Page 1946 of 2711
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:43 am
by targetman377
strike wolf wrote:targetman377 wrote:strike wolf wrote:So did Jackson. In fact,Jckson took side tours to fight the Spanish in Florida while he was fighting the British. Not to mention he even challenged his own troops.
And lets not forget that Teddy Roosevelt once gve an hour and a half long speech with a bullet freshly lodged into his chest.
jackson fought one battle at new orleans come on thats a joke. got luckie and spain did not really try to defend flordia at all and the native amercians thats not even a challange when you have guns and they have bow and arrows.
washington held our country together avoided a war with france. bet enland with really no good army when british poored all they could to keep us british. come on not to mention he fought france and native americans. while is was with the british in the middle of the forest
It's not always the difficulty. it's the style.
George Washington doesn't ern as many style points in my book. Plus he stood up against his entire army under his control when they were about to go back to Tennessee by himself (Jackson)
washington had 20,000 men half desarted him and he still managed to pull of a win how is that not bad ass?
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 12:39 pm
by DAZMCFC
targetman377 wrote:well Washington took on the BRITISH EMPIRE!!!!
it wasn't exactly the British Empire. just our troops over the pond. we still had troops all over the world.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 12:48 pm
by muy_thaiguy
targetman377 wrote:strike wolf wrote:So did Jackson. In fact,Jckson took side tours to fight the Spanish in Florida while he was fighting the British. Not to mention he even challenged his own troops.
And lets not forget that Teddy Roosevelt once gve an hour and a half long speech with a bullet freshly lodged into his chest.
jackson fought one battle at new orleans come on thats a joke. got luckie and spain did not really try to defend flordia at all and the native amercians thats not even a challange when you have guns and they have bow and arrows.
washington held our country together avoided a war with france. bet enland with really no good army when british poored all they could to keep us british. come on not to mention he fought france and native americans. while is was with the british in the middle of the forest
Jackson fought the Battle of New Orleans with 2000 men. Only a handful (maybe a dozen or so) were actual soldiers. The British had around 10,000 veteran soldiers. One battle, but Jackson won it brilliantly.
Oh, and the natives did have firearms. Along with bows and arrows (which have a much higher rate of fire then any musket).
And Washington, other then the one French lordling, and near the end of the war, and really nothing to do with the French since the French and Indian War.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 2:38 pm
by strike wolf
diddle wrote:muy_thaiguy wrote:Army of GOD wrote:muy_thaiguy wrote:
Mayonnaise...
a lot of people here.
Well...
F*** YOU ALL!
I only recently came round to the wonders of mayonnaise. Before then I only used it as an innuendo.[/quote]
Mayonnaise. keeping the blck man down since undercover brother.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 2:39 pm
by strike wolf
targetman377 wrote:strike wolf wrote:targetman377 wrote:strike wolf wrote:So did Jackson. In fact,Jckson took side tours to fight the Spanish in Florida while he was fighting the British. Not to mention he even challenged his own troops.
And lets not forget that Teddy Roosevelt once gve an hour and a half long speech with a bullet freshly lodged into his chest.
jackson fought one battle at new orleans come on thats a joke. got luckie and spain did not really try to defend flordia at all and the native amercians thats not even a challange when you have guns and they have bow and arrows.
washington held our country together avoided a war with france. bet enland with really no good army when british poored all they could to keep us british. come on not to mention he fought france and native americans. while is was with the british in the middle of the forest
It's not always the difficulty. it's the style.
George Washington doesn't ern as many style points in my book. Plus he stood up against his entire army under his control when they were about to go back to Tennessee by himself (Jackson)
washington had 20,000 men half desarted him and he still managed to pull of a win how is that not bad ass?
He was helped by the french, a guy who would later turn against the country, a strategist because he had no strategy and his men hd to be whipped into shape by yet another guy.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 3:56 pm
by AndyDufresne
Ape/Monkey overlordship should be the way all countries are run. **Eats a banana**
--Andy
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 5:14 pm
by Army of GOD
Zachary Taylor FTW!
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 5:22 pm
by targetman377
DAZMCFC wrote:targetman377 wrote:well Washington took on the BRITISH EMPIRE!!!!
it wasn't exactly the British Empire. just our troops over the pond. we still had troops all over the world.
over the pond did you just call the atlanitic a pond lol
no but washington was ba
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 5:24 pm
by targetman377
muy_thaiguy wrote:targetman377 wrote:strike wolf wrote:So did Jackson. In fact,Jckson took side tours to fight the Spanish in Florida while he was fighting the British. Not to mention he even challenged his own troops.
And lets not forget that Teddy Roosevelt once gve an hour and a half long speech with a bullet freshly lodged into his chest.
jackson fought one battle at new orleans come on thats a joke. got luckie and spain did not really try to defend flordia at all and the native amercians thats not even a challange when you have guns and they have bow and arrows.
washington held our country together avoided a war with france. bet enland with really no good army when british poored all they could to keep us british. come on not to mention he fought france and native americans. while is was with the british in the middle of the forest
Jackson fought the Battle of New Orleans with 2000 men. Only a handful (maybe a dozen or so) were actual soldiers. The British had around 10,000 veteran soldiers. One battle, but Jackson won it brilliantly.
Oh, and the natives did have firearms. Along with bows and arrows (which have a much higher rate of fire then any musket).
And Washington, other then the one French lordling, and near the end of the war, and really nothing to do with the French since the French and Indian War.
wet washington had a whole army of soldiers with no formal training on top of that no shoes, no canonans until they where captured. and as for the french part i was refering to the french and indian war
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 5:27 pm
by targetman377
strike wolf wrote:targetman377 wrote:strike wolf wrote:targetman377 wrote:
jackson fought one battle at new orleans come on thats a joke. got luckie and spain did not really try to defend flordia at all and the native amercians thats not even a challange when you have guns and they have bow and arrows.
washington held our country together avoided a war with france. bet enland with really no good army when british poored all they could to keep us british. come on not to mention he fought france and native americans. while is was with the british in the middle of the forest
It's not always the difficulty. it's the style.
George Washington doesn't ern as many style points in my book. Plus he stood up against his entire army under his control when they were about to go back to Tennessee by himself (Jackson)
washington had 20,000 men half desarted him and he still managed to pull of a win how is that not bad ass?
He was helped by the french, a guy who would later turn against the country, a strategist because he had no strategy and his men hd to be whipped into shape by yet another guy.
really yet it was washington who would turn the tied of the war by his deminare and his desisions. at a 6 mounth period congress granted washington full power of the united states meaning he was a dictator.. and he gave that up all that power.
the french did very little besides keep the british at yorktown with there navy
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 9:23 pm
by Quirk
celebrate the holiday season with a Banana Beast
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 9:42 pm
by Army of GOD
Quirk wrote:celebrate the holiday season with a Banana Beast
They're eating his brains!! =O =O =O
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 10:08 pm
by strike wolf
AndyDufresne wrote:Ape/Monkey overlordship should be the way all countries are run. **Eats a banana**
--Andy
I think Mr. Heston would disagree. blessed hygienic apes
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 10:09 pm
by strike wolf
Army of GOD wrote:Zachary Taylor FTW!
i'll politely disagree. you outgoing genius.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 10:11 pm
by strike wolf
targetman377 wrote:DAZMCFC wrote:targetman377 wrote:well Washington took on the BRITISH EMPIRE!!!!
it wasn't exactly the British Empire. just our troops over the pond. we still had troops all over the world.
over the pond did you just call the atlanitic a pond lol
no but washington was ba
You've never heard that expression before?
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 10:14 pm
by Quirk
Mrs. Quirk had a night out tonight. So I drank wine and watched the Hawks lose to the Cavaliers.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 10:16 pm
by Quirk
strike wolf wrote:targetman377 wrote:DAZMCFC wrote:targetman377 wrote:well Washington took on the BRITISH EMPIRE!!!!
it wasn't exactly the British Empire. just our troops over the pond. we still had troops all over the world.
over the pond did you just call the atlanitic a pond lol
no but washington was ba
You've never heard that expression before?
I was surprised, too.
C'mon target
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 10:21 pm
by Army of GOD
Quirk wrote:Mrs. Quirk had a night out tonight. So I drank wine and watched the Hawks lose to the Cavaliers.
Raptors>both of those teams
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 10:38 pm
by Quirk
As 2009 comes to an end I feel the best effort I could give to the longest thread thread is to re-post some of my favorite pics from the past year. Because talking about the year would just get depressing. Except for Quirk Jr, of course. I feel like the hardships of 2009 prepared me for whatever 2010 can throw at me.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 10:43 pm
by Quirk
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:30 pm
by autoload
strike wolf wrote:targetman377 wrote:strike wolf wrote:targetman377 wrote:strike wolf wrote:He almost fell victim to spinach deprivation after the salmonella scare.
ohhh dear!!!!!!
Thankfully he was ble to get by on sweet peas and olive oil.
wow i could not live on that diet
Yeah olive oil has no meat...
And sweet pea has baby fat.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:33 pm
by autoload
Backlog complete.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:34 pm
by autoload
I'm out.
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 12:31 am
by Quirk
Re: the longest thread, thread - Occasionally NSFW
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:22 am
by strike wolf
targetman377 wrote:strike wolf wrote:targetman377 wrote:strike wolf wrote:
It's not always the difficulty. it's the style.
George Washington doesn't ern as many style points in my book. Plus he stood up against his entire army under his control when they were about to go back to Tennessee by himself (Jackson)
washington had 20,000 men half desarted him and he still managed to pull of a win how is that not bad ass?
He was helped by the french, a guy who would later turn against the country, a strategist because he had no strategy and his men hd to be whipped into shape by yet another guy.
I'm really seeing the fairness in target's sttements.
really yet it was washington who would turn the tied of the war by his deminare and his desisions. at a 6 mounth period congress granted washington full power of the united states meaning he was a dictator.. and he gave that up all that power.
the french did very little besides keep the british at yorktown with there navy
