Conquer Club

MountainLion wrote:Iceman's in Alaska? I was there two weeks ago.

Hence the name AK_Iceman

Anarkistsdream wrote:Mandy, how did Wicked vote for herself?

My bad. I allways confuse Wicked and Syzygy.

VOTE COUNT

Wicked(6) - MM, jnd, AK, Serbia, Exile, Syzygy
Kwanton(1) - XenC
AK Iceman(13) - Wicked, Fircoal, Aimless, LSU, Skittles, Neutrino, Aegnor, Talapus, Nagerus, Kwanton, Koesen, Ga7, Firth
Minister Masket(1) - Tonka,
Life-saver(0) -
Jnd(0) -
Freezie(0)
Fircoal (1) - Life-saver,
Nagerus (0) -
Aegnor (1) - Pancake
Exile(0) -
Ga7(0)
LSU(1) - Skoffin
Pancake(1) - Moz
Aimless(0) -
Talapus(0)
Mauntain Lion(0)
Anarkistsdream(2) - Trestain, Freezie

It takes 16 votes to lynch.

wicked wrote:
FOS Freezie for pretty much demanding I quote my role PM even after I warned it could give the scum more power. Mandy said in this game quoting PM's would only help the scum, so perhaps this is all some elaborate ploy to get said info by sacrificing IC.

It was that or I would have beleived AK's claim. I am almost 100% sure there is a doc left in this, so role-claiming isn't THAT dangerous right now. I wanted to be sure of your case before you get hammered if you were indeed what you were claiming.

That's it.

Also, AK, you might aswell do your role-claim like wicked aswell.


Thought it won't matter much..

freezie wrote:

wicked wrote:
FOS Freezie for pretty much demanding I quote my role PM even after I warned it could give the scum more power. Mandy said in this game quoting PM's would only help the scum, so perhaps this is all some elaborate ploy to get said info by sacrificing IC.

It was that or I would have beleived AK's claim. I am almost 100% sure there is a doc left in this, so role-claiming isn't THAT dangerous right now. I wanted to be sure of your case before you get hammered if you were indeed what you were claiming.

That's it.

Funny then how you put your vote back on me b/c I didn't want to divulge sensitive information that could help the scum No worries now, but it's worthy of a FOS and keeping a close eye on you.

Heh, sorry for not posting earlier. I posted my investigation last night, then headed off to work. That post I made previously about the "dog eating my post" happened at 1:30am and I was too tired to retype. Can't anyone figure out Alaska time?

I'll start reconstructing it now...

Unvote

Just to be sure you get the time to finish your reconstruction. It had better be good though

Don't worry, I have today off from work and I'll finish it in awhile.

wicked wrote:...I am not involved in the duel, as I've already stated. ..

Unvote for now. First off I want to see AK's post and secondly, I just went back and re-read the thread - where the hell did you say that?

Quick off-topic question for Iceman: where do you live in Alaska? I have a good friend that lives in Anchorage, and I've visited him there twice...once was just two weeks ago.

Palmer. About 45 miles north of Anchorage.

I'd like to wait to see what AK has to say before we lynch him, so unvote for now.

That said, I'd want to pose a couple of questions for AK:

First, so long as it isn't going to help the Yuuzhan Vong, can you post your role information? (Or, if it will help the Yuuzhan Vong, can you post those portions that are safe?)

Second, now that you've used your ability and given us a scum, you are just a vanilla townie, right? So, considering wicked's roleclaim and the possibility that you are wrong, is there any reason that we shouldn't confirm your claim by lynching you before we take out wicked? Is there any way you can prove your claim to us?

Normally, if you had just claimed cop, I would have taken your claim at face value and lynched wicked as a test. However, in this one specific instance, it seems like the loss of your claimed role is not a substantial blow to the town, whereas the loss of wicked's claimed role is; thus, the safest test is to lynch you first.

Which isn't to say that I particularly think that you are lying - as I said before, my natural instinct here is to take your claim at face value - merely that the best worst case scenario here involves lynching you first.

AK's claim of one shot investigation is a little far fetched, but I'm willing to wait for this post of his.

Unvote

Do bear in mind how easy it is to impersonate a role.

Minister Masket wrote:Do bear in mind how easy it is to impersonate a role.

You win today's Master of the Obvious Award!

Meh. unvote vote IC

no need for everyone to unvote him, as you're just going to have to revote and he's not that close to lynch now.

wicked wrote:no need for everyone to unvote him, as you're just going to have to revote.

Little pushy aren't we Wicked?

who ME??????????!?!?!??!?!? NEVAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!
just trying to save Mandy some work, as he's obviously lazy by not removing the zero votes.

BTW, IC's had at least 2 days to come up with a fake claim... should be a doozy! Let the show begin!

I think a fake claim isn't going to do it for him anymore. My vote on him is based on the assumption that even if he is speaking the truth, it's safer to lynch him now than you, though I actually am more suspicious of you than of him.

Tick Tock, Iceman!

This had better be good, for as long as we've got to wait!

I keep peeking over from my other desktop to see if he's yarning his tall tale yet.