Page 3 of 6
Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:41 am
by firstholliday
Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:54 pm
by Qwert
MYT-G1 2-2
well i think that MYT take win against AKA- final score could be 8-4 or 9-3 for MYT.

Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 10:40 am
by gradybridges
Week 3 away line up for WAR vs MYTH sent to benga but just gonna pm/post so if it changes again I'm covered
Route 66
Mass Miracle stevenshome
British Isles
vaz2103 bigg chief
Imp Romanium
hmsps severs stevenshome
CairnCoralCoast
hmsps sdh stevenshome
Quads 2.1
DavDanilo TheRookThief sekretar vaz2103
Pearl Harbor
vaz2103 bigg chief severs Shaun850
Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 1:55 pm
by gradybridges
Had to sub out
atax in 3 games due to unforseen illness. hope that is ok.
Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 4:46 pm
by benga
All home games made!
Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 8:05 pm
by woopintroysbutt
Here are Myth's players for WAR's home games for Round 3:
1D-Peloponnesian war--Sirmium Samurai--Phulish
2D-AOR2---ESQuire--bazza
1T-Lunar War---jasholz--theguard--acrazyfella
2T-Feudal War---woopintroysbutt--petey--Landain
1Q-South Africa---qwert--D00MandD3A7H--kjg21-IanG7
2Q-Africa---anonadick--karel--peanutsdad--alcazar
Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G
Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 7:51 pm
by laughingcavalier
Tough match against WAR. We are 3-0 up but WAR have a lot of leads - too soon to call the winner. Looks like some good games.
Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 9:23 am
by eddie2
aka take the first easy style.
Game 10530178
i think clapper needs to give her monkeys a good spank
Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 9:17 am
by Qwert
final score for Myt-Aka round will be 8-4 for MYT.
Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 2:24 pm
by woopintroysbutt
Below are Myth's Home Games and Setting for Round 4 against TSM.
1D--Arms Race--jgalioto--bigragooch--------------------------------------------flat-chain-fog
2D--All your base belong---kjg21--IanG7-----------------------------------------esc-chain-fog
1T--Das Schloss---Zidane-21--Sirmium Samurai--fumandomuerte------------no spoils, unlimited, and foggy.
2T--Treausers of Galapagos---petey--Landain--orangenitrox-----------------esc-chain-fog
1Q--Kings Court---petey--Landain--bazza--fumandomuerte------------------esc-chain-fog
2Q---Stalingrad---Phulish--kjg21--IanG7--anonadick----------------------------chained, no spoils, foggy
Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 7:16 pm
by laughingcavalier
TSM vrs MYTH
firstholliday-frop Middle East ns ch sunny
Kratos644-luckywar AOR2 ns ch foggy
laddida, Blind Date, Skillfull - Alex empire, ns,chained,sunny
Luckywar – laughingcavalier – ender_w99 - Kings Court ns ch foggy
kratos644, laddida, Tisha, Clapper011 - WWII Europe, ns, ch, sunny
Jalen45, kmacready, Georgerx7di Skillfull - Supermax, ns, ch, foggy
Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:56 pm
by Qwert
TSM-AKA--0-3
these is suprisse start(shocked)
Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 6:46 pm
by eddie2
qwert wrote:TSM-AKA--0-3
these is suprisse start(shocked)
qwert it is only 0-1 plz post correct info dont guess what the results will be.
Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 9:03 pm
by Qwert
eddie2 wrote:qwert wrote:TSM-AKA--0-3
these is suprisse start(shocked)
qwert it is only 0-1 plz post correct info dont guess what the results will be.
cam on eddie, do i predict correct previous results, give me some support.
Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:45 am
by eddie2
qwert wrote:eddie2 wrote:qwert wrote:TSM-AKA--0-3
these is suprisse start(shocked)
qwert it is only 0-1 plz post correct info dont guess what the results will be.
cam on eddie, do i predict correct previous results, give me some support.
rofl in the other games we were against you in these ones you cannot see what is happening. one of the games you have said is border line we might of killed a player but they are still stacked.(something you would not be able to see because game is fog.)
Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 8:26 am
by sdh
looking like WAR will draw 6-6 with G1 and lose 7-5 to TSM. Still early in the games with Myth, but looks like they have the edge.
Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:45 am
by Qwert
eddie are these not aloved to predict results?
Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 12:23 pm
by Leehar
qwert, ignore eddie and you'll be better for it

Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 1:06 pm
by laughingcavalier
Everyone keen to beat us I see.
TSM vrs WAR - we win, currently score is 7-3. GG chaps, charming & testing opponents.
TSM vrs AKA current score 1-1.
Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 2:18 pm
by karel
Leehar wrote:qwert, ignore eddie and you'll be better for it

agree
Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 2:32 pm
by Qwert
well i look on all games,and AKA had nice start- and if these stay like now-Aka can win against TSM with score 7-5,or 8-4.
These could be first suprisse result in G group.
G1 vs Myt- could be 7-5 or 6-6
Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 7:27 pm
by eddie2
Leehar wrote:qwert, ignore eddie and you'll be better for it

leehar all i am saying he is putting inaccurate scores down if the scores were true then no problem but they were not.
Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:47 pm
by Qwert
eddie2 wrote:Leehar wrote:qwert, ignore eddie and you'll be better for it

leehar all i am saying he is putting inaccurate scores down if the scores were true then no problem but they were not.
lol eddie,these its not innacurate scores,these its call predictions.
I give you example-MAnchester United play against Chelsea- you say " MU will win 1-0", now these is call prediction, these not mean that you will be right or wrong. And these is not against any rules, in some countries you can bet on money,to predict results.
Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 11:48 pm
by Kinnison
First:
Apologies from G1. I was on vacation, I didn't tell benga - because I had a secondary contact, but I and my second dropped the ball, and we didn't get our R4 games submitted in a timely manner. We'll play the random settings and invites sent, as per the rules. We ask that any needed invites be re-sent, due to confusion on our end with what was going on. Not everyone in G1 (even those on the list of 10) was aware of the penalty clause. I clearly wasn't around to be accepting invites, and I'm on that list of 10.
Second:
Personal apologies - same issue: *I* didn't get things straight with my second. *I* didn't tell benga or our W4 foes that there might be a hitch or delay. As a result, they contacted who they knew - not our secondary contact, and that caused FURTHER problems on our end.
Third:
I'm back. We'll be fine for away teams (almost assembled now) for W4, and W5 will be fine as well.
Re: [CL4] Phase One - Division G
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 3:32 am
by eddie2
Kinnison wrote:First:
Apologies from G1. I was on vacation, I didn't tell benga - because I had a secondary contact, but I and my second dropped the ball, and we didn't get our R4 games submitted in a timely manner. We'll play the random settings and invites sent, as per the rules. We ask that any needed invites be re-sent, due to confusion on our end with what was going on. Not everyone in G1 (even those on the list of 10) was aware of the penalty clause. I clearly wasn't around to be accepting invites, and I'm on that list of 10.
Second:
Personal apologies - same issue: *I* didn't get things straight with my second. *I* didn't tell benga or our W4 foes that there might be a hitch or delay. As a result, they contacted who they knew - not our secondary contact, and that caused FURTHER problems on our end.
Third:
I'm back. We'll be fine for away teams (almost assembled now) for W4, and W5 will be fine as well.
it is a real pity they picked this one rule to actually stick 2.. i did say it was ok for you to use your set. after a discussion with a g1 member.
and ps qwert when you post this.
qwert wrote:TSM-AKA--0-3
these is suprisse start(shocked)
that is not a prediction that is you saying we have won 3 games when we had only won 1 game. and still have.