Moderator: Community Team
well, you argue that a fertilized egg is a human being. that is not something that is decidable here in this forum. the fact that the egg is really a collection of stem cells is actually a better depiction of what a fertilized egg is, in my opinion. the potential is there to become a human being is there, but i do not agree that it is just yet a human being.PopeBenXVI wrote:Lots of views here but truth is not based on a majority opinion. The fact is that a fertilized egg (no matter what state in it's development) is in fact a human being. It can not be anything else. When allowed to grow it will always grow into a human baby and not anything else. Being allowed to attach to the uterin wall is merly how it gets its nutrients to grow larger. The fact that the pill hardens the walls to prevent this does not de-legitimize it being a human. The argumant of "when is it a human" has no basis. some pro abortion advocates say it's not a baby until it breaths.......What? Then what the hell is it? "A "Glob of tissue" that even when born many months premature and lives is still guess what.....A Human! Whether 9 months or 9 seconds the only difference is the size and if it is yet self sustaining. It needing the mother to grow is like you needing life support until you heal from a major injury but it does not mean you are not a human.
If murder is wrong...it is always wrong. The Pill kills fertilized eggs...AKA Human Babies. Choose to believe it or not but it is the truth.
Oh, and Onan was struck down for spilling his seed not for not giving his brother an heir. The punishment for not fufilling that duty was not death but a kind of shunning and public embarisment according to Deuteronomy 25. So he was killed for (as Genisis says) "what he did" AKA spilling his sead.......not "what he did not do" AKA supply an Heir.
Hope that all made sence.
ummm. if you pull my lungs out, then you have killed me. I had the ability to thrive and think and laugh and love, etc, but you took away what I had. a fertilized egg never had any of those things, only the potential for them. i suggest that you do not make any sense, what so ever with that first sentence. really, read it again to your self and explain it, if you can.PopeBenXVI wrote:You can not survive on your own if I pull your lungs out........are you then a out of womb "adult Fetus"? Your not making any sense.
The issue IS when life begins as it does begin when Sperm and egg come together. That is the same genetic makup as the adult and science proves it. Being self sustaining whether measured by brain function or other means makes no difference.
I
to me, once it is attached and in the process of consumption of nutrients from its host, the mother.PopeBenXVI wrote:The fact that your daughter did not grow to be a full grown baby does not not mean she was not your human daughter, and a person. I am sorry to hear that happened. Also, to even bring up one murdering the other makes no comparitive sense. To murder is to do somthing intentional and to be completly awaire of those ramifications.
So if you don't agree it was as you put it" Just yet a human being" then tell me when you think it is. Seriously, What specific day of the pregnancy does it all of a sudden become your child but a moment earlier it was not?
i do not think that belligerence will help anyone. what ever a person's belief, they are, like you, entitled to it. he is allowed to express himself on what ever belief he chooses. it is this debate that, in a civil and un-confrontational context, will help people get to the root of the problem. then we will be able to move past it. it just may be that he is right in all of this and i am completely wrong.comic boy wrote:Heres the deal
I will stop supporting parents who use machetes to discipline kids ,if the fruitloops stop using their fairy tale beliefs to influence others. As there seems to be confusion about what constitutes life then let me explain how things work, if you want to get married then dont rely on a biologist and if you want a medical opinion then dont ask a fucking priest !
Except he is already self-sustained. If a...no, what am I doing. This was already pointed out to you. Never mind.PopeBenXVI wrote:You stated: Second is that the issue is not substanciated by real facts, it has been proven that a fetus cannot survive on its own untill the brain is developed, this is the smallest necessity.
Your implication is that it is not a person because they are not self sustaining. I was showing that you would then not be either if your lungs were ripped out. According to your own definition you would not be a human
It's true. Except for eyeball cancer.PopeBenXVI wrote:what does it matter if you already had an ability or not. Blind people find sight and sighted people go blind. Your eyeballs genetics don't turn into anything different
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
from what i hear, stem cells do.PopeBenXVI wrote:what does it matter if you already had an ability or not. Blind people find sight and sighted people go blind. Your eyeballs genetics don't turn into anything different
and i like this too.http://www.asa3.org/asa/topics/ethics/01Gilbert.html wrote: These inner cells have this ability to form any type of the 220 cell types of the body, and this capacity is called totipotency.
Now if one were to take the inner cells of a 5-day human embryo (less than 50 cells) and put them into a flask and give them the right vitamins, hormones, nutrients, and structural supports, they will keep on growing and dividing. Moreover, they will retain their totipotency. These cells are called embryonic stem cells.
Noble words but the bottom line is that legislation ( and that is what this is all about ) must always be considered in a secular not religious context. There really is no moral argument in favour of abortion so it is folly to think there is anything to debate, in a perfect world it would never be neccessary and subsequently would never happen. However as it is not a perfect world we are forced to address matters in a relative fashion and relatively speaking the degree of murder associated with abortion is miniscule and therefore we are justified in making the operation ( within a recognised timescale ) legal. Incidently beligerance is perfectly acceptable providing there is a reasonable point enclosed within it, would you prefer acres of polite but utterly bland prose with nothing of worth imparted ?black elk speaks wrote:i do not think that belligerence will help anyone. what ever a person's belief, they are, like you, entitled to it. he is allowed to express himself on what ever belief he chooses. it is this debate that, in a civil and un-confrontational context, will help people get to the root of the problem. then we will be able to move past it. it just may be that he is right in all of this and i am completely wrong.comic boy wrote:Heres the deal
I will stop supporting parents who use machetes to discipline kids ,if the fruitloops stop using their fairy tale beliefs to influence others. As there seems to be confusion about what constitutes life then let me explain how things work, if you want to get married then dont rely on a biologist and if you want a medical opinion then dont ask a fucking priest !
i never really thought about when life actually began until just now. already, i have learned about myself and this debate. it is a good day, but your belligerence, and others in this thread, cloud the argument.
Jacques Monod and Francois Jacob for you. Back when the French did science.black elk speaks wrote:from what i hear, stem cells do.PopeBenXVI wrote:what does it matter if you already had an ability or not. Blind people find sight and sighted people go blind. Your eyeballs genetics don't turn into anything different
http://www.asa3.org/asa/topics/ethics/01Gilbert.html wrote: These inner cells have this ability to form any type of the 220 cell types of the body, and this capacity is called totipotency.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
If your point is that abortion is undesirable and should be discouraged ( certainly as a form of contraception ) then I agree with you, the problem is that I am not aware of anybody who actually supports an entirely opposite view so I assume you have an agenda rather more fareaching, ie the forced prevention of abortion.PopeBenXVI wrote:I am enjoying this but it is way late. Another day perhaps...maybe we will meet in a game some time and can continue. FYI, about 7 years ago I was about as pro death rights as you can get, then I realized what a lie it all is and how harmfull abortion is to woman sugically and emotionally for years after. If you love your wives and Daughters as I do mine, you want what is best for them. Abortion is not it and Planned parenthood makes hundreds of millions of dollars a year off that genocide business. They have the agenda and motive....I have peoples lives in mind.
Nite
Maybe he is just against abortion. Stop reading into it so much and accusing people.comic boy wrote:If your point is that abortion is undesirable and should be discouraged ( certainly as a form of contraception ) then I agree with you, the problem is that I am not aware of anybody who actually supports an entirely opposite view so I assume you have an agenda rather more fareaching, ie the forced prevention of abortion.PopeBenXVI wrote:I am enjoying this but it is way late. Another day perhaps...maybe we will meet in a game some time and can continue. FYI, about 7 years ago I was about as pro death rights as you can get, then I realized what a lie it all is and how harmfull abortion is to woman sugically and emotionally for years after. If you love your wives and Daughters as I do mine, you want what is best for them. Abortion is not it and Planned parenthood makes hundreds of millions of dollars a year off that genocide business. They have the agenda and motive....I have peoples lives in mind.
Nite
Umm... you do realize that every successful experiment with stem cells to date has been with adult stem cells, and that embryonic stem cells have yet to succeed as they theoretically should have? Research...black elk speaks wrote:from what i hear, stem cells do.PopeBenXVI wrote:what does it matter if you already had an ability or not. Blind people find sight and sighted people go blind. Your eyeballs genetics don't turn into anything different
and i like this too.http://www.asa3.org/asa/topics/ethics/01Gilbert.html wrote: These inner cells have this ability to form any type of the 220 cell types of the body, and this capacity is called totipotency.
Now if one were to take the inner cells of a 5-day human embryo (less than 50 cells) and put them into a flask and give them the right vitamins, hormones, nutrients, and structural supports, they will keep on growing and dividing. Moreover, they will retain their totipotency. These cells are called embryonic stem cells.
Every successful experiment?Nikolai wrote:Umm... you do realize that every successful experiment with stem cells to date has been with adult stem cells, and that embryonic stem cells have yet to succeed as they theoretically should have? Research...black elk speaks wrote:from what i hear, stem cells do.PopeBenXVI wrote:what does it matter if you already had an ability or not. Blind people find sight and sighted people go blind. Your eyeballs genetics don't turn into anything different
and i like this too.http://www.asa3.org/asa/topics/ethics/01Gilbert.html wrote: These inner cells have this ability to form any type of the 220 cell types of the body, and this capacity is called totipotency.
Now if one were to take the inner cells of a 5-day human embryo (less than 50 cells) and put them into a flask and give them the right vitamins, hormones, nutrients, and structural supports, they will keep on growing and dividing. Moreover, they will retain their totipotency. These cells are called embryonic stem cells.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.