause you did that! Im just saying that if you find it suspicious other people are doing this then surely you accept this also puts yourself in a bad light?farside22 wrote:pmchugh wrote:When did I say there were 3 mafia? I wasnt alluding to SL being scum as well. I was merely asking why you have double standards. Its ok for you and SL to not vote nate but it isnt for LSU and sam? That seems unfair. In other words why a free pass for you and SL?farside22 wrote:@PMC: Because as Sierra stated I too felt a cop as more informative and the angel claim a little bit hard to swallow. Are you really thinking there are 3 mafia in this set up. Because I get the feeling that is what you are alluding to. Can you explain how that is balanced if that is what you believe? Why a free pass on those who didn't post. Do you know for a fact they were not around? Don't you think scum are more likely not to show up so there is a mislynch then anything else?
What part of I got a townie read from SL did was missed. Seriously the girl (?) is scum hunting and making points better then others I noticed in the game. If you want to point to something scummy besides her lack of vote on Nate I'm all ears.
pmchugh wrote:Hmm LSU? He's hard to read because he plays consistantly but I doont really think hes scum in this game and not just cause he was linked with me. I don't really have any basis for that rather than just gut feeling and I think others are more suspicious, I realise this will put me in a bad light if he turns up scum but hey you got to tell the truth and take a few risks.
Your missing the point, Im not saying OMG you are scum cause you did that! Im just saying that if you find it suspicious other people are doing this then surely you accept this also puts yourself in a bad light?farside22 wrote:pmchugh wrote:When did I say there were 3 mafia? I wasnt alluding to SL being scum as well. I was merely asking why you have double standards. Its ok for you and SL to not vote nate but it isnt for LSU and sam? That seems unfair. In other words why a free pass for you and SL?farside22 wrote:@PMC: Because as Sierra stated I too felt a cop as more informative and the angel claim a little bit hard to swallow. Are you really thinking there are 3 mafia in this set up. Because I get the feeling that is what you are alluding to. Can you explain how that is balanced if that is what you believe? Why a free pass on those who didn't post. Do you know for a fact they were not around? Don't you think scum are more likely not to show up so there is a mislynch then anything else?
What part of I got a townie read from SL did was missed. Seriously the girl (?) is scum hunting and making points better then others I noticed in the game. If you want to point to something scummy besides her lack of vote on Nate I'm all ears.
Do you know how bad that sounds?farside22 wrote:Oh well I know I'm town.
Now Ive got to say this is suspcious, very suspicious.LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Sierra if you had looked in my game you would know that I'm suffering from the flu. Flu tends to keep people away from reading a lot and posting. I'm getting voted because I found Spiesr more scummy than nate at the time I last voted and never switched after a wagon switched when I wasn't on?
As pointed out before a cop claim is a lot easier to determine something then a type of doc since any joe blow could claim to be a doc while as a cop it is more difficult to determine what is happening. Also cops have to figure out if they are paranoid, naive, true, or backwards. since the pressure is on me as well since i'm not going to be here for the weekend I'll state that I'm a cop and last night got Spiesr as innocent. Night 1 I had done sheep and also got an innocent there. As stated before I wasn't going to try to out myself that early without anything, but seeing how we have someone pushing my lynch for not voting on someone that wound up guilty when I wasn't sure if I was naive or not. I just know that I can investigate each night.
Right now I'm most suspicious on far side for trying to cast himself out of the light and focusing all his attention here. If I die during the night guys remember that Spiesr is innocent from my investigation.
Lynch all liars?LSU Tiger Josh wrote:I am not the cop.spiesr wrote:I will likely believe nate's claim once drake_259, spaceghst44 and LSU Tiger Josh post and confirm that they cannot counter it by being a cop who has powers every night...
LOL, did you by any chance miss the scene where nick was reveiled to be the cop?LSU Tiger Josh wrote:since the pressure is on me as well since i'm not going to be here for the weekend I'll state that I'm a cop and last night got Spiesr as innocent. Night 1 I had done sheep and also got an innocent there. As stated before I wasn't going to try to out myself that early without anything, but seeing how we have someone pushing my lynch for not voting on someone that wound up guilty when I wasn't sure if I was naive or not. I just know that I can investigate each night.
