Page 3 of 3
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 2:49 am
by Jesse, Bad Boy
b.k. barunt wrote:If what you say is true, that "it will eventually reach equilibrium", then you have just disproved an immutable law, i.e. the second law of thermodynamics, which clearly states that life within the system will continue to become more disorganized. What's next on your list, the law of gravity? And Jesse you say that "there are no closed systems", when even your fellow evolutionists regard the solar system as closed insofar as the law of entropy is concerned.
Which fellow evolutionists?
And how did you learn about entropy? From a website spouting creationist bullshit? I honestly suggest you go back and read that link I gave you just now, as it gives the best explanation thus far, better and more concise than I can hope to give.
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 2:50 am
by b.k. barunt
I quoted from it. I'm not about to follow your lead and reprint half of it. Where did i learn? I studied it in college.
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 2:51 am
by Jesse, Bad Boy
b.k. barunt wrote: And since when does a person's being an expert in his or her field guarantee their honesty? Maybe you've never heard of the piltdown man hoax?
I am aware of the hoax, but I didn't state that they had one hundred percent authority. Rather instead, I said that I
highly doubt that they would warp their own science. Don't try and put words in my mouth, jerk off.
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 2:52 am
by Jesse, Bad Boy
b.k. barunt wrote:I quoted from it. I'm not about to follow your lead and reprint half of it.
You just quoted from the above link I gave you?
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/thermo/entropy.html
What did you quote?
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 2:54 am
by Jesse, Bad Boy
b.k. barunt wrote:I quoted from it. I'm not about to follow your lead and reprint half of it. Where did i learn? I studied it in college.
Which college, and which professor? Perhaps I need to have a few of my old colleagues refresh his/her memory on how Thermodynamics functions.
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 2:54 am
by b.k. barunt
And here we reach the point where you start feeling inadequate and throwing insults. Are you that insecure? Well you can abuse yourself now, by yourself.
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 2:56 am
by Jesse, Bad Boy
b.k. barunt wrote:And here we reach the point where you start feeling inadequate and throwing insults. Are you that insecure? Well you can abuse yourself now, by yourself.
Whatever.
It's people like you
who don't know what they are talking about that piss me off. That, and when people strawman my words and views. Nothing angers me more then when some sneaky jerk off tries to warp a totally legitimate view with childish wordplay so that it appears as if the view is totally irrational or wrong.
Evolution is a sound theory, and your warped understanding of thermodynamics only goes to show that you're not interested in facts, but rather instead your own safe (albeit, totally wrong) views.
Or is this a concession that thermodynamics has little to do with evolution? It takes a bigger man to admit when he is wrong.
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 3:31 am
by littlechubb
So b.k. barunt if you are so against the evolutionist theories, what is it that you believe in, and please use cited sources,
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 3:44 am
by Jesse, Bad Boy
littlechubb wrote:So b.k. barunt if you are so against the evolutionist theories, what is it that you believe in, and please use cited sources,
The only sources which would support his claims are sites that are solely focused on twisting the truth.
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 1:14 pm
by littlechubb
will see jesse, seems like he just likes to cut other peoples beliefs down because hes struggleing in his own, unless actually wants to share his beliefs and give some sources to them?