Conquer Club

Posted: **Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:55 pm**

maybe because you come on too strong. i knew the doc claimed, which was why i said it.

Posted: **Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:59 pm**

Really guys? Get in here and play.

Posted: **Sun Feb 19, 2012 1:45 am**

I'm really not seeing how edoc claiming is going to help at this point. I'm tending to think that either he IS a town power role or he's like a VT or something trying to get mafia fire. Neither of which is going to help town if we force him to claim. And the case doesn't bring up an obvious scumslip. Playstyle is more or less consistent with edoc's past play.

Posted: **Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:05 am**

I'm not sure I can see if we're gonna actually get anything done at this stage.

And I really doubt Edoc would be a VT trying to draw scum fire, considering he's been so open about his playing style of wanting to stay until the end to be a mvp...

Posted: **Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:49 am**

we have had enough people claim. We either vote someone for lynch or go no lynch. At this point everything is log jammed and I dont see any new info coming forth. Perhaps we would be baest served to see how the night plays out?

Posted: **Sun Feb 19, 2012 4:29 pm**

Leehar wrote:I'm not sure I can see if we're gonna actually get anything done at this stage.

And I really doubt Edoc would be a VT trying to draw scum fire, considering he's been so open about his playing style of wanting to stay until the end to be a mvp...

Glad to see you have me figured out so perfectly.

Iron Butterfly wrote:we have had enough people claim. We either vote someone for lynch or go no lynch. At this point everything is log jammed and I don't see any new info coming forth. Perhaps we would be best served to see how the night plays out?

Well this is scummy.

Still need more people to be posting to keep this going....

Posted: **Sun Feb 19, 2012 5:51 pm**

Vote Count
Leehar (1) - MoB Deadly
Edocsil (3) - name, jgordon1111, Leehar L-3
No Lynch (1) - shieldgenerator7
jgordon111 (1) - Iron Butterfly
Name (1) - edocsil

With 10 alive it takes 6 to lynch

Deadline is Friday, Feb 24th. Probably close to midnight EST.

The final prod of the day will be sent out Monday evening.

Posted: **Sun Feb 19, 2012 6:45 pm**

edocsil wrote:
Leehar wrote:I'm not sure I can see if we're gonna actually get anything done at this stage.

And I really doubt Edoc would be a VT trying to draw scum fire, considering he's been so open about his playing style of wanting to stay until the end to be a mvp...
Glad to see you have me figured out so perfectly.

Iron Butterfly wrote:we have had enough people claim. We either vote someone for lynch or go no lynch. At this point everything is log jammed and I don't see any new info coming forth. Perhaps we would be best served to see how the night plays out?
Well this is scummy.

Still need more people to be posting to keep this going....

Nothing Scummy at all. Either we lynch or no lynch. If we had no information and I suggested no lynch you may have a case to call it scummy. So far we have a claimed Doc, a claimed tree creature vig with a huge chip on his shoulders and you. We are at a huge impasse.

Just calling it as I see it.

Posted: **Sun Feb 19, 2012 8:21 pm**

It's day two and no one has the balls to hang anyone. You are giving it a nudge towards a NL that is not needed.

Posted: **Sun Feb 19, 2012 8:30 pm**

edocsil wrote:It's day two and no one has the balls to hang anyone. You are giving it a nudge towards a NL that is not needed.

One person cant hang anyone. It is done through consensus. I made my feelings known. The problem is we cant agree on who to hang.

Posted: **Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:06 pm**

Iron Butterfly wrote:
edocsil wrote:It's day two and no one has the balls to hang anyone. You are giving it a nudge towards a NL that is not needed.

One person cant hang anyone. It is done through consensus. I made my feelings known. The problem is we cant agree on who to hang.

Two or three people do the hanging. The rest just follow.

Posted: **Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:21 pm**

edocsil wrote:
Iron Butterfly wrote:
edocsil wrote:It's day two and no one has the balls to hang anyone. You are giving it a nudge towards a NL that is not needed.

One person cant hang anyone. It is done through consensus. I made my feelings known. The problem is we cant agree on who to hang.
Two or three people do the hanging. The rest just follow.

Edco dont get irate, remember thats what brought me to the point of being lynched,just chill day is not over 5 days to go actually.

As I said edoc you and BG have nothing to worry from me. That submariner dropped back out of sight again

Posted: **Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:48 pm**

jgordon1111 wrote:
edocsil wrote:
Iron Butterfly wrote:
edocsil wrote:It's day two and no one has the balls to hang anyone. You are giving it a nudge towards a NL that is not needed.

One person cant hang anyone. It is done through consensus. I made my feelings known. The problem is we cant agree on who to hang.
Two or three people do the hanging. The rest just follow.
Edco dont get irate, remember thats what brought me to the point of being lynched,just chill day is not over 5 days to go actually.

As I said edoc you and BG have nothing to worry from me. That submariner dropped back out of sight again

Ehh? Nothing to do with you at this point, nor am I irate.

Well that's a lie, but it a pretty small one. In the grand scheme of things I am only mildly annoyed. I absolutely hate losing games because no one wants to play.

Posted: **Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:05 pm**

you mistake me then, Edoc I love playing these games. And I think town has a damn good chance of winning this one. so if we go to a no lynch we need a plan. If we dont, we dont. But the submariners will have to be called out to do that.

Posted: **Sun Feb 19, 2012 11:08 pm**

jgordon1111 wrote:you mistake me then, Edoc I love playing these games. And I think town has a damn good chance of winning this one. so if we go to a no lynch we need a plan. If we dont, we dont. But the submariners will have to be called out to do that.

Which people specifically do you want to hear from? You can ask for prods from the mod.

edocsil wrote:
Iron Butterfly wrote:
edocsil wrote:It's day two and no one has the balls to hang anyone. You are giving it a nudge towards a NL that is not needed.

One person cant hang anyone. It is done through consensus. I made my feelings known. The problem is we cant agree on who to hang.
Two or three people do the hanging. The rest just follow.

I'm uncomfortable with forcing another claim (especially since the one closest to claiming is you) mainly because we've got a lot of information out there already and another claim could give mafia a lot of information.

Posted: **Sun Feb 19, 2012 11:13 pm**

safariguy5 wrote:
jgordon1111 wrote:you mistake me then, Edoc I love playing these games. And I think town has a damn good chance of winning this one. so if we go to a no lynch we need a plan. If we dont, we dont. But the submariners will have to be called out to do that.
Which people specifically do you want to hear from? You can ask for prods from the mod.

edocsil wrote:
Iron Butterfly wrote:
edocsil wrote:It's day two and no one has the balls to hang anyone. You are giving it a nudge towards a NL that is not needed.

One person cant hang anyone. It is done through consensus. I made my feelings known. The problem is we cant agree on who to hang.
Two or three people do the hanging. The rest just follow.
then why don't you put your money vote where your mouth is and vote no lynch?
I'm uncomfortable with forcing another claim (especially since the one closest to claiming is you) mainly because we've got a lot of information out there already and another claim could give mafia a lot of information.

Posted: **Sun Feb 19, 2012 11:25 pm**

shieldgenerator7 wrote:
safariguy5 wrote:
jgordon1111 wrote:you mistake me then, Edoc I love playing these games. And I think town has a damn good chance of winning this one. so if we go to a no lynch we need a plan. If we dont, we dont. But the submariners will have to be called out to do that.
Which people specifically do you want to hear from? You can ask for prods from the mod.

edocsil wrote:
Iron Butterfly wrote:
edocsil wrote:It's day two and no one has the balls to hang anyone. You are giving it a nudge towards a NL that is not needed.

One person cant hang anyone. It is done through consensus. I made my feelings known. The problem is we cant agree on who to hang.
Two or three people do the hanging. The rest just follow.
then why don't you put your money vote where your mouth is and vote no lynch?
I'm uncomfortable with forcing another claim (especially since the one closest to claiming is you) mainly because we've got a lot of information out there already and another claim could give mafia a lot of information.

Fine, Mr. Submariner.

unvote vote no lynch

Posted: **Mon Feb 20, 2012 1:32 am**

He did just kind of goad you into that Saf.

No big deal I guess in the long run. Still I will not vote NL out of principle D2.

Posted: **Mon Feb 20, 2012 2:14 am**

edocsil wrote:He did just kind of goad you into that Saf.

No big deal I guess in the long run. Still I will not vote NL out of principle D2.

Well I'm going to call it like it is. It's not the first time I've said it.

Besides, am I alone in asking "what the f*ck has shield done lately?"

Posted: **Mon Feb 20, 2012 2:51 am**

what has anyone done lately? we have three people on edocsil, who has brought nothing but quite a hard time for us with all the split decisions. if he was indeed scum, wouldnt that be what he wanted? to force us all into chaos and having no one close to being killed. if so, it worked.

Posted: **Mon Feb 20, 2012 9:48 am**

nàme wrote:what has anyone done lately? we have three people on edocsil, who has brought nothing but quite a hard time for us with all the split decisions. if he was indeed scum, wouldnt that be what he wanted? to force us all into chaos and having no one close to being killed. if so, it worked.

This is a conspiracy theory. Conspiracy theories... ah, yes. I know these quite well. I cook these up anytime I see something suspicious. I have a conspiracy theory about BG's claim, and it is a possibility. But it is unlikely, because conspiracies would require a lot of planning and there's too many things that could go wrong for conspiracies to actually work.... thus conspiracy theories (at least in this game) are just figments of our imagination. So I really doubt edoc was trying to cause chaos, because to plan that and have it work would rely on too many independent factors to come in and work according to plan, and they're not all cntrollable. But, I'm with you. I think about these things a lot despite their improbability.

-SG7 (

)

Posted: **Mon Feb 20, 2012 9:53 am**

UNVOTE Vote No lynch

Posted: **Mon Feb 20, 2012 12:14 pm**

nàme wrote:what has anyone done lately? we have three people on edocsil, who has brought nothing but quite a hard time for us with all the split decisions. if he was indeed scum, wouldnt that be what he wanted? to force us all into chaos and having no one close to being killed. if so, it worked.

Lol I have made 3 cases in three days because almost everyone else has desired to wait with thumbs lodged firmly in ass, waiting for night to come. If you want me to shut up and let someone else take lead on a case, then someone has to step up and do it.

Posted: **Mon Feb 20, 2012 12:38 pm**

edocsil wrote:
nàme wrote:what has anyone done lately? we have three people on edocsil, who has brought nothing but quite a hard time for us with all the split decisions. if he was indeed scum, wouldnt that be what he wanted? to force us all into chaos and having no one close to being killed. if so, it worked.
Lol I have made 3 cases in three days because almost everyone else has desired to wait with thumbs lodged firmly in ass, waiting for night to come. If you want me to shut up and let someone else take lead on a case, then someone has to step up and do it.

Posted: **Mon Feb 20, 2012 12:38 pm**

We would be lost without you.

Conquer Club

Rated M ENDGAME: Scene on Page 42

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence

Re: Rated M [10/12] Day 2: Silence