Moderator: Clan Directors

Nice term, but yes that is what I had to do before.Rodion wrote:If you want to rank clans against divisions, you need to create several "Frankensteins" for it to work.
Equally strong == equal (to me at least). I was just confused of you adding "stronger" and "weaker" because those adjectives presume you are comparing them to something else. Just my misunderstanding.josko.ri wrote:equally strong (or) weak. means that noone Division were stronger than any onther Division. true or false?

But that was pretty much what was roughly done when Jpc drafted the divisions. I don't remember his process exactly but he did seed all the clans and divide them equally along the divisions. You're pretty much commenting on strengths after the fact, but that does wring somewhat hollow. Again there also all the other incremental factors like how much 18 game sets can truly count etcjosko.ri wrote:I wanted to say, that no matter in which Division someone played, it is important which clans they played with. as this system of calculation validate all historical data of all clans, then CL3 results should be validated according to clans faced and their ranking in moment when match was done, and it would be very unfair to just give 55 (wins achieved) vs 45 (average wins in Division) because some Divisions are weaker and some are stronger. numbers and rankings(from previous wars) of clans from particular Division will show which clans were weaker/stronger and therefore validate performance of a clan according to strenght of opponent's clan, not according to average number of wins in a Division.
it has decay factor, what is (if I realized good) parameter of2 variables (time passed and strength of opponent), and I totally support that system.Leehar wrote:But that was pretty much what was roughly done when Jpc drafted the divisions. I don't remember his process exactly but he did seed all the clans and divide them equally along the divisions. You're pretty much commenting on strengths after the fact, but that does wring somewhat hollow. Again there also all the other incremental factors like how much 18 game sets can truly count etcjosko.ri wrote:I wanted to say, that no matter in which Division someone played, it is important which clans they played with. as this system of calculation validate all historical data of all clans, then CL3 results should be validated according to clans faced and their ranking in moment when match was done, and it would be very unfair to just give 55 (wins achieved) vs 45 (average wins in Division) because some Divisions are weaker and some are stronger. numbers and rankings(from previous wars) of clans from particular Division will show which clans were weaker/stronger and therefore validate performance of a clan according to strenght of opponent's clan, not according to average number of wins in a Division.

All I want is somebody else to maintain a data set at a fixed URL that we ALL can use (in the format I can directly use, or in a different format that I could write a script to parse). If there are 10 people with different ranking systems, it's dumb for each person to have to maintain the data from the exact same games separately. Very inefficient.qwert wrote:lol, so all these job,its that someone else work ranking instead you.
Look on mine elo ranking, i doing all job, and these is how you also need to do.
Jpcloet all ready have official ranking.
I'm sure Jp or one of the CD's have a Data Set that they use for their own purposes?FarangDemon wrote:http://www.killersapp.com/AllData.txt
This is the format I'd like. Just one line for every clan war. I'd also like to include results from Clan League.
If someone could maintain that data, then I or anybody else who wants to develop a ranking script could simply link to that URL so they always have the most up to date clan war results.
Thanks, Leehar. I enjoyed programming it, especially the graphing part.Leehar wrote: I like how you've done all this leg-work in getting the script up and running,
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 5#p3088157Leehar wrote:
but I really doubt you'll get any takers on using this to develop a ranking of their own, it really would be best if you developed one yourself for visibility purposes. I know you have played around with it, and I saw all the graphs etc that you showed, but if instead of the cl3 one you have in your OP, you could develop a complete tabular picture there so that we have a better idea of the end result we'll be looking at, I think that would best help this continue further.
If you look at the formula and believe that the formula is straightforward and fair, you trust the results because you know they come from a sound formula.Leehar wrote:I think some of us have already mentioned some aspects of the results that seem a bit 'off' to us, so if we can work on that aspect it would be conducive to a better framework I feel.
No number crunching necessary. Provide me a URL with complete clan war results and I will use it myself. Other people can then either use my script with varying parameters or develop their own script which could be completely different, but still based on the same data set provided by jpcloet's URL.Leehar wrote:This is as opposed to each one of us doing our own number-crunching, which is what I think you're suggesting?
xxtig12683xx wrote:yea, my fav part was being in the sewer riding a surfboard and wacking these alien creatures.
shit was badass
Thanks for replying and I understand that you are busy. However, if you think you won´t be able to get to it in the coming weeks, maybe you can assign someone else from the Clan Director team to do it? I would recommend an update schedule of at least every month.jpcloet wrote:I'm thinking about getting the data out of Excel and into a database/site. I'm working on 2 other major projects (1 CC and 1 non-CC) right now.
