but I don't get it. Why was he website banned? Was someone reporting him for his game chat?clapper011 wrote:with just a forum ban tom could still play games... now that he got website banned..means no games either...
Moderator: Community Team
but I don't get it. Why was he website banned? Was someone reporting him for his game chat?clapper011 wrote:with just a forum ban tom could still play games... now that he got website banned..means no games either...
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Especially #21...it's killing me!timmytuttut88 wrote:
- 20. zsp Unknown
- 21.
- 22. pimpdave Temporary Forum Ban
This is a list for what they were ORIGINALLY banned for. If anyone can help solve the unknowns it'd be cool.
Hahaha, if I deleted it i'd feel the need to re-number the whole thing and I really don't feel like doing that.Woodruff wrote:Especially #21...it's killing me!timmytuttut88 wrote:
- 20. zsp Unknown
- 21.
- 22. pimpdave Temporary Forum Ban
This is a list for what they were ORIGINALLY banned for. If anyone can help solve the unknowns it'd be cool.
I was really cracking on the OP more than you...it's been like that since the first post. <grin>timmytuttut88 wrote:Hahaha, if I deleted it i'd feel the need to re-number the whole thing and I really don't feel like doing that.Woodruff wrote:Especially #21...it's killing me!timmytuttut88 wrote:
- 20. zsp Unknown
- 21.
- 22. pimpdave Temporary Forum Ban
This is a list for what they were ORIGINALLY banned for. If anyone can help solve the unknowns it'd be cool.
Interesting. Thanks for your help, clap.clapper011 wrote:I don't think it was for that. Maybe andy or another admin could tell you.... I really am not sure.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
FIXEDWoodruff wrote:I was really cracking on the OP more than you...it's been like that since the first post. <grin>timmytuttut88 wrote:Hahaha, if I deleted it i'd feel the need to re-number the whole thing and I really don't feel like doing that.Woodruff wrote:Especially #21...it's killing me!timmytuttut88 wrote:
- 20. zsp Unknown
- 21.
- 22. pimpdave Temporary Forum Ban
This is a list for what they were ORIGINALLY banned for. If anyone can help solve the unknowns it'd be cool.
No...i deleted that person a while ago...on edit like #5 or something...i don't even remember...like the other guy that didn't want to re-number them all. Thanks for the update mods, and thanks to you too timmytuttut. (I've got too many windows open now to remember whats what...i'm gunna try and update post #1....i'll edit this in a moment.Woodruff wrote:I was really cracking on the OP more than you...it's been like that since the first post. <grin>timmytuttut88 wrote:Hahaha, if I deleted it i'd feel the need to re-number the whole thing and I really don't feel like doing that.Woodruff wrote:Especially #21...it's killing me!timmytuttut88 wrote:
- 20. zsp Unknown
- 21.
- 22. pimpdave Temporary Forum Ban
This is a list for what they were ORIGINALLY banned for. If anyone can help solve the unknowns it'd be cool.
I agree, with some limitations. Those might include cases where "going public" would reveal too much private info or where the ban is the result of an internal admin conflict. (providing the players don't reveal the info themselves)bedub1 wrote: FYI It's my opinion that bans like this should be public....if somebody is banned from the forums or banned from the website...the case should be posted publicly and they should be made an example of...their wrongdoings should be pointed out and everybody should know about it. It will set an example of what not to do in the future. If somebody is banned because they created multiple accounts, I don't really need that to be posted. That's just obvious and doesn't need to be explained..i mean...it's rule #1 and in huge freakin letters....
Limitations?PLAYER57832 wrote: I agree, with some limitations. Those might include cases where "going public" would reveal too much private info or where the ban is the result of an internal admin conflict. (providing the players don't reveal the info themselves)
From what jake told me (while back) he got banned for spamming and then made a multi to ban evade. I could ask him later when he's on MSN. XDSkittles! wrote:Wow, what did Jake, Soundout and Hitman do? And Cynthia, and KEYOGI (who was once a map assistant).
multi - doesn't countpmchugh wrote:suspect101
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Remmy for flaming outside of Flame Wars (if I remember correctly). bb, possibly the same if someone viewed his posts in that manner. Someone would have to check those for me, but I think that is the reason.PLAYER57832 wrote:What were reminisco and bradleybradley banned for? Anyonw know?
Spazz Arcane wrote:If birds could swim and fish could fly I would awaken in the morning to the sturgeons cry. If fish could fly and birds could swim I'd still use worms to fish for them.
saxitoxin wrote:I'm on Team GabonX
Of what?GabonX wrote:Reminisco was a multi..
Spazz Arcane wrote:If birds could swim and fish could fly I would awaken in the morning to the sturgeons cry. If fish could fly and birds could swim I'd still use worms to fish for them.
saxitoxin wrote:I'm on Team GabonX
He was still one of the more interesting people around.GabonX wrote:Reminisco was a multi..
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:Free pimpdave?
I'm pretty sure they're spelled differently.muy_thaiguy wrote:Is there a difference?
Semantics.Timminz wrote:I'm pretty sure they're spelled differently.muy_thaiguy wrote:Is there a difference?