
Moderator: Community Team
Tisha wrote:Laughed. (:Robinette wrote:
^^^ lol, just kidding about that one ^^^
a little creepy.

They're naTural. Unless boob jobs are legal when you're 14nietzsche wrote: That boob job is worst than mine, and I've been doing it for 2 days only
they are clearly photoshopedxeno wrote:They're naTural. Unless boob jobs are legal when you're 14nietzsche wrote: That boob job is worst than mine, and I've been doing it for 2 days only
One isn't a toilet, but a bidet.Creepers wrote:That bathroom is horrid! She wiped her ass and left the toilet paper dangling on the floor! WTF! And why are there TWO toilets? Is she from Europe where they need two toilets?
xeno wrote:They're naTural. Unless boob jobs are legal when you're 14
SERIOUSLY?xeno wrote: also she makes me hard...

Its not like shes naked or anything. Besides I'm not even entirely sure how old she is, just know shes under 18 when the picture was taken. IRL this chick is like a year younger than me i've been jacking it to her for years.natty dread wrote:xeno wrote:They're naTural. Unless boob jobs are legal when you're 14SERIOUSLY?xeno wrote: also she makes me hard...
Some fucking standards here, people. Fucking pedophiles.
Like I said once before... The only people who make a distinction between pedophilia and ephebophilia are pedophiles.Army of GOD wrote:It's not pedophilia. Pedophilia, as I know it, refers to sexual attraction towards prepubescent chillen. I'm assuming that girl has passed through puberty because her boobs are bigger than my penis (which is an incredible feat considering how incredibly large my penis is). Also, as I said before, the age at which it's okay to be attracted to people is arbitrary and varies with where you live in the world (I'm sure there are ages of consent that are 14 in the world).
Ok how about no, it's not ok even if they're in "insinuating poses" nietzszsfce, that's the same excuse all pedophiles use... they're kids, they're in an age when they're first discovering sex, of course they do stupid things like pose in "insinuating poses" whatever that even means... that doesn't make it ok for you to jerk off to their pics, and it especially doesn't make it ok for you to post their pics on online forums.nietzsche wrote:what? now you can't even jerk off to underage girls even if they have boobs bigger than their head and they take pics in insinuating poses?
come on.

Like I said once before... natty(_)dread is a troll.natty dread wrote:Like I said once before... The only people who make a distinction between pedophilia and ephebophilia are pedophiles.Army of GOD wrote:It's not pedophilia. Pedophilia, as I know it, refers to sexual attraction towards prepubescent chillen. I'm assuming that girl has passed through puberty because her boobs are bigger than my penis (which is an incredible feat considering how incredibly large my penis is). Also, as I said before, the age at which it's okay to be attracted to people is arbitrary and varies with where you live in the world (I'm sure there are ages of consent that are 14 in the world).
.
You can't f*ck kids because they're too young to be able to give consent IT'S NOT ROCKET SCIENCE AOGArmy of GOD wrote:also natty, I'm interested to hear a logical explanation as to why it's wrong
Ok, then it's ok for xeno (if he really is 16) but that still doesn't excuse your behaviour, you sick f*ck.nietzsche wrote:first of all, xeno is like 16 himself, i'd be surprised if he wasn't turn on by 14 year olds.
Oh please, grow a brain. Then maybe you can hard-wire it to NOT GET OFF ON FUCKING KIDS!nietzsche wrote:fourth. WE ARE HARD WIRED TO LIKE THOSE CURVES
More pedophilia apologetics? Wow you're a class act. It doesn't matter if there's a dick photoshopped on her forehead, it's still wrong to post pictures of underage kids on forums - you don't know whether they've been posted against her will or not in the first place, and even if they aren't, she's fucking 14 years old, you're basically taking advantage of a child.nietzsche wrote:second. girls nowadays develop (physically) faster, so perhaps when the arbitrary line was drawn they didn't see 14-year olds like that
third, that girl is photoshopped, so basically doesn't exist in real life, she is a creating of technology, in the first pic you can clearly see how her boobs were modified, look right between them.

ooh look at me, i am aog and i say stupid things all the timeArmy of GOD wrote:So according to natty, laws define morality.
Therefore, Jews were actually immoral in Nazi Germany. Thanks for clearing that up.

no one here is trying to f*ck any kid. just visualizing fucking them to get that nutnatty dread wrote:
i can't believe i actually have to explain to you guys why it's wrong to f*ck kids
i mean are you braindead or something