Moderator: Community Team
kiddicus maximus wrote:I am amused by the fact that you're disgusted by racism.fwblb wrote: you are truly disgusting. i hope you get a month. you don't get it. and there is no apology for what you did. racism is ignorance, period. the N-word is not something you drop at a black member of the community and simply say sorry and it is dropped. i am absolutely disgusted by your post.
Hi, you live in America, the single most racist (against people of African descent, at least) country in the entire world. I actually happen to know Ronc, and he is far from racist in real life. What he said was meant to get a rise, and right or wrong, a rise it got. That whole clan is still up in arms over some silly remark made nearly a month ago on a nameless, faceless internet site intended for demolishing competition.
I don't agree with the sentiment, I don't agree with the execution... but a heartfelt apology was made and its time to move on...
to AndyDufrense!!! and Optimus Prime! Congrats for the promotions gents, hope you don't find the task too daunting...
The mods are doing fine. When they are doing their job well, you won't hear from them... unless you're one of the rabble who takes joy in being the center of internet attention. Keep multis out, keep responding to complaints, and keep order. We can ask no more of them. We can demand no less of them.
I'm so glad that someone else could see that as well. Thank you Jim.jiminski wrote: This is a very emotive subject!
I am not sure Ron helped himself with the neutrals by using the offending term again in such a seemingly blasé manner.
You see the term 'nigger' is a taboo to most of us. It has diminished somewhat in impact with its adoption and reclamation by American black culture. That has allowed it to be used by non-black people in certain circumstances but very very delicately and very very specifically.
Using that word is the verbal equivalent of standing up in a church at the end of "I do solemnly declare that I do not know of any lawful impediment why they cannot be married"
and slanderously shouting 'i banged her last night and she's my fathers wife!'
you sit in church and anticipate the embarrassment, you are compelled so strongly not to do that that you almost think you might.... but we never do!
In some ways that is where the analogy falls short; I never consider using the word pejoratively or to get a rise!
I will use it analytically, generally in rebuke of another but never as a description or a taunt.
So, although i agree in forgiveness and contrition, (Also i am unaware of the circumstance or provocation) some things are so obviously unacceptable that it is hard to deem them as a slip of the tongue; a momentary lapse in good sense or character.
Also to consider is why did Ron even bring it up here?
It seems again to be a strange act for a person in the act of contrition, though he may be exasperated it is not a smart move. It will not win over the neutral. In fact it seemed again to be an attempt to get a rise or at least hit out at Owens clan members.
At the very least not very savvy.
I'm curious as to why that would be amusing.kiddicus maximus wrote:I am amused by the fact that you're disgusted by racism.fwblb wrote: you are truly disgusting. i hope you get a month. you don't get it. and there is no apology for what you did. racism is ignorance, period. the N-word is not something you drop at a black member of the community and simply say sorry and it is dropped. i am absolutely disgusted by your post.
And so then everyone who lives there must be racist? Sounds to me like you may be the one with the prejudicial problem.kiddicus maximus wrote:Hi, you live in America, the single most racist (against people of African descent, at least) country in the entire world.
this is why blatant racist actions by members should have a mandatory ban. 24 hours for racism is not nearly enough, and it is what these guys are being given for trashing black members with racist comments that cross the line. and i find it very amusing that kiddicus doesn't tolerate racism or condone it, but he was one of the members using the word niggardly out of context while addressing a black member of the site. this garbage needs to be dealt with. kiddicus and ronc are continually baiting black members using racist words and terminology and getting away with slaps on the wrist. maybe ron and kiddicus should read the rulesBones2484 wrote:Great thoughts, Jim.
It reminds me of a few weeks ago when ron and friends were using the term "niggardly" incorrectly (although they probably thought it was correct) just to get even more of a rise from Owen.
racism is not funny. and i hope the new admins take a much firmer stance on what is truly a disgusting pattern by certain members.Community Guidelines wrote:
- In no circumstances is bigotry allowed.
- Bigotry includes racism, aggressive homophobia, religion bashing or wishing violence on any minority group.
- Bigotry takes into account historic events, emotional baggage and generally accepted associations with a term, phrase or intent - posting "White Power" in a thread has a history and is bigoted, posting "Green Power" makes you an environmentalist.

I can think of others, yes. Finding a more fitting one, I'm having a bit of trouble with though.KLOBBER wrote:Don't you people know any modifiers other than "disgusting?'
Well, I think that's precisely the problem here. If you can't think of one yourself, use an online thesaurus, for God's sake! Just look how easy it is to use different words with similar meanings....Timminz wrote:I can think of others, yes. Finding a more fitting one, I'm having a bit of trouble with though.KLOBBER wrote:Don't you people know any modifiers other than "disgusting?'
Yes. I considered each, and every one of those before making my previous statement.KLOBBER wrote:Well, I think that's precisely the problem here. If you can't think of one yourself, use an online thesaurus, for God's sake! Just look how easy it is to use different words with similar meanings....Timminz wrote:I can think of others, yes. Finding a more fitting one, I'm having a bit of trouble with though.KLOBBER wrote:Don't you people know any modifiers other than "disgusting?'
I just spent 10 seconds punching "disgusting" into thesaurus.com, and here's a list of words that it gave me:
abominable, awful, beastly, cloying, creepy, detestable, distasteful, foul, frightful, ghastly, grody, gross*, gruesome, hateful, hideous, horrid, horrific, icky*, loathsome, lousy, macabre, monstrous, nasty, nauseating, nerdy, noisome, objectionable, obnoxious, odious, offensive, outrageous, repellent, repugnant, revolting, rotten, satiating, scandalous, scuzzy, shameless, shocking, sleazeball, sleazy*, stinking, surfeiting, vile, vulgar, yecchy, yucky*
Now, instead of using the same old, boring word a dozen times in a row, you should be able to see that this conversation would have a lot more "pizzazz" if one of you were to switch it up now and then with one of the above words, each of which are considerably more imaginative. With so many wonderful and exciting synonyms at your disposal, why on earth would you want to limit yourself to one boring modifier? Personally, I like "Racism is scandalous," "Racism is nerdy," or, "Racism is yucky." Try a little variety -- I guarantee you'll be pleased with the results!
Cappice?
Gilligan wrote:I'M SO GOOD AT THIS GAME
My stepmom locked the bathroom door
So I opened the lock with my shoelace
Or he's a very precise one. Variety in writing is not necessarily a good goal, when accuracy is desired. He clearly stated that he considered all of those words and discarded them because they were not accurate enough in their meaning.KLOBBER wrote:If that's the case, then you're a very bad writer. You really need to use more than one modifier in a conversation like this one.
That is quite logical, Mr. Spock.Woodruff wrote:Or he's a very precise one. Variety in writing is not necessarily a good goal, when accuracy is desired. He clearly stated that he considered all of those words and discarded them because they were not accurate enough in their meaning.KLOBBER wrote:If that's the case, then you're a very bad writer. You really need to use more than one modifier in a conversation like this one.

yeah, a wonderful job!!Rocketry wrote:Hysari is doing particularly well...
wonder if he got a golden parachute.lackattack wrote:Hyasri is no longer Community Manager of Conquer Club. We wish him all the best in his future endeavours.
Questions: When was hyasri fired? Who is the new community manager. (If you don't want to post an answer fine, but please don't post a link to some community newsletter or something like that).Vace Cooper wrote:yeah, a wonderful job!!Rocketry wrote:Hysari is doing particularly well...wonder if he got a golden parachute.lackattack wrote:Hyasri is no longer Community Manager of Conquer Club. We wish him all the best in his future endeavours.
Ok, I'm trying to cut down on my bad language; so I'll just say this. This comment was rude and inappropriate.kiddicus maximus wrote:...read the rest of the post you quoted. Then comment. Stalker.
You have an interesting theory there. I thought all those things as well, and I even looked up his games. He only played a grand total of 8 games on this site. That looks kinda fishy, but actually proves nothing.xelabale wrote:There was a Hyasri? What did he do? Where did he roam? What decisions did he make? Was he appointed just before FW was deleted? Did he leave just after FW was deleted? Did he in fact exist?
I wish arch criminals would make stupid or arrogant mistakes, such as using an anagram of their name as a name. No such luck, unfortunately....
The thot plickens....KLOBBER wrote:You have an interesting theory there. I thought all those things as well, and I even looked up his games. He only played a grand total of 8 games on this site. That looks kinda fishy, but actually proves nothing.xelabale wrote:There was a Hyasri? What did he do? Where did he roam? What decisions did he make? Was he appointed just before FW was deleted? Did he leave just after FW was deleted? Did he in fact exist?
I wish arch criminals would make stupid or arrogant mistakes, such as using an anagram of their name as a name. No such luck, unfortunately....
Besides, if he was actually someone else on a multi account, what does it really matter?
xelabale wrote:There was a Hyasri? What did he do? Where did he roam? What decisions did he make? Was he appointed just before FW was deleted? Did he leave just after FW was deleted? Did he in fact exist?
I wish arch criminals would make stupid or arrogant mistakes, such as using an anagram of their name as a name. No such luck, unfortunately....