Is it a zombie burger?King_Herpes wrote:Would a burger help?
Moderator: Community Team
Is it a zombie burger?King_Herpes wrote:Would a burger help?
How does S&M and Spanking the Monkey insinuations weigh into this scenario? Is my very moniker not family friendly? What about EB Conqueror's signature of a dapper Tom physically abusing the buttox of the opposite sex? Is sexual exploitation of women cool for children to see? You think racism is bad, take a look at the blatant sexism abound. Should children have to bare witness to that or is that not relevant? I could go on and on about how this could never be a site completely safe for children. That my friend, falls on the gaurdian's shoulders. Don't sit on the fence if you are going to take moral high ground. It's very unbecoming.MAD777 wrote:Guys, no one seems as well to think about under age members, there is for sure parents/uncle/friends who think it would be a cool think to check and thinking having family member to play against in a friendly spirit is maybe a fun things to do...well tell me how a parent/uncle/friend will do that knowing there is chance their kids to be unlucky to see all this crap we are seeing in the Forum? There is also adults who perhaps have a higher degree in their mind thinking this is not great and won't invest in it.

Congratulations on bitching. Would you like to take your complaint to the "CC is in decline," thread? Because whatever you type now or in the future, chances are, it's already been said.xroads wrote:Ah you are so funny
I joined shortly before you did, so you remember what an active gaming site was actually like.
Why do I bitch? Because the site is circling the toilet, and bigwham doesn't really seem to give a shit. Nothing is being done to improve the site and make it better.
This is a gaming site, not a forum community site. The forums should support the games not vice versa. How many people do you think have left CC because excessive rudeness in forums, game chat, live chat, etc?
Also I have been a paying customer for 11 years. As a customer who pays $$ every year, I have a right to bitch when the product sucks.
KH hit this on the spot. We allow a lot more shit on this site that would make people double take. The internet itself is not a very "family friendly" area to begin with. It almost never was or will be. What we allow on here though is pretty tame in comparison to other sites.King_Herpes wrote:How does S&M and Spanking the Monkey insinuations weigh into this scenario? Is my very moniker not family friendly? What about EB Conqueror's signature of a dapper Tom physically abusing the buttox of the opposite sex? Is sexual exploitation of women cool for children to see? You think racism is bad, take a look at the blatant sexism abound. Should children have to bare witness to that or is that not relevant? I could go on and on about how this could never be a site completely safe for children. That my friend, falls on the gaurdian's shoulders. Don't sit on the fence if you are going to take moral high ground. It's very unbecoming.MAD777 wrote:Guys, no one seems as well to think about under age members, there is for sure parents/uncle/friends who think it would be a cool think to check and thinking having family member to play against in a friendly spirit is maybe a fun things to do...well tell me how a parent/uncle/friend will do that knowing there is chance their kids to be unlucky to see all this crap we are seeing in the Forum? There is also adults who perhaps have a higher degree in their mind thinking this is not great and won't invest in it.
So then, where does the line begin and end with you people? It's all personal bias to me. Also it's not our call to make. So try to see what's still good about the game we love and quit tearing at it's very fabric by condemning those who don't feel slighted by all of what CC has to offer. Even the dark icky places.
It's not all bad if you don't want it to be. It's a choice to view it in a negative light.
Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
Don't auto censor the trash and delete mild things without discussion. Explain why some name calling is not ok and how decent people should behave.In case it's too much text here's the synopsis for anyone thinking tl;dr
Several years ago here, a few of us had a discussion that started about a segment Katy Perry filmed for Seasame street, doing a parody of her hit song at the time. People flipped out because of her low cut top and the segment was cut from the show amid controversy.Think about the children.
That is my all point, there is no line...moderation is far from being consistent because those who are on charge have no clue what to do, how to do....despite suggestion made.King_Herpes wrote:How does S&M and Spanking the Monkey insinuations weigh into this scenario? Is my very moniker not family friendly? What about EB Conqueror's signature of a dapper Tom physically abusing the buttox of the opposite sex? Is sexual exploitation of women cool for children to see? You think racism is bad, take a look at the blatant sexism abound. Should children have to bare witness to that or is that not relevant? I could go on and on about how this could never be a site completely safe for children. That my friend, falls on the gaurdian's shoulders. Don't sit on the fence if you are going to take moral high ground. It's very unbecoming.MAD777 wrote:Guys, no one seems as well to think about under age members, there is for sure parents/uncle/friends who think it would be a cool think to check and thinking having family member to play against in a friendly spirit is maybe a fun things to do...well tell me how a parent/uncle/friend will do that knowing there is chance their kids to be unlucky to see all this crap we are seeing in the Forum? There is also adults who perhaps have a higher degree in their mind thinking this is not great and won't invest in it.
So then, where does the line begin and end with you people? It's all personal bias to me. Also it's not our call to make. So try to see what's still good about the game we love and quit tearing at it's very fabric by condemning those who don't feel slighted by all of what CC has to offer. Even the dark icky places.
It's not all bad if you don't want it to be. It's a choice to view it in a negative light.
Actually, that was Jesus who said that.HitRed wrote:Maybe this is a healthy debate but this keeps coming to mind...
"A house divided against itself cannot stand." Lincoln


This is so incredibly pointless.HitRed wrote:Major change to the foe button.
I want to foe _______.
Then player must make a choice.
Reason
1) Gameplay
2) Bad Language
3) Abusive Language
4) Just don't get along.
Choosing 2 or 3 will promp a mod to review posting in game chat. If needed a mod will contact foed player with a warning.
Coding should be easy. Tracking a player over time should be easy.
HitRed
I will make this a new thread tonight.

I have a feeling that if she was in front of you, you'd find your way around. Attour, user friendly = yes.notyou2 wrote:A map of PARIS HILTON'S BODY OR HER SEXCAPADES is not user friendly, NOR APPROPRIATE FOR THIS SITE.
off-topics is fine - if u don't like it, just go read something else.jfm10 wrote:eliminate off-topics completely...keep everything cc related only.

agree 100% w/iAC - in fact, i'm willing to bet that the foe button was invented so mods wouldn't have to get involved in every single squabble that occurs on this site.iAmCaffeine wrote:This is so incredibly pointless.HitRed wrote:Major change to the foe button.
I want to foe _______.
Then player must make a choice.
Reason
1) Gameplay
2) Bad Language
3) Abusive Language
4) Just don't get along.
Choosing 2 or 3 will promp a mod to review posting in game chat. If needed a mod will contact foed player with a warning.
Coding should be easy. Tracking a player over time should be easy.
HitRed
I will make this a new thread tonight.

11,500 left RL. Yep, sounds like the problem was solved.riskllama wrote:lol - those members solve the issue with the foe button, HR...