Gen.LeeGettinhed [Closed] DCR

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
User avatar
deathcomesrippin
Posts: 1326
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:26 am
Gender: Male
Location: Canada

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed [Pending] DCR

Post by deathcomesrippin »

This case is closed.

There was a lot of discussion about this case, and it still boils down to the fact that even though his tactics may be considered not of the highest quality, they are still legal.

I would like to point out that any further cases brought before us about this exact topic will be considered spurious reports, as the games he is playing are not breaking any rules. Please refrain from it any more. If you would like to see changes, unfortunately this is not the forum to post those suggestions. Please post them in Suggestions.
GoranZ
Posts: 2937
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 3:14 pm

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed [Pending] DCR

Post by GoranZ »

deathcomesrippin wrote:This case is closed.

There was a lot of discussion about this case, and it still boils down to the fact that even though his tactics may be considered not of the highest quality, they are still legal.
Since there are reports about GLG's playing tactics on weekly basis its obviously wast majority of the players dont agree with you. Ofcourse you can ignore them but that will eventually bring only bad things to the game.
deathcomesrippin wrote:I would like to point out that any further cases brought before us about this exact topic will be considered spurious reports, as the games he is playing are not breaking any rules. Please refrain from it any more. If you would like to see changes, unfortunately this is not the forum to post those suggestions. Please post them in Suggestions.
Not suggestions but Bugs... obviously there are bugs in some combinations of maps, settings and rules.

One question. Is it legal to use bugs in the game for points increase?

Goran
Even a little kid knows whats the name of my country... http://youtu.be/XFxjy7f9RpY

Interested in clans? Check out the Fallen!
User avatar
Evil Semp
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
Posts: 8494
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed [Pending] DCR

Post by Evil Semp »

GoranZ wrote:
deathcomesrippin wrote:This case is closed.

There was a lot of discussion about this case, and it still boils down to the fact that even though his tactics may be considered not of the highest quality, they are still legal.
Since there are reports about GLG's playing tactics on weekly basis its obviously wast majority of the players dont agree with you. Ofcourse you can ignore them but that will eventually bring only bad things to the game.
Not a majority just the vocal group.
GoranZ wrote:
deathcomesrippin wrote:I would like to point out that any further cases brought before us about this exact topic will be considered spurious reports, as the games he is playing are not breaking any rules. Please refrain from it any more. If you would like to see changes, unfortunately this is not the forum to post those suggestions. Please post them in Suggestions.
Not suggestions but Bugs... obviously there are bugs in some combinations of maps, settings and rules.

One question. Is it legal to use bugs in the game for points increase?

Goran
Not a bug either.
Image
User avatar
cookie0117
Posts: 566
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 7:54 am

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed [Closed] DCR

Post by cookie0117 »

So inviting people to private games under the pretense of "teaching them the game/map", when really you are charging them 5-6 points to see how to get their asses whipped. Without giving them any lessons or advice on the map during game play. Is seems a gross abuse of the game. As personally it seem deceptive to start and invite to games in that way.

Its definately unsporting/dishonest. Which I feel should be considered a gross abuse of the game as its a gross abuse of players.
GoranZ
Posts: 2937
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 3:14 pm

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed [Pending] DCR

Post by GoranZ »

Evil Semp wrote:Not a majority just the vocal group.
How do you know what those that haven't said anything think?
Evil Semp wrote:
GoranZ wrote:Not suggestions but Bugs... obviously there are bugs in some combinations of maps, settings and rules.
Not a bug either.
If its not a bug then how did GLG manage to achieve 196 wins out of 198 games and to earn average ~5 points per game? Looking at the percentages he is more efficient then most of industrial machines(they do few percents mistake) or some irregularities are involved.
Even a little kid knows whats the name of my country... http://youtu.be/XFxjy7f9RpY

Interested in clans? Check out the Fallen!
User avatar
Evil Semp
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
Posts: 8494
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed [Pending] DCR

Post by Evil Semp »

GoranZ wrote:
Evil Semp wrote:Not a majority just the vocal group.
How do you know what those that haven't said anything think?
How do you know what the majority think?
GoranZ wrote:
Evil Semp wrote:
GoranZ wrote:Not suggestions but Bugs... obviously there are bugs in some combinations of maps, settings and rules.
Not a bug either.
If its not a bug then how did GLG manage to achieve 196 wins out of 198 games and to earn average ~5 points per game? Looking at the percentages he is more efficient then most of industrial machines(they do few percents mistake) or some irregularities are involved.
He chooses his opponents and a map that he knows. Cheap? Yes. Bug? No.
Image
User avatar
king achilles
Support Admin
Support Admin
Posts: 13431
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:55 pm
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed [Closed] DCR

Post by king achilles »

GoranZ feel free to post in the Bug Reports forum or pm me what exactly do you see here as a bug. C&A is a forum to make reports about cheating and the Bug Reports is the forum to state any bug issues. General Discussions is the forum where you can engage in CC related subjects. There is also the Off Topics forum where you can discuss things not related to Conquer Club. If you think certain combination of settings should not be allowed, please post your idea in the Suggestions Forum.

As for these Ranching reports, we are aware of this issue and we are also thinking of solutions in addressing this subject just so you know. And as what deathcomesrippin said, it still boils down to the fact that even though his tactics may be considered not of the "highest quality", they are still legal.
Image
Please don't have more than 1 account. If you have any CC concerns, you can contact us here.
eddie2
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Gender: Male
Location: Southampton uk

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed [Closed] DCR

Post by eddie2 »

cookie0117 wrote:So inviting people to private games under the pretense of "teaching them the game/map", when really you are charging them 5-6 points to see how to get their asses whipped. Without giving them any lessons or advice on the map during game play. Is seems a gross abuse of the game. As personally it seem deceptive to start and invite to games in that way.

Its definately unsporting/dishonest. Which I feel should be considered a gross abuse of the game as its a gross abuse of players.
you have forgot to add to this that after glg beats them and they show they do not understand the map and will join the game because it is seen as a special thing getting invited to a game from the top player on site and most will do it once.. glg gets lanlards to invite them to a team doubles game these games are made the same private glg and lanlards on 1 side while there opponants are 2 players they have invited to the game, these 2 players have never played with each other or team games before... now this 2nd part to what is happening must be against site rules somewhere.
User avatar
Leehar
Posts: 5492
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 12:12 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Johannesburg
Contact:

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed [Pending] DCR

Post by Leehar »

Evil Semp wrote:
GoranZ wrote:
deathcomesrippin wrote:This case is closed.

There was a lot of discussion about this case, and it still boils down to the fact that even though his tactics may be considered not of the highest quality, they are still legal.
Since there are reports about GLG's playing tactics on weekly basis its obviously wast majority of the players dont agree with you. Ofcourse you can ignore them but that will eventually bring only bad things to the game.
Not a majority just the vocal group.
I don't think the Report-writer Shai however really belongs to it? Perhaps the 'usual contingent' jumped on it support of it, but if there are people who are unacquainted with the forums and the fine line in legality, I doubt it's fair for them to be punished for spurious reporting if they are experiencing a seemingly natural flow of thinking glg is breaking the spirit of the rules?
Spoiler
#27
Nobody has a higher score or more medals with less games completed ;)
My Dispatch Interview
User avatar
deathcomesrippin
Posts: 1326
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:26 am
Gender: Male
Location: Canada

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed [Closed] DCR

Post by deathcomesrippin »

eddie2 wrote:
cookie0117 wrote:So inviting people to private games under the pretense of "teaching them the game/map", when really you are charging them 5-6 points to see how to get their asses whipped. Without giving them any lessons or advice on the map during game play. Is seems a gross abuse of the game. As personally it seem deceptive to start and invite to games in that way.

Its definately unsporting/dishonest. Which I feel should be considered a gross abuse of the game as its a gross abuse of players.
you have forgot to add to this that after glg beats them and they show they do not understand the map and will join the game because it is seen as a special thing getting invited to a game from the top player on site and most will do it once.. glg gets lanlards to invite them to a team doubles game these games are made the same private glg and lanlards on 1 side while there opponants are 2 players they have invited to the game, these 2 players have never played with each other or team games before... now this 2nd part to what is happening must be against site rules somewhere.
Again though, as low as the tactic may be, it is not against any written rule at this point. The players invited are not NRs, so there is no farming involved. Ranching is at this juncture within the rules. Just because they do it in doubles does not make it any less legal. This form of ranching may be a new low, but it is unpunishable. Sorry.
User avatar
deathcomesrippin
Posts: 1326
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:26 am
Gender: Male
Location: Canada

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed [Pending] DCR

Post by deathcomesrippin »

Leehar wrote:
Evil Semp wrote:
GoranZ wrote:
deathcomesrippin wrote:This case is closed.

There was a lot of discussion about this case, and it still boils down to the fact that even though his tactics may be considered not of the highest quality, they are still legal.
Since there are reports about GLG's playing tactics on weekly basis its obviously wast majority of the players dont agree with you. Ofcourse you can ignore them but that will eventually bring only bad things to the game.
Not a majority just the vocal group.
I don't think the Report-writer Shai however really belongs to it? Perhaps the 'usual contingent' jumped on it support of it, but if there are people who are unacquainted with the forums and the fine line in legality, I doubt it's fair for them to be punished for spurious reporting if they are experiencing a seemingly natural flow of thinking glg is breaking the spirit of the rules?
It would be case by case basis, for sure. All my post was referring to was the fact that unless the rule changes these cases and any similar will be closed immediately, and we will look at the reporter on a case by case basis.
eddie2
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Gender: Male
Location: Southampton uk

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed [Closed] DCR

Post by eddie2 »

well the thing you got to look at is the fact glg is not inviting them to the games i will go as far as to say these players would not accept another invite from glg.. so he gets lanlards to invite them then once they join glg joins the games.. this if it is the way it is happening has got to come under invite abuse.
User avatar
Evil Semp
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
Posts: 8494
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed [Closed] DCR

Post by Evil Semp »

eddie2 wrote:well the thing you got to look at is the fact glg is not inviting them to the games i will go as far as to say these players would not accept another invite from glg.. so he gets lanlards to invite them then once they join glg joins the games.. this if it is the way it is happening has got to come under invite abuse.
eddie change your approach. Try getting GLG on tax evasion or something similar.
Image
eddie2
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Gender: Male
Location: Southampton uk

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed [Closed] DCR

Post by eddie2 »

lol :twisted:
User avatar
Gen.LeeGettinhed
Posts: 535
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:32 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (just south of El USA -- that's Spanish for The USA)

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed [Closed] DCR

Post by Gen.LeeGettinhed »

cookie0117 wrote:. . .So inviting people to private games under the pretense of "teaching them the game/map", when really you are charging them 5-6 points to see how to get their asses whipped. Without giving them any lessons or advice on the map during game play. . .
wrong on several counts -- your facts are old/mixed up:
NO PRETENSE:
- I haven't promised to teach them the game in well over a year
- when I DID promise to teach, I did -- in detail: and 2 people earned 1,000 and 2,500 pts from those maps
CHARGING 5-6 PTS TO GET ASSES WHIPPED, but 5-6 pts:
- to offset RISK of -60, -80, -100 pts to me -- it's like a raffle/lottery to them
- so they should pay 20 pts to get beat by others?
- privates-sgts that play high ranks SHOULD expect to lose -- they LIKE playing higher ranks
WITHOUT GIVING ANY LESSONS.. . DURING GAME PLAY:
- DURING the game? and add more risk to losing 60-100 pts? are you insane? I run a business here
- see above, I rarely promise lessons - but when I did, I delivered

Please get your facts straight before exaggerating/BSing the public

GLG

* * *WARNING: all baiting/flaming items have been scrubbed from this reply
eddie2
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Gender: Male
Location: Southampton uk

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed [Closed] DCR

Post by eddie2 »

Gen.LeeGettinhed wrote:
cookie0117 wrote:. . .So inviting people to private games under the pretense of "teaching them the game/map", when really you are charging them 5-6 points to see how to get their asses whipped. Without giving them any lessons or advice on the map during game play. . .
wrong on several counts -- your facts are old/mixed up:
NO PRETENSE:
- I haven't promised to teach them the game in well over a year
- when I DID promise to teach, I did -- in detail: and 2 people earned 1,000 and 2,500 pts from those maps
CHARGING 5-6 PTS TO GET ASSES WHIPPED, but 5-6 pts:
- to offset RISK of -60, -80, -100 pts to me -- it's like a raffle/lottery to them
- so they should pay 20 pts to get beat by others?
- privates-sgts that play high ranks SHOULD expect to lose -- they LIKE playing higher ranks
WITHOUT GIVING ANY LESSONS.. . DURING GAME PLAY:
- DURING the game? and add more risk to losing 60-100 pts? are you insane? I run a business here
- see above, I rarely promise lessons - but when I did, I delivered

Please get your facts straight before exaggerating/BSing the public

GLG

* * *WARNING: all baiting/flaming items have been scrubbed from this reply
quoted for the next case lol.
User avatar
deathcomesrippin
Posts: 1326
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:26 am
Gender: Male
Location: Canada

Re: Gen.LeeGettinhed [Closed] DCR

Post by deathcomesrippin »

I think this has run its' course.

LOCKED.
Locked

Return to “Closed C&A Reports”