Lucarilover240 wrote:Well, got myself a new avatar. I was originally going to make it a dancing lucario gif, but for some reason it wouldn't play when I uploaded it as an avatar.
This was what I originally wanted:
wow we dodged a bullet.
A certain assassin may have had something to do with that.
i thoughts that were are charity assassin event was going to be. i just forgot we were doing that great of charity.
Lucarilover240 wrote:Well, got myself a new avatar. I was originally going to make it a dancing lucario gif, but for some reason it wouldn't play when I uploaded it as an avatar.
This was what I originally wanted:
wow we dodged a bullet.
A certain assassin may have had something to do with that.
i thoughts that were are charity assassin event was going to be. i just forgot we were doing that great of charity.
It's a tough job but someone's got to do it.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Today's fact is about GEORGE WASHINGTON but first a word form our sponsers
CREST have the best teeth you can with CREST
during the Revelation for a period of 8 months Washington was give full control of every form of the government he could use. (this means he was king aka by the (constitutional convention) this is what the roman rebulic did when every it was threatened.
Washington was NOT a good startagist he always wanted to split up his army and attack on multiply fronts. this he learned as a British officer. even though his men where not that trained to do perfect drilling like the redcoats. yet this would prove time and time again a bad thing.
Washington however was a man everyone trusted his men and the people who put him in charge the reason was cause of his humlity. he never asked to be president nor did he ask to be general.
he was good however at giving speeches and was a very loyal to the cause he was the one that could always make people come together.
after the war people want to make Washington king cause they all thought he was the greatest however he just wanted to retire however when he did the new nation almost collapsed without him there to guide the new nation.
if you would like more info just ask.
Last edited by targetman377 on Sun Sep 20, 2009 6:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Good except that the Articles of Confederation were doomed to fail before they were even officially set into law whether Washington was involved with that government or not it would have failed.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:Good except that the Articles of Confederation were doomed to fail before they were even officially set into law whether Washington was involved with that government or not it would have failed.
did you know that the aricals of confedration is the same set up as THE UN!!! and the articals failed what make you think the UN WORKS????
p.s Washington went back to mt Vernen and was not that involed with the articles.
strike wolf wrote:Good except that the Articles of Confederation were doomed to fail before they were even officially set into law whether Washington was involved with that government or not it would have failed.
did you know that the aricals of confedration is the same set up as THE UN!!! and the articals failed what make you think the UN WORKS????
p.s Washington went back to mt Vernen and was not that involed with the articles.
Isn't the UN more of a figure head anyways? Actually the fact that the UN doesn't completely failed is that it's established mostly around countries that have well or at least adequately set up governments already while the US was just starting up and in no situation to do something and wiht bad governments and closer set ups between the colonies (where people could easily travel from one to another all the time) it just didn't work especially since each colonies had their own currency.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:Good except that the Articles of Confederation were doomed to fail before they were even officially set into law whether Washington was involved with that government or not it would have failed.
did you know that the aricals of confedration is the same set up as THE UN!!! and the articals failed what make you think the UN WORKS????
p.s Washington went back to mt Vernen and was not that involed with the articles.
Isn't the UN more of a figure head anyways? Actually the fact that the UN doesn't completely failed is that it's established mostly around countries that have well or at least adequately set up governments already while the US was just starting up and in no situation to do something and wiht bad governments and closer set ups between the colonies (where people could easily travel from one to another all the time) it just didn't work especially since each colonies had their own currency.
there own currency is not the real issue the real issue was the central government had no power it could not raise TAXES!!! it needed dues and the states did not pay there dues. also the states were set up by the british crown and were well established! sorry to prove you wrong there the problem was that the central government had little power and could do nothing the UN has also failed if you ask me its a wast of taxpayers money!
strike wolf wrote:Good except that the Articles of Confederation were doomed to fail before they were even officially set into law whether Washington was involved with that government or not it would have failed.
did you know that the aricals of confedration is the same set up as THE UN!!! and the articals failed what make you think the UN WORKS????
p.s Washington went back to mt Vernen and was not that involed with the articles.
Isn't the UN more of a figure head anyways? Actually the fact that the UN doesn't completely failed is that it's established mostly around countries that have well or at least adequately set up governments already while the US was just starting up and in no situation to do something and wiht bad governments and closer set ups between the colonies (where people could easily travel from one to another all the time) it just didn't work especially since each colonies had their own currency.
there own currency is not the real issue the real issue was the central government had no power it could not raise TAXES!!! it needed dues and the states did not pay there dues. also the states were set up by the british crown and were well established! sorry to prove you wrong there the problem was that the central government had little power and could do nothing the UN has also failed if you ask me its a wast of taxpayers money!
Well the Central government having no power is obvious and they had plenty of power under the british crown but these were more like places that were trying to rebuild and start a new government wafter fighting years of war.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:Good except that the Articles of Confederation were doomed to fail before they were even officially set into law whether Washington was involved with that government or not it would have failed.
did you know that the aricals of confedration is the same set up as THE UN!!! and the articals failed what make you think the UN WORKS????
p.s Washington went back to mt Vernen and was not that involed with the articles.
Isn't the UN more of a figure head anyways? Actually the fact that the UN doesn't completely failed is that it's established mostly around countries that have well or at least adequately set up governments already while the US was just starting up and in no situation to do something and wiht bad governments and closer set ups between the colonies (where people could easily travel from one to another all the time) it just didn't work especially since each colonies had their own currency.
there own currency is not the real issue the real issue was the central government had no power it could not raise TAXES!!! it needed dues and the states did not pay there dues. also the states were set up by the british crown and were well established! sorry to prove you wrong there the problem was that the central government had little power and could do nothing the UN has also failed if you ask me its a wast of taxpayers money!
Well the Central government having no power is obvious and they had plenty of power under the british crown but these were more like places that were trying to rebuild and start a new government wafter fighting years of war.
true however the states have not changed much they were set up by the British to rule and they did a very good job it was practical to keep it that. way