Moderator: Community Team
It's ok, muy, you know I'm just fucking with you. I use the brand name, or the generic "soda." I'll even throw a "pop" at the end of it sometimes...muy_thaiguy wrote:GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
But STILL!Neoteny wrote:It's ok, muy, you know I'm just fucking with you. I use the brand name, or the generic "soda." I'll even throw a "pop" at the end of it sometimes...muy_thaiguy wrote:GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
If it isn't Coke, its just soda. I don't say pop.Neoteny wrote:It's ok, muy, you know I'm just fucking with you. I use the brand name, or the generic "soda." I'll even throw a "pop" at the end of it sometimes...muy_thaiguy wrote:GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
Not quite (though they are used out here). What I mean is, the "t's" and "d's" that are on the end of every day words (like the word "word" itself, and so many more) tend to be dropped almost 100% of the time. For example, if I were to say the above, it would sound like: No' qui'. Wha I mean is, the "t's" an "d's" tha re on the en' of every day words, ten to be dropp almos 100 % of the time.Jenos Ridan wrote:If it isn't Coke, its just soda. I don't say pop.Neoteny wrote:It's ok, muy, you know I'm just fucking with you. I use the brand name, or the generic "soda." I'll even throw a "pop" at the end of it sometimes...muy_thaiguy wrote:GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
Oh MTG, you mean phrases like "dunno" and "cuz"? That happens out here too.
Barely. I just tried to speak outload the example underlined.muy_thaiguy wrote:Not quite (though they are used out here). What I mean is, the "t's" and "d's" that are on the end of every day words (like the word "word" itself, and so many more) tend to be dropped almost 100% of the time. or example, if I were to say the above, it would sound like: No' qui'. Wha I mean is, the "t's" an "d's" tha re on the en' of every day words, ten to be dropp almos 100 % of the time.Jenos Ridan wrote:
Oh MTG, you mean phrases like "dunno" and "cuz"? That happens out here too.
The words are pronounced the exact same way, except for the ending "t's" and "d's." Understand?
There's CERTAINLY a difference between urban and rural Northwesterners. Rural Northwesterners sound kind of Midwestern, which makes sense when you consider Scandinavian migration patterns. Urban Northwesterners are simply part of late 20th century U.S. American migration patterns and so tend to speak something very similar to what's spoken in most U.S. cities.Jenos Ridan wrote:I guess.
One of these days, I'll figure out what a "Pacific Northwestern" is supposed to sound like. I have heard things like "Suppose" and "Suppost" in place of "Supposed", "Dunno" in place of "Don't Know" and so on. But for every such event, there is a counterpoint.
And from experience, having been as far south as San Jose and as far north as Victoria, people along the west coast have no accents that are unique to any one area (a Portlander sounds no different than a person from Seattle, who talks the same as a guy from San Francisco, etc). Perhaps we all share a number of comman ones? Meaning, there might be a "Urban" and "Rural" accent. Still, not alot of difference there either.....
Yes, most Americans in general are of German and Irish ancestry. However, the Midwest and the Northwest had disproportionately high numbers of Scandinavians migrate there in the 19th century, and those migrants are thought to have given distinctive contributions to the accents and dialects in those areas.muy_thaiguy wrote:Scandinavian? Don't know if that would be the only one (of course I may be misunderstanding what you wrote in that part almost entirely), I'd also factor in Irish and German ancestry, being as how most of the people (or at least it seems like most) are mostly of that heritage.
I was born in CA, migrated all over and never recognized a west coast accent until I moved away. West Coast is more homogenous because the overwelming largest part of the population came within the past 100 years -- shoot might as well say within the past 50 years, maybe even 20! AND yes, it is my experience that west coasters travel a LOT more, on average, than easterners. However, if you listen very closely to someone born near Santa Barbara or south, someone from San Francisco and someone from coastal Washington (maybe not so much urbin Seattle), you will notice subtle differences.btownmeggy wrote:There's CERTAINLY a difference between urban and rural Northwesterners. Rural Northwesterners sound kind of Midwestern, which makes sense when you consider Scandinavian migration patterns. Urban Northwesterners are simply part of late 20th century U.S. American migration patterns and so tend to speak something very similar to what's spoken in most U.S. cities.Jenos Ridan wrote:I guess.
One of these days, I'll figure out what a "Pacific Northwestern" is supposed to sound like. I have heard things like "Suppose" and "Suppost" in place of "Supposed", "Dunno" in place of "Don't Know" and so on. But for every such event, there is a counterpoint.
And from experience, having been as far south as San Jose and as far north as Victoria, people along the west coast have no accents that are unique to any one area (a Portlander sounds no different than a person from Seattle, who talks the same as a guy from San Francisco, etc). Perhaps we all share a number of comman ones? Meaning, there might be a "Urban" and "Rural" accent. Still, not alot of difference there either.....
Makes since. Also, alot of the immigration here has really been emmigration (migration inside national borders, for those who need the explaination), so both explain the homogenous dialect/accent. As it is, I guess I'll have to visit the eastern states sometime. The only question is, are Finns really Scandinavian? From what I've been told, no. I ask because locally there is a landmark to commemerate a local gathering hall for the Finns who lived in the area a long time back. I even know an old friend of the family who is from Finland.btownmeggy wrote:Yes, most Americans in general are of German and Irish ancestry. However, the Midwest and the Northwest had disproportionately high numbers of Scandinavians migrate there in the 19th century, and those migrants are thought to have given distinctive contributions to the accents and dialects in those areas.muy_thaiguy wrote:Scandinavian? Don't know if that would be the only one (of course I may be misunderstanding what you wrote in that part almost entirely), I'd also factor in Irish and German ancestry, being as how most of the people (or at least it seems like most) are mostly of that heritage.
Depends on to whom you talk ...Jenos Ridan wrote:The only question is, are Finns really Scandinavian? From what I've been told, no. I ask because locally there is a landmark to commemerate a local gathering hall for the Finns who lived in the area a long time back. I even know an old friend of the family who is from Finland.
I am now 100% convinced that you are 100% flame, flame, flame.Jenos Ridan wrote: emmigration (migration inside national borders, for those who need the explaination)
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
(a) You say flame like it's a bad thing?btownmeggy wrote:I am now 100% convinced that you are 100% flame, flame, flame.Jenos Ridan wrote: emmigration (migration inside national borders, for those who need the explaination)
You are a schtick.
You cannot possibly exist.
First: Explain what I did to irk you so.btownmeggy wrote:I am now 100% convinced that you are 100% flame, flame, flame.Jenos Ridan wrote: emmigration (migration inside national borders, for those who need the explaination)
You are a schtick.
You cannot possibly exist.
1. Nothing outside of my state exists (that's right, you are ALL in MY state!)Jenos Ridan wrote:First: Explain what I did to irk you so.btownmeggy wrote:I am now 100% convinced that you are 100% flame, flame, flame.Jenos Ridan wrote: emmigration (migration inside national borders, for those who need the explaination)
You are a schtick.
You cannot possibly exist.
Second: I'M the one who is flame?
Third: I DO exist. Otherwise, you are having a psychotic episode and desperately need to see a head doctor.
Fourth: I was only explaining in the politest manner possible to people (not you) what exactly that ment. I'd rather be seen as overly cautious than be a tactless boor like Nappy.
Fifth: What is you problem?! HUH!?!?!?
You are so assured of your superior intellect to the point of being insulting, but you say again and again really stoopid stuff.Jenos Ridan wrote:First: Explain what I did to irk you so.btownmeggy wrote:I am now 100% convinced that you are 100% flame, flame, flame.Jenos Ridan wrote: emmigration (migration inside national borders, for those who need the explaination)
You are a schtick.
You cannot possibly exist.
Second: I'M the one who is flame?
Third: I DO exist. Otherwise, you are having a psychotic episode and desperately need to see a head doctor.
Fourth: I was only explaining in the politest manner possible to people (not you) what exactly that ment. I'd rather be seen as overly cautious than be a tactless boor like Nappy.
Fifth: What is you problem?! HUH!?!?!?
Why? It doesn't have an entry.Penos_Rider wrote:Or even better, look up "Emmigrate".