Moderator: Community Team
jonty125 wrote:Sorry, I meant killed by vig
jonty125 wrote:EBWOP: I had previously unvoted AoG, so I didn't find out about the don't lynch AoG decision, through being accused of skimming
evilchaos wrote:jonty125 wrote:I had previously unvoted AoG, so I didn't find out about the don't lynch AoG decision.
Obviously not "EBWOP", but I think we can all assume by the added text. Though seemingly harmless, it's still not okay.jonty125 wrote:EBWOP: I had previously unvoted AoG, so I didn't find out about the don't lynch AoG decision, through being accused of skimming
Victor Sullivan wrote:Vote Hank44Soccer, let's get this moving, so ol' Charizard can get some lovin'.
I'd FOS jonty for the edited post, but then again, I don't care as of yet
-Sully
. If AoG wasn't a vig target right now, I would definitely reccomend a shot aimed in your direction.
nagerous wrote:Wow, Freezie - voting Victor is really unproductive and has further raised my suspicions about you - what good would lynching Victor do
Mod, can we please have Hank prodded - he has been too silent this day phase.
DoomYoshi wrote:Professor Oaks infection was getting worse and worse. He probably (definitely) would have died tonight, but then he decided to mess with his records. Now, according to the Pokedex Charizards and Meowths are always wild.
Professor Oak, Town Cop Human has been modkilled.
Editing of posts is not acceptable. There was already one warning about this. Furthermore, you were poisoned anyway and due to die.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Mod Tip: DON'T REVEAL THIS!DoomYoshi wrote: Editing of posts is not acceptable. There was already one warning about this. Furthermore, you were poisoned anyway and due to die.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Well its a good thing you quoted this fir. Otherwise he could've just edited it out and we could've forgotten about it completely.Fircoal wrote:Mod Tip: DON'T REVEAL THIS!DoomYoshi wrote: Editing of posts is not acceptable. There was already one warning about this. Furthermore, you were poisoned anyway and due to die.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Why not? If the day had ended as normal, it would've been revealed then through flavour text tonight.Fircoal wrote:Mod Tip: DON'T REVEAL THIS!DoomYoshi wrote: Editing of posts is not acceptable. There was already one warning about this. Furthermore, you were poisoned anyway and due to die.
Actually from a gameplay setup it's extremely important. So I'm going to use this info anyway. However as a mod of mafia it doesn't make me pleased to see this revealed.Mr. Squirrel wrote:Well its a good thing you quoted this fir. Otherwise he could've just edited it out and we could've forgotten about it completely.Fircoal wrote:Mod Tip: DON'T REVEAL THIS!DoomYoshi wrote: Editing of posts is not acceptable. There was already one warning about this. Furthermore, you were poisoned anyway and due to die.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
I guess, but also it depends on how the flavour text is stated. If it's explicitly stated you're basically giving clues away to the town.DoomYoshi wrote:Why not? If the day had ended as normal, it would've been revealed then through flavour text tonight.Fircoal wrote:Mod Tip: DON'T REVEAL THIS!DoomYoshi wrote: Editing of posts is not acceptable. There was already one warning about this. Furthermore, you were poisoned anyway and due to die.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
It does depend on how it is stated, I agree. But if I had just put the first part (the minimal flavour text), followed by a modkill, the players wouldn't think that the poison actually was (or wasn't) a factor in the death. The cause of death was poison but I had no way to convey it without making it explicit. I suppose in future I will just have to leave it as the flavour and hope for the best but then town does LOSE information. Ideally, I will never again have to modkill someone so I hope this is a moot point.Fircoal wrote:I guess, but also it depends on how the flavour text is stated. If it's explicitly stated you're basically giving clues away to the town.DoomYoshi wrote:Why not? If the day had ended as normal, it would've been revealed then through flavour text tonight.Fircoal wrote:Mod Tip: DON'T REVEAL THIS!DoomYoshi wrote: Editing of posts is not acceptable. There was already one warning about this. Furthermore, you were poisoned anyway and due to die.
Can you at least share Jonty's N1 investigation result as he probably would have done if not modkilled (he was being pressured)?DoomYoshi wrote:It does depend on how it is stated, I agree. But if I had just put the first part (the minimal flavour text), followed by a modkill, the players wouldn't think that the poison actually was (or wasn't) a factor in the death. The cause of death was poison but I had no way to convey it without making it explicit. I suppose in future I will just have to leave it as the flavour and hope for the best but then town does LOSE information. Ideally, I will never again have to modkill someone so I hope this is a moot point.Fircoal wrote:I guess, but also it depends on how the flavour text is stated. If it's explicitly stated you're basically giving clues away to the town.DoomYoshi wrote:Why not? If the day had ended as normal, it would've been revealed then through flavour text tonight.Fircoal wrote:Mod Tip: DON'T REVEAL THIS!DoomYoshi wrote: Editing of posts is not acceptable. There was already one warning about this. Furthermore, you were poisoned anyway and due to die.
Definitely not. As a mod, he shouldn't. No one is sure what would have happened.Rodion wrote: Can you at least share Jonty's N1 investigation result as he probably would have done if not modkilled (he was being pressured)?
Typically, for modkills, you should make it as short and sweet as possible and reveal nothing else about any other player. A simple "Player X was struck by lightning and died" would have sufficed. Flavor text leads to discussion and different interpretations depending on how you would have worded the kill. If you blatantly come out and tell us there's a poisoner, then town is all the stronger at the poisoner's expense.DoomYoshi wrote:It does depend on how it is stated, I agree. But if I had just put the first part (the minimal flavour text), followed by a modkill, the players wouldn't think that the poison actually was (or wasn't) a factor in the death. The cause of death was poison but I had no way to convey it without making it explicit. I suppose in future I will just have to leave it as the flavour and hope for the best but then town does LOSE information. Ideally, I will never again have to modkill someone so I hope this is a moot point.
I agree. But oh well. All mods make mistakes sometimes. I just feel bad for the poisonerFircoal wrote:Actually from a gameplay setup it's extremely important. So I'm going to use this info anyway. However as a mod of mafia it doesn't make me pleased to see this revealed.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
) --- it's got SHIELDS!everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
No worries mate, we all learn from our first games - hope to see you in future onesjonty125 wrote:Sorry guys, thought I had made a new post, not edited.
