Ba-dum, Crash!jrl332005 wrote:Getting a little squirrely there?
Moderator: Community Team
Ba-dum, Crash!jrl332005 wrote:Getting a little squirrely there?
Mr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.

Defensive against what? lolMr. Squirrel wrote:vote age for being defensive. Obvious scum. case closed.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Vote safariguy5 for being the first person to vote me, in my first ever mafia game!safariguy5 wrote:Hm, I see some players here who I haven't played mafia with before (Aage, jrl, Foxglove). Should be interesting.
Vote Foxglove
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Aha! textbook OMGUS vote!Foxglove wrote:Vote safariguy5 for being the first person to vote me, in my first ever mafia game!safariguy5 wrote:Hm, I see some players here who I haven't played mafia with before (Aage, jrl, Foxglove). Should be interesting.
Vote Foxglove

saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Woah there, they are cool shades!colton24 wrote:Vote duday for wearing shades
lalaland wrote:This is what I love about Spamalot... you click on a title to a thread, and you have no idea what you'll find inside...
Mr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
Five free points for complimenting the mod, vote tally will be here in a sec.duday53 wrote:
Well done mod.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Your accusation seems like a very flimsy reason for a serious vote. Although he did start an unnecessary bandwagon, he unvoted by the time you placed your vote. Rather than attack his vote switching (which is quite common this early in the game, but a scumtell nonetheless) you focus on his actions that he already corrected. Its a strange thing. I dont think this makes you any scummier, just not quite as effective in your arguing.colton24 wrote:Unvote, vote jrl332005 for starting a bandwagon with random votes going around.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
We have to take the person in question into consideration here Squirrel. This is colton we're talking about, and scummy voting is something he's known for. It's always been easy to default vote colton when we have nothing else. I would be cautious about jumping on him so early.Mr. Squirrel wrote:Your accusation seems like a very flimsy reason for a serious vote. Although he did start an unnecessary bandwagon, he unvoted by the time you placed your vote. Rather than attack his vote switching (which is quite common this early in the game, but a scumtell nonetheless) you focus on his actions that he already corrected. Its a strange thing. I dont think this makes you any scummier, just not quite as effective in your arguing.colton24 wrote:Unvote, vote jrl332005 for starting a bandwagon with random votes going around.

lol ok. I have only played one game with him (as far as I remember) and that was before my little hiatus. I thought maybe he would have gotten a little more experience in that time.safariguy5 wrote:Man, this is why I kinda like a Night 0 for any investigative and nonkilling roles. Day 1 blind like this is hard to get a lynch because everyone is blank.We have to take the person in question into consideration here Squirrel. This is colton we're talking about, and scummy voting is something he's known for. It's always been easy to default vote colton when we have nothing else. I would be cautious about jumping on him so early.Mr. Squirrel wrote:Your accusation seems like a very flimsy reason for a serious vote. Although he did start an unnecessary bandwagon, he unvoted by the time you placed your vote. Rather than attack his vote switching (which is quite common this early in the game, but a scumtell nonetheless) you focus on his actions that he already corrected. Its a strange thing. I dont think this makes you any scummier, just not quite as effective in your arguing.colton24 wrote:Unvote, vote jrl332005 for starting a bandwagon with random votes going around.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
that doesnt sound like the squirrel we know, does he allways put that much thought in-to a post?Mr. Squirrel wrote:Your accusation seems like a very flimsy reason for a serious vote. Although he did start an unnecessary bandwagon, he unvoted by the time you placed your vote. Rather than attack his vote switching (which is quite common this early in the game, but a scumtell nonetheless) you focus on his actions that he already corrected. Its a strange thing. I dont think this makes you any scummier, just not quite as effective in your arguing.colton24 wrote:Unvote, vote jrl332005 for starting a bandwagon with random votes going around.
what are you talking about wercool? Mr. Squirrel was one of the regulars back when mafia was big on this forum. And why would you vote and unvote in the same post? You trying to prove a point? Or maybe you're trying to ridicule a legitimate analysis?wercool wrote:VOTE COLTON okthat doesnt sound like the squirrel we know, does he allways put that much thought in-to a post?Mr. Squirrel wrote:Your accusation seems like a very flimsy reason for a serious vote. Although he did start an unnecessary bandwagon, he unvoted by the time you placed your vote. Rather than attack his vote switching (which is quite common this early in the game, but a scumtell nonetheless) you focus on his actions that he already corrected. Its a strange thing. I dont think this makes you any scummier, just not quite as effective in your arguing.colton24 wrote:Unvote, vote jrl332005 for starting a bandwagon with random votes going around.
unvote

That can't be right, unless I've got some funky powers I don't know about. I also distinctly recall unvoting.edocsil wrote:Here they are, VOTES
Aage (1) ~~~ Naxus
Colton24 (2) ~~~ Aage, Duday53
Foxglove (1) ~~~ Safariguy5
Safariguy5 (2) ~~~ MeDeFe, Foxglove
Naxus (1) ~~~ Cena-rules
Jrl332005 (2) ~~~ MeDeFe, Colton24
I think my pattern for these Vote tallies will be one per page, keeps it simple for all of us.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Actually, it used to be even bigger before I got here. I just got to see the last of the regulars fade away.safariguy5 wrote: what are you talking about wercool? Mr. Squirrel was one of the regulars back when mafia was big on this forum.
I don't understand this. I might make some funny posts occasionally, but when I'm interested in a mafia I normally provide as much analysis as I can. Do you disagree?wercool wrote: that doesnt sound like the squirrel we know, does he allways put that much thought in-to a post?
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
MeDeFe wrote:That can't be right, unless I've got some funky powers I don't know about. I also distinctly recall unvoting.edocsil wrote:Here they are, VOTES
Aage (1) ~~~ Naxus
Colton24 (2) ~~~ Aage, Duday53
Foxglove (1) ~~~ Safariguy5
Safariguy5 (2) ~~~ MeDeFe, Foxglove
Naxus (1) ~~~ Cena-rules
Jrl332005 (2) ~~~ MeDeFe, Colton24
I think my pattern for these Vote tallies will be one per page, keeps it simple for all of us.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
i dont know, i havent played that many games with you and i didnt think you would post that much analysis on day 1.Mr. Squirrel wrote:Actually, it used to be even bigger before I got here. I just got to see the last of the regulars fade away.safariguy5 wrote: what are you talking about wercool? Mr. Squirrel was one of the regulars back when mafia was big on this forum.I don't understand this. I might make some funny posts occasionally, but when I'm interested in a mafia I normally provide as much analysis as I can. Do you disagree?wercool wrote: that doesnt sound like the squirrel we know, does he allways put that much thought in-to a post?