Moderator: Community Team
This seems slightly fishy, but maybe I suck at presenting cases or something, oh wellz.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
i have a new found respect for you man lol finally someone does something to move the game along
unvote vote pmc for one this case is well thought out and is the best case today
two..because it has merit and we need some kind of pressure on him
three...because someone finally made another case
wishy-washyjonty125 wrote:unvote looks like joking is over. I aren't going to vote zimmah, for not getting a joke; but if we get seriously desperate, I would move my vote for a lynch or a claim
instigating the BS case on zimmah when it was just dying downjonty125 wrote:Zimmah, do you have any reason not to believe freezie was joking?
hoping on PMC waggon and pushing for a claim.jonty125 wrote:L-2 claim time. We have 8 days, that should be enough and Doom did say he wouldn't give another extension.pmchugh wrote: Had to look back to your reasons and I can explain this rather easily... I voted him in a protest vote and in the hope of getting answers.
Now it seems the deadline is looming and that I have been chosen as the random bandwagon for day 1, which I can say is a first. Sadly you are all hopelessly wrong, I am going to go and reread and post all my thoughts so that hopefully I can give you guys a better alternative. I really really don't want to have to claim.
Actually mod can we get a few days extension on this deadline? Most of day 1 has been pish but we are finally making progress?
the quote you posted was mostly a joke cause i was waiting for a better case to present itself so thats why i did that and i beliebe i said i would do that earlier in the gameHaggis_McMutton wrote:Ugh, these prolonged debates between experienced players on D1 annoy me... you just know it's going nowhere.
I don't really feel the case against PCM or PMC, both of them explained themselves well imo (also could you guys have more confusing nicknames, jeez).
I do find it interesting that the case on PMC seems quite similar to my case on jonty, only where my case went nowhere, the one on PMC got to L-3 pretty fast and received reactions like:
This seems slightly fishy, but maybe I suck at presenting cases or something, oh wellz.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
i have a new found respect for you man lol finally someone does something to move the game along
unvote vote pmc for one this case is well thought out and is the best case today
two..because it has merit and we need some kind of pressure on him
three...because someone finally made another case
Anyway, I still don't really see any slips in here, so I've got to stay with my gut on jonty. To recap:
wishy-washyjonty125 wrote:unvote looks like joking is over. I aren't going to vote zimmah, for not getting a joke; but if we get seriously desperate, I would move my vote for a lynch or a claim
instigating the BS case on zimmah when it was just dying downjonty125 wrote:Zimmah, do you have any reason not to believe freezie was joking?
hoping on PMC waggon and pushing for a claim.jonty125 wrote:L-2 claim time. We have 8 days, that should be enough and Doom did say he wouldn't give another extension.pmchugh wrote: Had to look back to your reasons and I can explain this rather easily... I voted him in a protest vote and in the hope of getting answers.
Now it seems the deadline is looming and that I have been chosen as the random bandwagon for day 1, which I can say is a first. Sadly you are all hopelessly wrong, I am going to go and reread and post all my thoughts so that hopefully I can give you guys a better alternative. I really really don't want to have to claim.
Actually mod can we get a few days extension on this deadline? Most of day 1 has been pish but we are finally making progress?
strike wolf wrote:And what would you have to say to the fact that the main argument against PMC was also a major part on the case that had been made against you? Namely "beating a dead horse" with the whole Zimmah case.jonty125 wrote:I was voting for the better case; the one with the most scumtells.strike wolf wrote:On top of Jonty's previous cases this post just looks like easy bandwagon hopping:
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Well @ L-2, its normally claim timeHaggis_McMutton wrote:hoping on PMC waggon and pushing for a claim.jonty125 wrote: L-2 claim time. We have 8 days, that should be enough and Doom did say he wouldn't give another extension.
The case on PMC also is based on him saying "look at me I'm going against the grain" and then goes back to going with the grain.strike wolf wrote:Jonty never answered my question either:
strike wolf wrote:And what would you have to say to the fact that the main argument against PMC was also a major part on the case that had been made against you? Namely "beating a dead horse" with the whole Zimmah case.jonty125 wrote:I was voting for the better case; the one with the most scumtells.strike wolf wrote:On top of Jonty's previous cases this post just looks like easy bandwagon hopping:
But no one was making an effort to try and explain what was wrong, just telling him he was wrong. That's what I was trying to do. I stopped because I realized that wasn't going to work. And offer alternatives? We were fresh out of the joke vote stage! Why am I obligated to provide an alternative, especially at such an early stage of the game?You completely shifted the question. What you were saying was increasing the pressure on him, you never even hinted that you thought the case was poor and you offered no alternatives. What you claim to believe and the manner in which you posted are contradictory.
It's distracting. It's annoying. It helps no one at all. And if you dominate the discussion, you're the one who decides what we talk about. Hijack the game and town is helpless. Seems scummy to me. trollface.jpgI was asking what the benefits of mafia pushing a dead case were. That is what you are accusing me of doing to Zimmah (although I disagree) and I have yet to hear why this is scummy.
I'm gonna go ahead and do it. Look what it got me.pmchugh wrote:p.s. @ everyone if you want to post about something else.. no one is stopping you.
[ent voice]Anything worth saying is worth taking a very long time to say[/ent voice]Submarining is not the same as being inactive. Submarining is choosing to be inactive, i.e. reading the thread, knowing what is going on, having time to post and still not posting anything because you don't want to give anything away. Fircoal was inactive, you openly admitted to submarining.
Well, that makes no sense whatsoever, but I'll humor you. Explain what exactly about my advice-giving suggests scumminess.Obviously giving advice is not an automatic mafia tell. You need to consider the manner, timing and way in which you give advice just as with every other possible tell. So yes, it was targeted at you specifically.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
I actually agree with you on the underlined part, fair enough.pancakemix wrote: But no one was making an effort to try and explain what was wrong, just telling him he was wrong. That's what I was trying to do. I stopped because I realized that wasn't going to work. And offer alternatives? We were fresh out of the joke vote stage! Why am I obligated to provide an alternative, especially at such an early stage of the game?
I think you are vastly over stating the effect one player has in an 18 player game. I am hardly gonna sit there and think that I am gonna get away with distracting the town all the way to the end of the day. I was attracted attention myself and I knew it.It's distracting. It's annoying. It helps no one at all. And if you dominate the discussion, you're the one who decides what we talk about. Hijack the game and town is helpless. Seems scummy to me. trollface.jpgI was asking what the benefits of mafia pushing a dead case were. That is what you are accusing me of doing to Zimmah (although I disagree) and I have yet to hear why this is scummy.
I agree, this is going nowhere fast. unvoteHaggis_McMutton wrote:Ugh, these prolonged debates between experienced players on D1 annoy me... you just know it's going nowhere.
You'd be surprised. I've seen it more than a few times.I think you are vastly over stating the effect one player has in an 18 player game. I am hardly gonna sit there and think that I am gonna get away with distracting the town all the way to the end of the day. I was attracted attention myself and I knew it.
True enough.Ugh, these prolonged debates between experienced players on D1 annoy me... you just know it's going nowhere.
I don't really feel the case against PCM or PMC, both of them explained themselves well imo (also could you guys have more confusing nicknames, jeez).
I'm interested in your jonty case, but how are you getting from A to B on this last point here?Haggis_McMutton wrote:hoping on PMC waggon and pushing for a claim.jonty125 wrote:L-2 claim time. We have 8 days, that should be enough and Doom did say he wouldn't give another extension.pmchugh wrote: Had to look back to your reasons and I can explain this rather easily... I voted him in a protest vote and in the hope of getting answers.
Now it seems the deadline is looming and that I have been chosen as the random bandwagon for day 1, which I can say is a first. Sadly you are all hopelessly wrong, I am going to go and reread and post all my thoughts so that hopefully I can give you guys a better alternative. I really really don't want to have to claim.
Actually mod can we get a few days extension on this deadline? Most of day 1 has been pish but we are finally making progress?
Alright, so what were you doing then?jonty125 wrote:The case on PMC also is based on him saying "look at me I'm going against the grain" and then goes back to going with the grain.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Did he really go back to going with the grain? Only way I see him back to going with the grain is to the extent he was trying to defend himself. I still feel your vote on him was a cheap bandwagon vote.jonty125 wrote:Well @ L-2, its normally claim timeHaggis_McMutton wrote:hoping on PMC waggon and pushing for a claim.jonty125 wrote: L-2 claim time. We have 8 days, that should be enough and Doom did say he wouldn't give another extension.
The case on PMC also is based on him saying "look at me I'm going against the grain" and then goes back to going with the grain.strike wolf wrote:Jonty never answered my question either:
strike wolf wrote:And what would you have to say to the fact that the main argument against PMC was also a major part on the case that had been made against you? Namely "beating a dead horse" with the whole Zimmah case.jonty125 wrote:I was voting for the better case; the one with the most scumtells.strike wolf wrote:On top of Jonty's previous cases this post just looks like easy bandwagon hopping:
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Yeah, I explained that poorly, those are actually 2 points.pancakemix wrote:I'm interested in your jonty case, but how are you getting from A to B on this last point here?Haggis_McMutton wrote:hoping on PMC waggon and pushing for a claim.jonty125 wrote:L-2 claim time. We have 8 days, that should be enough and Doom did say he wouldn't give another extension.pmchugh wrote: Had to look back to your reasons and I can explain this rather easily... I voted him in a protest vote and in the hope of getting answers.
Now it seems the deadline is looming and that I have been chosen as the random bandwagon for day 1, which I can say is a first. Sadly you are all hopelessly wrong, I am going to go and reread and post all my thoughts so that hopefully I can give you guys a better alternative. I really really don't want to have to claim.
Actually mod can we get a few days extension on this deadline? Most of day 1 has been pish but we are finally making progress?
There was a prod Tuesday. Weekends aren't a great time, but one will come on Monday.Rodion wrote: Yoshi, massprod please? Thanks in advance!
ghostly447 wrote: *Freezie and VS connection??? Freezie's random vote on VS for "The sake of lynching someone" still not removed for a VERY long time.
And I still say I beleive PMC's question has been answered, directly or indirectly. Zimmah stated his oppinion before, and PMC asked for his oppinion after. If PMC had stated his question '' Did you change your oppinion about Freezie'' then it would be a completly different thing. For now, I keep to my words.Rodion wrote: Freezie believes Zimmah answered PMC's question (I disagree). Zimmah voted PCM for supposedly insisting on something that was settled (I don't think it was settled). Shield also votes because of the dead horse beating thing. Clever sheeped Kratos. Jonty didn't mention who he sheeped, but it's clear that he sheeped. Eldario's vote might actually be legit as well, but I'd have to reread what PMC said about his vote on Zimmah.
tl;dr: he is being BWed because you guys were ready to move on and he (imo, correctly) wasn't.
And I aknowledged the fact that it may not be a lyncher after all. I also kept saying I didn't think Zimmah scum. ''quick turn around'' doesn't really seems to make sense when I do beleive you were trying too hard on someone I doubt to be scum.pmchugh wrote:freezie- Quick turn around from sticking up for me to suspected me- I don't understand why. Also attempted to push third party claim onto zimmah, this is often done by mafia when they see suspicious behaviour. This was reduced by the fact it was "lyncher" that he chose but he is still not completely off the hook IMO.

not sure, probably VS because, even though he always acts scummy, he's pretty silent this time.Rodion wrote:I see a growing trend into ending the PMC BW and starting one on Jonty. I'll say that Jonty always strikes me as the kind of guy that will sheep votes, so he's not more scummy in this particular game for doing something he always does. If we are going Jonty in a move that from my point of view seems to be a policy lynch, why not VS instead? To me VS's meta is more anti-town than Jonty's and would therefore make for a slightly better PL.
As far as finding behaviour that actually makes me think someone is more likely to be scum than your average player, I'm still at a loss.
Nagerous, can you clarify why you did not vote PMC after mentioning your opinion on him shifted 180º ("U-turn")?
Zimmah, if you had to unvote PMC, who would you vote next? If the answer is anything other than Freezie, please explain why.
Kratos, how do you feel about Clever and Jonty's votes on PMC?
Yoshi, massprod please? Thanks in advance!
Yes, I was going with the grain; but I wasn't been a hypocrite.pancakemix wrote: Alright, so what were you doing then?
I'm only silent because I have nothing to say, really. It's all been junk and BS so far. I may say something soon, though.zimmah wrote:not sure, probably VS because, even though he always acts scummy, he's pretty silent this time.Rodion wrote:I see a growing trend into ending the PMC BW and starting one on Jonty. I'll say that Jonty always strikes me as the kind of guy that will sheep votes, so he's not more scummy in this particular game for doing something he always does. If we are going Jonty in a move that from my point of view seems to be a policy lynch, why not VS instead? To me VS's meta is more anti-town than Jonty's and would therefore make for a slightly better PL.
As far as finding behaviour that actually makes me think someone is more likely to be scum than your average player, I'm still at a loss.
Nagerous, can you clarify why you did not vote PMC after mentioning your opinion on him shifted 180º ("U-turn")?
Zimmah, if you had to unvote PMC, who would you vote next? If the answer is anything other than Freezie, please explain why.
Kratos, how do you feel about Clever and Jonty's votes on PMC?
Yoshi, massprod please? Thanks in advance!
Clever is definitely the one that strikes me as the scummier of the two. That might just be due to I've been in games with jonty before but not with clever. For example jonty did this stuff in the first pokemon mafia and ended up being the town's poison doctor if I recall properly.Rodion wrote:Kratos, how do you feel about Clever and Jonty's votes on PMC?
I was town doctor, who was posioned.kratos644 wrote:Clever is definitely the one that strikes me as the scummier of the two. That might just be due to I've been in games with jonty before but not with clever. For example jonty did this stuff in the first pokemon mafia and ended up being the town's poison doctor if I recall properly.Rodion wrote:Kratos, how do you feel about Clever and Jonty's votes on PMC?
As you can see I mentioned a few pages back clever continues to post fluff to appear active and even when he is posting with "substance" it's usually just piggybacking what others have said. I don't want to vote him until I reread and put a solid case together or until someone else does the same but I'm awfully busy this weekend so that probably won't happen until Monday at the earliest.
All my posts were along this lines, maybe I didn't phrase it specifically in that way but I repeatedly said things like he was being bull-headed, he was not retracting his vote and more so he did not retract his suspicions on you. I was clearly accusing him of not changing his opinion.freezie wrote:And I still say I beleive PMC's question has been answered, directly or indirectly. Zimmah stated his oppinion before, and PMC asked for his oppinion after. If PMC had stated his question '' Did you change your oppinion about Freezie'' then it would be a completly different thing. For now, I keep to my words.
and as you can see i promptly responded explaining that i was one of the active pursuers in the zimmah case. and quite frankly im doing the same thing half the damn game is doing being silent. for example VS who hasnt posted for a long ass time and then came in a few post ago to tell you he wasnt gonna talk. and thats exactly what i am doing but i have the curtesy to say one of two things. when i see something worth saying anything then maybe ill say something but right now people are still bickering back and forth. and its annoying and honestly reading it hurts my ears..i have an ear infection.kratos644 wrote:Clever is definitely the one that strikes me as the scummier of the two. That might just be due to I've been in games with jonty before but not with clever. For example jonty did this stuff in the first pokemon mafia and ended up being the town's poison doctor if I recall properly.Rodion wrote:Kratos, how do you feel about Clever and Jonty's votes on PMC?
As you can see I mentioned a few pages back clever continues to post fluff to appear active and even when he is posting with "substance" it's usually just piggybacking what others have said. I don't want to vote him until I reread and put a solid case together or until someone else does the same but I'm awfully busy this weekend so that probably won't happen until Monday at the earliest.
I realize what VS has been doing and were it anyone else I would've already been pushing a case against them but that's just VS for you. I suppose part of this comes from the fact that I've never played a game of mafia with you so I have nothing to make comparisons to and like I said I need to reread when I have more time. After I go back and reread things it's possible my suspicions of you will fade and I'll find a different case.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:and as you can see i promptly responded explaining that i was one of the active pursuers in the zimmah case. and quite frankly im doing the same thing half the damn game is doing being silent. for example VS who hasnt posted for a long ass time and then came in a few post ago to tell you he wasnt gonna talk. and thats exactly what i am doing but i have the curtesy to say one of two things. when i see something worth saying anything then maybe ill say something but right now people are still bickering back and forth. and its annoying and honestly reading it hurts my ears..i have an ear infection.kratos644 wrote:Clever is definitely the one that strikes me as the scummier of the two. That might just be due to I've been in games with jonty before but not with clever. For example jonty did this stuff in the first pokemon mafia and ended up being the town's poison doctor if I recall properly.Rodion wrote:Kratos, how do you feel about Clever and Jonty's votes on PMC?
As you can see I mentioned a few pages back clever continues to post fluff to appear active and even when he is posting with "substance" it's usually just piggybacking what others have said. I don't want to vote him until I reread and put a solid case together or until someone else does the same but I'm awfully busy this weekend so that probably won't happen until Monday at the earliest.