a tracks bshieldgenerator7 wrote:b is cleared if the person he tracks confirms he targeted who b says he targeted
a gets it right a is cleared
but b might have a role that allows him to visit so he could falsely say ya thats what i did
Moderator: Community Team
a tracks bshieldgenerator7 wrote:b is cleared if the person he tracks confirms he targeted who b says he targeted
If b lies for a then that means they're scum buddies and once we find out that a is not a tracker then b will be on the chopping block next. So I doubt that b would lie for a unless b thought a could easily get away with it.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:a tracks bshieldgenerator7 wrote:b is cleared if the person he tracks confirms he targeted who b says he targeted
a gets it right a is cleared
but b might have a role that allows him to visit so he could falsely say ya thats what i did
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Sorry / ... looked back, that was when I went away and I missed your posts. Wasn't ignoring you, in fact I thought you were just trying to jive me until I went back and checked. So, let's go with your/skill's plan./ wrote:This is exactly what I said day two, twice! And I even quoted myself two pages ago, how can you say you aren't ignoring me!?!?thehippo8 wrote:@skill ... well done with that logic puzzle. Sometimes the simplest solutions are the best!
...I will agree to this, go ahead and track me, but I still stand by my assessment that you should be vig killed tonight if shield is found not to be a killer by way of lynch, using a power and being sent to kill by the mafia are not mutually exclusive.
ok that works..sometimes i just get confusedshieldgenerator7 wrote:If b lies for a then that means they're scum buddies and once we find out that a is not a tracker then b will be on the chopping block next. So I doubt that b would lie for a unless b thought a could easily get away with it.Some7hingCLEVER wrote:a tracks bshieldgenerator7 wrote:b is cleared if the person he tracks confirms he targeted who b says he targeted
a gets it right a is cleared
but b might have a role that allows him to visit so he could falsely say ya thats what i did
I see your paying attention leehar,thank you.Leehar wrote:Did you suggest the same plan that / did tho Skill?

Seems I actually wasn't since reading back I see that / already mentioned it and skill already responded, as did Hippojgordon1111 wrote:I see your paying attention leehar,thank you.Leehar wrote:Did you suggest the same plan that / did tho Skill?


I would guess it's a man but the face wasn't very clear so it could really be either or.new guy1 wrote:I believe he said he was a tall man, not a woman. Therefore, so far it makes more sense for him to use a gun, if he is the wanderer.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
As you can see, I have to "discover an ancient power" which alludes to the fact I don't know what my role does. (wow I'm in Google chrome, which I don't usually use, and it has spell check! and I just corrected "alludes" because it was redunderlined. How cool is that?) It also says I could be good or evil which alludes to the fact I don't know my alignment. I have to go now, more later.D&D wrote:Wanderers are a rare breed. Few creatures are willing to walk the world for months or years at a time, perhaps with companions, but never with a home, never with more possessions than they can carry. Those who can, however, discover a ancient power easily harnessed and overwhelming in scale. ...
Wanderers, by their nature, can be of any alignment. Good wanderers have a tendency to show up exactly when needed - a savior silhouetted on the horizon. Evil wanderers are as destructive as they are random; more a force of nature than anything else.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.

But he claimed a name, which is weird if it's a totally different character.jgordon1111 wrote:By his description of his role and how he looks the only character I found besides the peguin which he says no to, is tuxedo mask from sailor moon.
And tuxedo mask does not use a gun he uses his cane and has amnesia,but can only remeber parts of his life around sailor moon. And turns into tuxedo mask when she is in danger.
Now like I said if it was that easy for me to find (in ten minutes) with a general description he gave,why hasnt he looked into it himself,or defended himself other than to say I am innocent but dont know who I am or what my role does.

Logically the killer must be shield or hippo, so we should lynch one of the two so we know with no uncertainty.Leehar wrote:@/: He did just say pretty clearly that he was A wanderer and from D&D, so I doubt thats it.
fastposted, cool beans.
Doesn't seem anything to suggest scum, so I'd suggest unvoting for now?
Unless there's a deadline?

I believe betiko himself prearranged for hippo and / to track him.Leehar wrote:I'm still uncertain on the whole what did ng see happen on betiko, and what the deal with on what to do last night was that prompted hippo to target betiko?
And neither am I sure on whether the tracking solution mentioned is really feasible and worth doing, so I really have to again vote Hippo.
Tho I am now thinking that lynching both ends that hippo is stuck on would be more beneficial (sg7 or /) ie if we lynch sg7 and he comes up guilty, then odds are that hippo is safe and / is scum. Or if we lynch / and he comes up safe, then hippo should be scum and sg7 safe; if he comes up guilty, then sg7 is guilty and hippo is safe?
But If hippo comes up safe, then both sg7 and / should/could theoretically be scum.
I'm inclined to hippo because it's too many coincidences with being counterclaimed, and being caught with hands in the cookie-jar on betiko.
However, the above is only reliable if ng1 really did see only Sg7 and hippo on betiko? So did you newguy?
fastposted x3


everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.