Moderator: Community Team
And this is a thread that CC chose to remember?Dukasaur wrote:Don't know with 100% certainty, but I'm 95% certain it's a simple matter of storage space. We've outstripped the storage capacity of the server, and with CC losing money, there's no way anyone's upgrading the server any more. Remember a couple weeks ago when we lost half a day's data in all the games? That was a simple matter of no more room on the server. Since the game matters and the forums are a frill, the forums are being trimmed to make sure the game, at least, remains viable.Thorthoth wrote: Seriously, Duk who purged the forum and why?!. You must know the real story. C'mon spill the beans.
Yeah, I don't disagree.Thorthoth wrote:It was foolish. 10+ years of early third millennium game site history: gone.
Mind you, I'm still guessing, nobody has said anything officially, but I don't think anyone looked at content. They just went 60 days from day of last post and chopped it there. Sort of the same theory that you should throw out any clothes that you haven't worn in a year.Symmetry wrote:And this is a thread that CC chose to remember?Dukasaur wrote:Don't know with 100% certainty, but I'm 95% certain it's a simple matter of storage space. We've outstripped the storage capacity of the server, and with CC losing money, there's no way anyone's upgrading the server any more. Remember a couple weeks ago when we lost half a day's data in all the games? That was a simple matter of no more room on the server. Since the game matters and the forums are a frill, the forums are being trimmed to make sure the game, at least, remains viable.Thorthoth wrote: Seriously, Duk who purged the forum and why?!. You must know the real story. C'mon spill the beans.
People actually do that? The throwing out clothes thing? Isn't that the kind of advice you get from fashion mags?Dukasaur wrote:Mind you, I'm still guessing, nobody has said anything officially, but I don't think anyone looked at content. They just went 60 days from day of last post and chopped it there. Sort of the same theory that you should throw out any clothes that you haven't worn in a year.Symmetry wrote:And this is a thread that CC chose to remember?Dukasaur wrote:Don't know with 100% certainty, but I'm 95% certain it's a simple matter of storage space. We've outstripped the storage capacity of the server, and with CC losing money, there's no way anyone's upgrading the server any more. Remember a couple weeks ago when we lost half a day's data in all the games? That was a simple matter of no more room on the server. Since the game matters and the forums are a frill, the forums are being trimmed to make sure the game, at least, remains viable.Thorthoth wrote: Seriously, Duk who purged the forum and why?!. You must know the real story. C'mon spill the beans.
That's exactly what they did. and if I hadn't revived a hundred or more old threads recently the losses would have been even higher. I deserve a medal.... especially since I had to perform this thread salvation against the whinging complaints of a couple of execrable forum-trolls of the lowest order.Symmetry wrote:People actually do that? The throwing out clothes thing? Isn't that the kind of advice you get from fashion mags?Dukasaur wrote:Mind you, I'm still guessing, nobody has said anything officially, but I don't think anyone looked at content. They just went 60 days from day of last post and chopped it there. Sort of the same theory that you should throw out any clothes that you haven't worn in a year.Symmetry wrote:And this is a thread that CC chose to remember?Dukasaur wrote:Don't know with 100% certainty, but I'm 95% certain it's a simple matter of storage space. We've outstripped the storage capacity of the server, and with CC losing money, there's no way anyone's upgrading the server any more. Remember a couple weeks ago when we lost half a day's data in all the games? That was a simple matter of no more room on the server. Since the game matters and the forums are a frill, the forums are being trimmed to make sure the game, at least, remains viable.Thorthoth wrote: Seriously, Duk who purged the forum and why?!. You must know the real story. C'mon spill the beans.
I don't know if people actually do it. I just know it's often published as advice.Symmetry wrote:People actually do that? The throwing out clothes thing? Isn't that the kind of advice you get from fashion mags?Dukasaur wrote:Mind you, I'm still guessing, nobody has said anything officially, but I don't think anyone looked at content. They just went 60 days from day of last post and chopped it there. Sort of the same theory that you should throw out any clothes that you haven't worn in a year.Symmetry wrote:And this is a thread that CC chose to remember?Dukasaur wrote:Don't know with 100% certainty, but I'm 95% certain it's a simple matter of storage space. We've outstripped the storage capacity of the server, and with CC losing money, there's no way anyone's upgrading the server any more. Remember a couple weeks ago when we lost half a day's data in all the games? That was a simple matter of no more room on the server. Since the game matters and the forums are a frill, the forums are being trimmed to make sure the game, at least, remains viable.Thorthoth wrote: Seriously, Duk who purged the forum and why?!. You must know the real story. C'mon spill the beans.

notyou2, how long have you been associating Trump with homosexual thoughts?notyou2 wrote:They should have only purged threads that had something to do with homosexuality. They could have done a search and any reference to any gay person or references to rainbows, homosexuals or Trump they should have deleted.
I would suggest that this is a case of being literally hair brained.Thorthoth wrote:notyou2, how long have you been associating Trump with homosexual thoughts?notyou2 wrote:They should have only purged threads that had something to do with homosexuality. They could have done a search and any reference to any gay person or references to rainbows, homosexuals or Trump they should have deleted.

Whadayamean? Does Trump's carpet match the drapes??BoganGod wrote:I would suggest that this is a case of being literally hair brained.Thorthoth wrote:notyou2, how long have you been associating Trump with homosexual thoughts?notyou2 wrote:They should have only purged threads that had something to do with homosexuality. They could have done a search and any reference to any gay person or references to rainbows, homosexuals or Trump they should have deleted.
You can stop now, I'm bleeding.BoganGod wrote:God, BoganGod mmmmwwwwwwwwaaaaaahaaaaahaaaaahaaaa. You love the salt & citric acid sprinkle I mix into the chilli oil. Who is a naughty boy? Who is a naughty boy? DDS is a naughty, naughty, naughty boy.DirtyDishSoap wrote:I have a nasty habit of being regularly fisted by life or some unknown 3rd party, possibly God.
Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
what an out of range look and light over the perspectivebetiko wrote:more like he can eat pussy but he can't penetrate. Possibly due to erectile disorders.waauw wrote:So you have the innate desire to be on the receiving end?Bernie Sanders wrote:Army of GOD wrote:I'm gay
Gay for women
I'm a lesbian trapped in a man's body.
My friend Tyler told me he doesn't like girls cause girls like dick and that's gay as f*ck.Army of GOD wrote:I'm gay
Gay for women
DirtyDishSoap wrote:You can stop now, I'm bleeding.BoganGod wrote:God, BoganGod mmmmwwwwwwwwaaaaaahaaaaahaaaaahaaaa. You love the salt & citric acid sprinkle I mix into the chilli oil. Who is a naughty boy? Who is a naughty boy? DDS is a naughty, naughty, naughty boy.DirtyDishSoap wrote:I have a nasty habit of being regularly fisted by life or some unknown 3rd party, possibly God.

Describe for me please, how the national socialist workers party of Germany was right wing. If you convince me you are (most) correct, I will agree with yas and give props.Woodruff wrote:Because that's Phatscotty's side - you can't expect him to have the self-awareness to be able to handle that, do you?Symmetry wrote:Why not in it's Right wing Nationalist form- the kind it's most well-known for?Phatscotty wrote:Remain eternally vigilant against ALL Nazi wannabes in all their socialist forms!
I know it's difficult for the pea-brain to follow a simple thread, but "right wing nationalist form" was specifically and clearly stated. But keep obfuscating and tap-dancing...it's still the only thing your arguments have going for them.Phatscotty wrote:Describe for me please, how the national socialist workers party of Germany was right wing. If you convince me you are (most) correct, I will agree with yas and give props.Woodruff wrote:Because that's Phatscotty's side - you can't expect him to have the self-awareness to be able to handle that, do you?Symmetry wrote:Why not in it's Right wing Nationalist form- the kind it's most well-known for?Phatscotty wrote:Remain eternally vigilant against ALL Nazi wannabes in all their socialist forms!
So it could be considered it was on left wing? Please don't tell me you think that because there is the word "socialist" in national socialism, then nazi could be left wing....Phatscotty wrote:Describe for me please, how the national socialist workers party of Germany was right wing. If you convince me you are (most) correct, I will agree with yas and give props.Woodruff wrote:Because that's Phatscotty's side - you can't expect him to have the self-awareness to be able to handle that, do you?Symmetry wrote:Why not in it's Right wing Nationalist form- the kind it's most well-known for?Phatscotty wrote:Remain eternally vigilant against ALL Nazi wannabes in all their socialist forms!
Meh, good luck arguing with Scotty on this. It's an old argument he brings up, and the answer is always:djelebert wrote:So it could be considered it was on left wing? Please don't tell me you think that because there is the word "socialist" in national socialism, then nazi could be left wing....Phatscotty wrote:Describe for me please, how the national socialist workers party of Germany was right wing. If you convince me you are (most) correct, I will agree with yas and give props.Woodruff wrote:Because that's Phatscotty's side - you can't expect him to have the self-awareness to be able to handle that, do you?Symmetry wrote:Why not in it's Right wing Nationalist form- the kind it's most well-known for?Phatscotty wrote:Remain eternally vigilant against ALL Nazi wannabes in all their socialist forms!
so can we talk about democracy in Democratic Republic of Congo...
Clearly stated.... Where? Got a link? I note you declined to Briefly describe a few of the facets and instead side step into tapdancing into an undocumented reference. Sloppy work mateWoodruff wrote:I know it's difficult for the pea-brain to follow a simple thread, but "right wing nationalist form" was specifically and clearly stated. But keep obfuscating and tap-dancing...it's still the only thing your arguments have going for them.Phatscotty wrote:Describe for me please, how the national socialist workers party of Germany was right wing. If you convince me you are (most) correct, I will agree with yas and give props.Woodruff wrote:Because that's Phatscotty's side - you can't expect him to have the self-awareness to be able to handle that, do you?Symmetry wrote:Why not in it's Right wing Nationalist form- the kind it's most well-known for?Phatscotty wrote:Remain eternally vigilant against ALL Nazi wannabes in all their socialist forms!
Woody and Phat are both still here?Woodruff wrote:I know it's difficult for the pea-brain to follow a simple thread, but "right wing nationalist form" was specifically and clearly stated. But keep obfuscating and tap-dancing...it's still the only thing your arguments have going for them.Phatscotty wrote:Describe for me please, how the national socialist workers party of Germany was right wing. If you convince me you are (most) correct, I will agree with yas and give props.Woodruff wrote:Because that's Phatscotty's side - you can't expect him to have the self-awareness to be able to handle that, do you?Symmetry wrote:Why not in it's Right wing Nationalist form- the kind it's most well-known for?Phatscotty wrote:Remain eternally vigilant against ALL Nazi wannabes in all their socialist forms!
Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.