Conquer Club

danfrank666 4.0 all opponents
Luck Avg Roll 1's 2's 3's 4's 5's 6's Luck Avg Roll 1's 2's 3's 4's 5's 6's
Assault +2% 3.56 16 8 15 6 19 13 +20% 4.00 6 4 2 2 10 9
Defend -6% 3.34 9 6 11 2 3 10 +7% 3.67 14 13 15 12 12 21
Total -1% 3.48 25 14 26 8 22 23 +10% 3.76 20 17 17 14 22 30






Every day i can post where i am getting fucked

Luck Avg Roll 1's 2's 3's 4's 5's 6's
Assault 0% 3.50 125506 125539 125334 126007 125790 125501 0% 3.50 78047 78013 77997 77806 77608 78673
Defend 0% 3.50 40012 39947 40376 40381 40310 40052 0% 3.50 67329 67210 67530 67235 67175 67536
Total 0% 3.50 165518 165486 165710 166388 166100 165553 0% 3.50 145376 145223 145527 145041 144783 146209




The point of this is to show that my opponents roll sixes 700+ more times than the next #

In the neural crest by the sounds of things.

danfrank666 wrote:Luck Avg Roll 1's 2's 3's 4's 5's 6's
Assault 0% 3.50 125506 125539 125334 126007 125790 125501 0% 3.50 78047 78013 77997 77806 77608 78673
Defend 0% 3.50 40012 39947 40376 40381 40310 40052 0% 3.50 67329 67210 67530 67235 67175 67536
Total 0% 3.50 165518 165486 165710 166388 166100 165553 0% 3.50 145376 145223 145527 145041 144783 146209




The point of this is to show that my opponents roll sixes 700+ more times than the next #

and my sixes total places fourth on my list

iAmCaffeine wrote:In the neural crest by the sounds of things.

Quoting myself due to the stupidity of your last comment.

Recent dice rolls (20 battles)

asellas1025 4.8 all opponents
Luck Avg Roll 1's 2's 3's 4's 5's 6's Luck Avg Roll 1's 2's 3's 4's 5's 6's
Assault -3% 3.43 8 11 16 12 11 7 +15% 3.88 2 7 4 8 2 9
Defend +17% 3.93 2 3 4 7 8 3 +6% 3.64 11 6 8 8 6 14
Total +3% 3.58 10 14 20 19 19 10 +9% 3.73 13 13 12 16 8 23
Overall dice rolls

asellas1025 4.8 all opponents
Luck Avg Roll 1's 2's 3's 4's 5's 6's Luck Avg Roll 1's 2's 3's 4's 5's 6's
Assault 0% 3.50 9674 9814 9909 9931 9966 9658 0% 3.51 5087 4949 5120 5119 5197 5121
Defend 0% 3.50 4753 4877 4776 4888 4844 4782 0% 3.50 9739 9819 9596 9808 9792 9702
Total 0% 3.50 14427 14691 14685 14819 14810 14440 0% 3.50 14826 14768 14716 14927 14989 14823

one thing a love the moist about this site is... during a speed game my round numbers do not change next to the player stats , and i am supposed to think that this game is copacetic

danfrank666 wrote:one thing a love the moist about this site is... during a speed game my round numbers do not change next to the player stats , and i am supposed to think that this game is copacetic

i don't have that issue...-Jésus noir

Luck Avg Roll 1's 2's 3's 4's 5's 6's Luck Avg Roll 1's 2's 3's 4's 5's 6's
Assault -1% 3.47 7 6 11 8 6 7 +44% 4.60 1 3 1 7 1 12
Defend -4% 3.41 6 4 5 4 6 4 -8% 3.30 10 14 7 14 7 8
Total -2% 3.45 13 10 16 12 12 11 +7% 3.68 11 17 8 21 8 20
Overall dice rolls

danfrank666 4.0 all opponents
Luck Avg Roll 1's 2's 3's 4's 5's 6's Luck Avg Roll 1's 2's 3's 4's 5's 6's
Assault 0% 3.50 126387 126440 126243 126825 126648 126369 0% 3.50 78578 78517 78478 78294 78080 79143
Defend 0% 3.50 40428 40375 40786 40811 40697 40514 0% 3.50 68102 67968 68295 67995 67968 68371
Total 0% 3.50 166815 166815 167029 167636 167345 166883 0% 3.50 146680 146

3 vs 2 3 vs 1 2 vs 2 2 vs 1 1 vs 2 1 vs 1
Luck Kills Losses Luck Kills Losses Luck Kills Losses Luck Kills Losses Luck Kills Losses Luck Kills Losses
Assault -19% 7 13 +17% 5 1 0 0 -33% 1 3 +25% 1 1 -8% 1 2
Defend +4% 9 9 -9% 3 9 0 0 -2% 2 3 0 0 -58% 0 2
Total -8% 16 22 0% 8 10 0 0 -16% 3 6 +25% 1 1 -28% 1




THIS SITE SUCKS

Danfrank, the one thing i can say about your dice's pattern compared to a normal players is that for some reason you and your opponents roll more 1s than normal games...

Most people roll fewer 1s than any number... but in your games 1's are much more likely... odd


And Owen never rolls 4s against the neutral but always rolls 4s against other players... odd

KraphtOne wrote:Danfrank, the one thing i can say about your dice's pattern compared to a normal players is that for some reason you and your opponents roll more 1s than normal games...

Most people roll fewer 1s than any number... but in your games 1's are much more likely... odd

danfrank's dice rolls:
1's: 166887
2's: 166897
3's: 167129
4's: 167714
5's: 167425
6's: 166965

Which number is the smallest?

If you're going by his posts, it's because he's cherry picking the data and posting every time he has a bad run.

Suggestion:

Type "bigWham is the best!"

You'll receive better dice.

degaston wrote: 3v1 attacks give you the best winning probability, so when you allow your opponents to attack you 3v1 much more than you attack them, you are giving them a huge advantage in the game. Most of the time, it's not the dice that cause you to win or lose, it's the decisions you make about when and where to attack.

So much win here

Metsfanmax wrote:

degaston wrote: 3v1 attacks give you the best winning probability, so when you allow your opponents to attack you 3v1 much more than you attack them, you are giving them a huge advantage in the game. Most of the time, it's not the dice that cause you to win or lose, it's the decisions you make about when and where to attack.

So much win here

Coming from a guy with a 37% win rate and a high score of 1685

demonfork wrote:

Metsfanmax wrote:

degaston wrote: 3v1 attacks give you the best winning probability, so when you allow your opponents to attack you 3v1 much more than you attack them, you are giving them a huge advantage in the game. Most of the time, it's not the dice that cause you to win or lose, it's the decisions you make about when and where to attack.

So much win here

Coming from a guy with a 37% win rate and a high score of 1685

My high score is well over 2000. Nice try though.

Metsfanmax wrote:

demonfork wrote:

Metsfanmax wrote:

degaston wrote: 3v1 attacks give you the best winning probability, so when you allow your opponents to attack you 3v1 much more than you attack them, you are giving them a huge advantage in the game. Most of the time, it's not the dice that cause you to win or lose, it's the decisions you make about when and where to attack.

So much win here

Coming from a guy with a 37% win rate and a high score of 1685

My high score is well over 2000. Nice try though.

big fucking deal, over 2000 ain't shit and your win % is dog shit as well.

You are the last person that should be talking shit about others' strategies.


Since it's clear that you suck ass at games involving strategy you are probably a terrible chess player as well.

demonfork wrote:

Metsfanmax wrote:

demonfork wrote:

Metsfanmax wrote:

degaston wrote: 3v1 attacks give you the best winning probability, so when you allow your opponents to attack you 3v1 much more than you attack them, you are giving them a huge advantage in the game. Most of the time, it's not the dice that cause you to win or lose, it's the decisions you make about when and where to attack.

So much win here

Coming from a guy with a 37% win rate and a high score of 1685

My high score is well over 2000. Nice try though.

big fucking deal, over 2000 ain't shit and your win % is dog shit as well.

You are the last person that should be talking shit about others' strategies.

Who's strategies was he talking shit about?

Did you interpret the "So much win here" comment as sarcasm?

I agree with Gary completely.

degaston wrote:

demonfork wrote:

Metsfanmax wrote:

demonfork wrote:

Metsfanmax wrote:

degaston wrote: 3v1 attacks give you the best winning probability, so when you allow your opponents to attack you 3v1 much more than you attack them, you are giving them a huge advantage in the game. Most of the time, it's not the dice that cause you to win or lose, it's the decisions you make about when and where to attack.

So much win here

Coming from a guy with a 37% win rate and a high score of 1685

My high score is well over 2000. Nice try though.

big fucking deal, over 2000 ain't shit and your win % is dog shit as well.

You are the last person that should be talking shit about others' strategies.

Who's strategies was he talking shit about?

Did you interpret the "So much win here" comment as sarcasm?

No interpreting necessary... it's clearly sarcasm.

demonfork wrote:No interpreting necessary... it's clearly sarcasm.

I didn't take it that way, and I'm pretty sure that Mets agrees that the dice are not programmed to favor anyone, so this whole thread is kind of stupid.

Not sure why you're offended by his comment on my post anyway.

degaston wrote:

demonfork wrote:No interpreting necessary... it's clearly sarcasm.

I didn't take it that way, and I'm pretty sure that Mets agrees that the dice are not programmed to favor anyone, so this whole thread is kind of stupid.

It wasn't sarcasm. I thought degaston's post was hilarious and I was complimenting him for his well-put argument. If demonfork wants to use the opportunity to talk about how bad he thinks I am at internet Risk, then whatever. As long as he's proud of something in his life.

Dishonest site !!!!!!!!!!!!!! Not random


danfrank666 3.9 all opponents
Luck Avg Roll 1's 2's 3's 4's 5's 6's Luck Avg Roll 1's 2's 3's 4's 5's 6's
Assault -7% 3.33 17 10 7 19 11 9 +18% 3.95 4 4 7 9 11 7
Defend -7% 3.33 6 7 7 6 5 5 +5% 3.63 15 9 13 3 15 17
Total -7% 3.33 23 17 14 25 16 14 +10% 3.75 19 13 20 12 26 24


Dice are always on the down side......

danfrank666 wrote: Dice are always on the down side......

Only for you. Your opponents paid the good dice fee.

degaston wrote:

KraphtOne wrote:Danfrank, the one thing i can say about your dice's pattern compared to a normal players is that for some reason you and your opponents roll more 1s than normal games...

Most people roll fewer 1s than any number... but in your games 1's are much more likely... odd

danfrank's dice rolls:
1's: 166887
2's: 166897
3's: 167129
4's: 167714
5's: 167425
6's: 166965

Which number is the smallest?

If you're going by his posts, it's because he's cherry picking the data and posting every time he has a bad run.

Those are not his dice stats...

and even if they were... his 1s are much too high there... most people roll 1s much less frequently