Indeed. But this holiday is so great, that no one wants to get away from it.Neutrino wrote:It's not that difficult to keep half-an-hour every evening open for Mafia-ing...
Moderator: Community Team
Indeed. But this holiday is so great, that no one wants to get away from it.Neutrino wrote:It's not that difficult to keep half-an-hour every evening open for Mafia-ing...
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Down here it is called Mardi GrasNeutrino wrote:I don't think that really counts as "confirmed innocent" as diddle said, ML. A dead cop claiming they investigated you and you came up clean is confirmed. Claiming that "I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you" is nothing of the kind.
Anyways, I think it's awfully odd all the spontaneous vacancies. Is there some sort of obscure US holiday on that I don't know about?
What did I just say?Neutrino wrote:I don't think that really counts as "confirmed innocent" as diddle said, ML. A dead cop claiming they investigated you and you came up clean is confirmed. Claiming that "I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you" is nothing of the kind.
Anyways, I think it's awfully odd all the spontaneous vacancies. Is there some sort of obscure US holiday on that I don't know about?
It appears you're not reading things carefully, thus skimming. Vote NeutrinoMountainLion wrote:He's not confirmed innocent, but he does say he could prove it, but it would out someone else.
*raises hand*kalishnikov wrote:Oh yea, it is Mardi Gras but pretty much only Louisiana/New Orleans celebrate that, and by celebrate I mean get wasted.
I highly doubt Mardi Gras is the cause of everyone's inactivity though.
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD

That's why I said "as diddle said"... I was fully aware that you didn't support what diddle said, but wanted to make my point anyway.MountainLion wrote:What did I just say?Neutrino wrote:I don't think that really counts as "confirmed innocent" as diddle said, ML. A dead cop claiming they investigated you and you came up clean is confirmed. Claiming that "I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you" is nothing of the kind.
Anyways, I think it's awfully odd all the spontaneous vacancies. Is there some sort of obscure US holiday on that I don't know about?
It appears you're not reading things carefully, thus skimming. Vote NeutrinoMountainLion wrote:He's not confirmed innocent, but he does say he could prove it, but it would out someone else.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
That is because I didn't have net for the last 3 days. Got it back now, so have to read again. Sorry for this!MountainLion wrote:We got to keep things moving...
Vote Crab for not adding anything to this game.CrabNebula wrote:For some reason I miss this game. I'll reread and post in a while. Sorry again!
rebelman wrote:obviously you are looking for a woman thats a good cook and likes you to dominate in one on oneJOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:thats why my next wife will be a player from this site. I wont mention who
Something's not right with this. Why did he feel the need to point out that he doesn't have any evidence on scum? Its like he is stressing the fact he doesn't have any which only portrays that he has some! Call me paranoid or something but these are the small things that go unnoticed and actually give out significant clues but I'll leave you all to decide that.LSU Tiger Josh on page 12 wrote:This early when it is against someone that does nothing to contribute to a game of mafia other then submarining and posting "i'm lost" I am very aggressive especially on day 1. If it was someone that I actually believe could be helpful in the game, I wouldn't bother being so aggressive on day 1 as I have no evidence on scum.
How were you sure that we were not gonna hit scum? Its like you know who scum are and you made that statement knowing fully well that none of your scum-buddies were under pressure.kalishnikov wrote:We're not gonna hit scum Day 1, if we do it's pure luck.
I say finish off l-s and move on, day 1 is boring as hell.
I think this is a pointless FOS like FOSing for the sake of it. You can be fairly sure that Fircoal won't make someone who only has net access on the weekends, a cop or a doc.dustn64 wrote:ok, well... rereading the last few (10) pages FOS all who have pointlessly jumped on the bandwagon give her time. I don't want to randomly kill the cop(or doc, or whatever) on day 1. And yes, I think she should be replaced. I don't want to vote for LV yet because he is usually a good mafia player.
Again an FOS for the sake of it. You could have provided a better reason than "before I forget".dustn64 wrote:Oh Yea, FOS SL before I forget.
His vote comes just after lifesaver's claim.dustn64 wrote:ok, I am going to vote her. For the fact that she is only a survivor and the town will not lose much. Her role does sound cool though.
unvote
Vote LS
But Firth is still high on my suspect list.
If I were survivor I would definitely care whether won or not. I survive and town wins, then I win too.dustn64 wrote:I thought I would take out a fraction that does not even care about whether the town wins instead of randomly lynching nonvanilla protown player.
It was quite clear he was pushing her lynch but you still said he was "confused"?kalishnikov wrote:I don't think dustn is scum, I think he was just confused.
You probably didn't notice that I had FOSed Sierra for his bandwagin image and the large bold text accompanying it? Looks it was you who skimmed!kalishnikov wrote: Ok, back to the matter at hand: Sierra made a few good points and I'd like to wait for a comment on the matter by l-s before I make any decisions in that aspect. I will say FOS: crab, with a claim like 'extreme third-party commuter' that receives town-helping gifts, you can't expect people to be suspicious of it. Your FOS of Sierra sounds like a weak defense attempt of l-s OR you skimmed the thread pretty heavily for the last like 5-7 pages (probably it as you say you've been busy with exams). Either way an FOS is in order.
Another skimmerdustn64 wrote:WTF? I understand why you would have an FOS on me, but sierra made very valid points. Please elaborate.
This is the most suspicious of dustn till now. Its like you are downplaying a good argument and passing it off as "its a long post but that doesn't mean its true". And a bit of defending them? If you were interested in hearing their defense you would said that straightforward instead of going around and indicating to them an good argument has been put against them and they must respond to it lest we find scum!dustn64 wrote:Wow, big and convincing post. I'm not sure if I will make my vote yet though. LoVo and Kal should speak up.
ehh??lord voldemort wrote:yar im just reading now...it does sound convinving, i know im not scum. and there is a way for my claim to be proven but it requires outting an important town role.
Exactly! And you didn't realize it until MountainLion pointed it out! Also you can also use WIFOM and say the opposite too.lord voldemort wrote:the whole me and kal thing. i think thats just timing. also me and kal are 2 decent enuf players that if we were both scum we wouldnt link ourselves like this intentionally
And that is why you deserved an FOS?firth4eva wrote:Well ML your FOS on me is wrong because I just skimmed the hell out of Day 1 because it was a fircoal game and his day one's can be very stupid.
Can you point out what posts of yours were taken out for context andkalishnikov wrote:I ALWAYS push for a lynch, every game, every day. If you were in the last few games I've been in (sorry for the metagame here) you'd be pretty fed up with inactives and submariners dragging the game to a complete stop which leads into my reasons for wanting to follow through with the l-s lynch, if you've played with her before you'd know she was useless in a mafia game, the quoted posts taken out of context can very easily be bent to look like they were protecting LoVo, sure, but pretty much any series of posts removed from their original pretext can be spun whichever way the quoter likes.
And you were trying to start a bw when the heat was still there on lovo and kalish? Pretty scummy imho.LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Vote Cena basically all he did in day 1 was post a vote on life saver and then a 2nd post to say that he'll post more on day 1. Neither of those posts were groundbreaking thoughts. Good research on the game so far though ML although I don't think both of them are scum as they are experienced enough to not get themselves linked like that on day 1.
rebelman wrote:obviously you are looking for a woman thats a good cook and likes you to dominate in one on oneJOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:thats why my next wife will be a player from this site. I wont mention who
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
Look up.ga7 wrote:Hrm. I'm not sure about the Dustn lead since I can't really get a read on based on these few comments, but the LSU one looks interesting. In any case, he needs to tell us whether he's been roleblocked or not.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "