lol, Bush fans

kclborat · Post by **kclborat** » Tue Jan 23, 2007 11:13 pm

Jay, im surprised that I agree with you on anything, but I agree with you about NAFTA. However, i disagree with every single other statement you have made. How can you blame the "liberal media" for everything? "They have a massive plot to undermine our conservative president and kill our country". AWHA?!

cowshrptrn · Post by **cowshrptrn** » Tue Jan 23, 2007 11:16 pm

The fact that you can go on and on about the liberal media when theres Fox News with Bill O'Reilly who does nothing but badmouth liberals while claiming to be neutral shows how out of touch you are with the rest of the world and how easily you swallow this bullshit.

jay_a2j · Post by **jay_a2j** » Wed Jan 24, 2007 3:39 am

reverend_kyle wrote:Cojones came from a foreign word you dumbass.

As do MOST words idiot. :roll:

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Wed Jan 24, 2007 3:55 am

jay_a2j wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:Cojones came from a foreign word you dumbass.

As do MOST words idiot.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cojones

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kahuna

there is why you are an idiot, oh and btw, spell check is english unless you have it set otherwise.

mandalorian2298 · Post by **mandalorian2298** » Wed Jan 24, 2007 5:10 am

DIRESTRAITS wrote:how has Bush made terrorists attacks more likely?

By ordering them? I mean isn't it a BIT suspicius to you how Al Quaida threats allways come when Bush is loosing support. Remember during the last ellections, when Bushes popularity sliped, there came the tape of Osama (who is an ex(?)-CIA cooperant) threatening Americans if they vote for Bush. Now, when everyone (sane) in USA, including a good part of the Republican Party, is against sending adittional troops to Iraq; NOW Al Quaida feels the need to send another taunting and treathening tape.

It all reminds me how we used to manipulate dumb kids, back in pre-school. :twisted:

I just hope at least those kids became a little smarter [-o<

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Wed Jan 24, 2007 9:23 am

kclborat wrote:Jay, im surprised that I agree with you on anything, but I agree with you about NAFTA.

I agree, free trade is awful for our country.

khazalid · Post by **khazalid** » Wed Jan 24, 2007 9:32 am

its startling how pathetically stupid you guys are. im half expecting this thread to be locked to anyone above 600 points

Mirak · Post by **Mirak** » Wed Jan 24, 2007 11:15 am

khazalid wrote:its startling how pathetically stupid you guys are. im half expecting this thread to be locked to anyone above 600 points

You'll get used to it after some time...

BTW I was born in Brighton

vtmarik · Post by **vtmarik** » Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:24 pm

mandalorian2298 wrote:
DIRESTRAITS wrote:how has Bush made terrorists attacks more likely?

By ordering them? I mean isn't it a BIT suspicius to you how Al Quaida threats allways come when Bush is loosing support. Remember during the last ellections, when Bushes popularity sliped, there came the tape of Osama (who is an ex(?)-CIA cooperant) threatening Americans if they vote for Bush. Now, when everyone (sane) in USA, including a good part of the Republican Party, is against sending adittional troops to Iraq; NOW Al Quaida feels the need to send another taunting and treathening tape.

It all reminds me how we used to manipulate dumb kids, back in pre-school. I just hope at least those kids became a little smarter

The only part of that particular conspiracy theory I like is that Osama Bin Laden was paid by our government for shooting down drug traffickers planes are part of our ineffective war on drugs.

It can be argued that the war on drugs caused (or at least contributed to) the war on terror, because Osama used the money from the anti-drug operations to fund the 1993 WTC bombing and 9/11

Knight of Orient · Post by **Knight of Orient** » Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:15 pm

vtmarik wrote:
mandalorian2298 wrote:
DIRESTRAITS wrote:how has Bush made terrorists attacks more likely?

By ordering them? I mean isn't it a BIT suspicius to you how Al Quaida threats allways come when Bush is loosing support. Remember during the last ellections, when Bushes popularity sliped, there came the tape of Osama (who is an ex(?)-CIA cooperant) threatening Americans if they vote for Bush. Now, when everyone (sane) in USA, including a good part of the Republican Party, is against sending adittional troops to Iraq; NOW Al Quaida feels the need to send another taunting and treathening tape.

It all reminds me how we used to manipulate dumb kids, back in pre-school. I just hope at least those kids became a little smarter

The only part of that particular conspiracy theory I like is that Osama Bin Laden was paid by our government for shooting down drug traffickers planes are part of our ineffective war on drugs.

It can be argued that the war on drugs caused (or at least contributed to) the war on terror, because Osama used the money from the anti-drug operations to fund the 1993 WTC bombing and 9/11

So, Osama doesnt want Bush in office.....it makes me ponder....why does half of america agree? maybe the mongoose(bush) was uncaged on the cobra(osama)in the last2 elections, anyone ever thought of that? I think we all should think on this 4 a bit.

mandalorian2298 · Post by **mandalorian2298** » Wed Jan 24, 2007 3:53 pm

Knight of Orient wrote:
vtmarik wrote:
mandalorian2298 wrote:
DIRESTRAITS wrote:how has Bush made terrorists attacks more likely?

By ordering them? I mean isn't it a BIT suspicius to you how Al Quaida threats allways come when Bush is loosing support. Remember during the last ellections, when Bushes popularity sliped, there came the tape of Osama (who is an ex(?)-CIA cooperant) threatening Americans if they vote for Bush. Now, when everyone (sane) in USA, including a good part of the Republican Party, is against sending adittional troops to Iraq; NOW Al Quaida feels the need to send another taunting and treathening tape.

It all reminds me how we used to manipulate dumb kids, back in pre-school. I just hope at least those kids became a little smarter

The only part of that particular conspiracy theory I like is that Osama Bin Laden was paid by our government for shooting down drug traffickers planes are part of our ineffective war on drugs.

It can be argued that the war on drugs caused (or at least contributed to) the war on terror, because Osama used the money from the anti-drug operations to fund the 1993 WTC bombing and 9/11

So, Osama doesnt want Bush in office.....it makes me ponder....why does half of america agree? maybe the mongoose(bush) was uncaged on the cobra(osama)in the last2 elections, anyone ever thought of that? I think we all should think on this 4 a bit.

Your mongooses Inteligence :lol:

Agency paid Osama to fight for them before. Now he is the only trump Bush has left (seriusly, with Al Quaida out of the picture, there would be no reason for ANYONE to vote for the mongoose). Osama is THE ONLY true supporter that Bush has left. Had Osama not wanted Bush reelected, he wouldn't have sent that mesage in the midle of the election race in wich Bush's sole argument was: "Osama is still out there and he is a threat to the American people, whom only I can stop." For the sake of sanity why can't the people on this "strategy adoring" site just realize the effect of EVERY Al Quaida action, so far, has been: giving Bush an argument to continue his "War on Oil-being.-in-possesion-of people-who-aren't-my-partners/friends/donators" ](*,)