Page 19 of 71
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:43 am
by ga7
Time to do a summary of the Cena thing
Original thought that started the case:
ga7 wrote:cena-rules wrote:vote nag
for 4 reasons
1) being a jerk
2) reacting badly to people trying ohter approaches (hiding domething
3) for having diddle compare himself to you
4) he should always die night 1
ok 2 is the oinly real reason but whatever.
Seeing as I just read the whole thing, I now find your reason particularly bogus: it wasn't about people trying other approaches at all. It looks to me that your mind was decided already on the vote and you just 'filled in the blank' with something that sounded credible. So far this is the scummiest thing in my eyes, so while it's not much, it deserves an
Unvote Vote Cena
cena-rules wrote:SEEMS FAIR. Yeah I was always going to vote nag coz in my eyes he was the scummiest on day 1 other than the noobs but they dont know better
So here Cena admits it was bogus, but then when people question him further he backtracks:
cena-rules (talking about Nag) wrote:I meant that when Clive tried to do something he had a go at clive.
Thats it really
But that's bogus too...
First he gives "BS that looks like a good reason" with his vote, then basically admits he was trying to fool people, then acts like it made perfect sense.
All in all I'm not sure where this will lead us but since Cena & Clive seem a bit linked in their behavior (could be a coincidence but still), I think we might hit gold. Though I'm a bit worried that this seems like the only half-decent case we have today, the day practically passed with very few discussions, thus restricting our options... That ain't good
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:17 am
by Roger Dodger
maybe Cena is an antagonizer??
VOTE= CENA
sorry buddy.
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:08 am
by spurgistan
Unvote: Vote Clive Somehow, I get bad vibes from you. I don't want to lynch cena today.
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:12 am
by diddle
ga7 wrote:Time to do a summary of the Cena thing
Original thought that started the case:
ga7 wrote:cena-rules wrote:vote nag
for 4 reasons
1) being a jerk
2) reacting badly to people trying ohter approaches (hiding domething
3) for having diddle compare himself to you
4) he should always die night 1
ok 2 is the oinly real reason but whatever.
Seeing as I just read the whole thing, I now find your reason particularly bogus: it wasn't about people trying other approaches at all. It looks to me that your mind was decided already on the vote and you just 'filled in the blank' with something that sounded credible. So far this is the scummiest thing in my eyes, so while it's not much, it deserves an
Unvote Vote Cena
cena-rules wrote:SEEMS FAIR. Yeah I was always going to vote nag coz in my eyes he was the scummiest on day 1 other than the noobs but they dont know better
So here Cena admits it was bogus, but then when people question him further he backtracks:
cena-rules (talking about Nag) wrote:I meant that when Clive tried to do something he had a go at clive.
Thats it really
But that's bogus too...
First he gives "BS that looks like a good reason" with his vote, then basically admits he was trying to fool people, then acts like it made perfect sense.
All in all I'm not sure where this will lead us but since Cena & Clive seem a bit linked in their behavior (could be a coincidence but still), I think we might hit gold. Though I'm a bit worried that this seems like the only half-decent case we have today, the day practically passed with very few discussions, thus restricting our options... That ain't good
This has gotta be the first case anybody has put togther in a CC mafia in a long time. Unfortunately, I highly doubt we'll get a reasonable defence from Cena, but what the hell,
unvote vote Cena
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:16 am
by firth4eva
meh unvote vote cena
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:20 am
by lord voldemort
yay a vc!!
nag (2) cena, clive
French (4) minister masket, skoffin, kwan
cena ( 8 ) - french, illy, lsu, crab, spiesr, firth, rd, diddle
clive (2) - nag, spurg
LSU (1) Leaibame
MM10 (2) Neut, shady
M.M (1) firc
15 to lynch
deadline will actually be 19 hours from this post cause i have baseball tomorrow
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:22 am
by Roger Dodger
unvote vote cena
okay then, who could possibly be the real bad guy. Clive? Nag? MM?
now i have to make an effort & think.
and, what's the scoop with frenchie?
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:49 am
by kwanton
unvote
vote cena
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:33 pm
by cena-rules
l-5. I dont claim til l-4 ever
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:42 pm
by muy_thaiguy
vote cena
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:44 pm
by cena-rules
I am Colonel Sam Carter (jack of all trades)
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:52 pm
by diddle
cena-rules wrote:I am Colonel Sam Carter (jack of all trades)
I'm guessing you haven't yet used an ability, as you'd probably use that to back up your claim.
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:53 pm
by cena-rules
oh I did . Thought I put that in
meh investigated rebel. Hes town
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:53 pm
by ga7
Hmm ok. Could anyone enlighten me and the poor folks who don't know shit about Stargate whether this char claim sounds legit?
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:55 pm
by diddle
ga7 wrote:Hmm ok. Could anyone enlighten me and the poor folks who don't know shit about Stargate whether this char claim sounds legit?
Yeah, pretty legit, he's an important character, so JOAT would be a good role.
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:01 pm
by ga7
Alright then, I'll buy it. Good thing you used your investigation night 1, I always see JOATs dying before they could tell anything useful.
Unvote
Any idea to avoid no lynch?
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:02 pm
by muy_thaiguy
*sigh*, now I'm starting to wish I had seen at least some of the series. Unvote.
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:06 pm
by diddle
My vote stays until Cena makes another post.
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:25 pm
by CrabNebula
unvote before I go to sleep...
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:30 pm
by cena-rules
diddle wrote:My vote stays until Cena makes another post.
to say what?
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:48 pm
by diddle
cena-rules wrote:diddle wrote:My vote stays until Cena makes another post.
to say what?
Do you notice anything about this?
diddle wrote:Yeah, pretty legit, he's an important character, so JOAT would be a good role.
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:49 pm
by Fircoal
MEh, I semi-believe Cena's claim. While I know nothing about Stargate, I do know some things. First of all that JoaT is a terrible role. I'd never EVER EVER EVER!!!! put a main character as a JoaT. I would only use that terrible role as a filler role if I'm that stuck. (Note to all people in my future games) Anyway, that's why I disbelieve about Cena's claim, and I don't think LV was here for the stupid JoaT fest.
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:50 pm
by cena-rules
diddle wrote:cena-rules wrote:diddle wrote:My vote stays until Cena makes another post.
to say what?
Do you notice anything about this?
diddle wrote:Yeah, pretty legit, he's an important character, so JOAT would be a good role.
yeah wot about it?
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:50 pm
by Fircoal
diddle wrote:ga7 wrote:Hmm ok. Could anyone enlighten me and the poor folks who don't know shit about Stargate whether this char claim sounds legit?
Yeah, pretty legit, he's an important character, so JOAT would be a good role.
NO!
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:57 pm
by diddle
cena-rules wrote:diddle wrote:cena-rules wrote:diddle wrote:My vote stays until Cena makes another post.
to say what?
Do you notice anything about this?
diddle wrote:Yeah, pretty legit, he's an important character, so JOAT would be a good role.
yeah wot about it?
You don't notice any mistakes?